Editor: Cliff Kincaid Associate Editor: Notra Trulock
  2003 Report # 5 March 19, 2003  


  • The Growing Threat
  • Ignoring China
  • Clinton Sells Out
  • The Wen Ho Lee Case
  • The Friends Of Bill
  • Becoming A Whistleblower
  • Target Trulock
  • Trulock’s Charges Confirmed
  • More Stonewalling
  •  What You Can Do
  • AIM Report Associate Editor Notra Trulock, the former Energy Department intelligence chief who blew the whistle on Chinese espionage in the U.S. nuclear weapons laboratories, has given dozens of interviews over the last several weeks warning about the systematic Chinese threat to our national security.

    His new book, Code Name Kindred Spirit: Inside the Chinese Nuclear Scandal (Encounter Books), quotes Paul Redmond, former head of counterintelligence at the CIA, as saying that “millions of Americans could someday die as a result of successful Chinese nuclear espionage” against the U.S. In a reference to the American spies who stole our nuclear secrets for the Soviet Union, Redmond told Trulock, “This is as bad as the Rosenberg case.”

    The Washington Times’ Bill Gertz, Matt Drudge, and Fox News’ Hannity & Colmes have all called attention to this important book. Hannity called Trulock “a national hero,” while John Gizzi of Human Events appeared on MSNBC’s Hardball show and said Trulock should have been Time magazine’s “Man of the Year” for exposing the danger we face.

    But the “mainstream media,” including the Washington Post and New York Times and major networks, have ignored the book.

    In a decision made by network executives, another Fox News program had scheduled Trulock to appear but he was bumped in favor of Jermaine Jackson, the brother of Michael Jackson, the entertainer who is under fire for sleeping with kids. It seems for many in the media that a national security scandal affecting our survival as a nation is less important than the latest controversy over a strange and sick individual who has made millions of dollars singing and parading on stage while rubbing his crotch.

    Publishers Weekly says Trulock’s book “provides a unique look into the American intelligence community and an unsettling perspective on the lax attitude toward national security. Wen Ho Lee’s defensive memoir grabbed plenty of headlines, but Trulock’s account has a disturbing ring of truth.” Wen Ho Lee is the Chinese-American former Los Alamos scientist who pleaded guilty to one charge in the case and wrote a book about it.

    While the Lee book, My Country Versus Me, got early reviews from the New York Times and Washington Post, Trulock’s book has been ignored. Lee received sympathetic coverage on such programs as the NBC Today Show. He got movie offers as well, and reportedly sold the rights to his story to a film production company for a television miniseries. His supporters call him the victim of a racist witch-hunt and have launched a campaign to have him pardoned by President Bush.

    The Growing Threat

    The espionage means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) will be able to deploy advanced nuclear weapons that would have taken it many more years, if not decades, to achieve on its own. The billions of dollars spent to develop and safeguard these weapons for the protection of the American people have been thrown away because of spies and traitors in our midst.

    The PRC continues to build and deploy long-range missiles with nuclear weapons targeting the U.S. and today has approximately 20 such missiles aimed at incinerating millions of Americans in our major cities. The threat will only grow in the future.

    Trulock explains that the Chinese obtained U.S. nuclear-warhead-design secrets, including sizes, shapes and dimensions, and information on how to make them work. The PRC learned how to copy the W88, our most modern warhead, and were also going after the Trident II D-5 ballistic missile, our most advanced. It was first deployed in 1990 and is scheduled to be deployed past 2020.

    Ignoring China

    The U.S. may take care of the Iraqi nuclear weapons program with a military assault on the Saddam Hussein regime, but that still leaves the growing danger posed by the PRC, a major proliferator of nuclear, chemical and missile-related materials and technology. As Trulock has declared, “China has been stealing our nuclear secrets and passing them on. Would the Axis of Evil have weapons of mass destruction today were it not for China?”

    Trulock documents how China, an emerging economic and military superpower, has been stealing U.S. nuclear weapons secrets for over 20 years, since the Jimmy Carter administration started the process of opening up our national weapons laboratories to foreign scientists and other visitors.

    Such a policy extended to scientists from countries such as Iran, Iraq, and Syria, who were invited to the national labs.

    Indeed, in another blockbuster revelation, Trulock discloses that the Iraqis got help to build their own nuclear bomb from the U.S. itself and this fact was documented in a government report. “I had a bootleg copy of one such report on the Iraqis’ acquisition of nuclear information from the [U.S.] nuclear labs,” he writes, “but I was never able to get it widely distributed to the Intelligence Community.” Trulock suspected that distribution of the report was blocked because it might lead to a reduction or termination of U.S. lab contacts with foreign scientists. Copies of the report were later destroyed.

    U.S. assistance to Iraq is confirmed by Dr. Khidhir Hamza, who, from 1987 to 1994, served as the head of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear weapons program. He is the co-author of the book “Saddam’s Bombmaker.” At a critical point in the development of the Iraqi nuclear bomb, when the regime was trying to figure out how to make a trigger, Iraqi scientists were invited to the U.S. to attend a conference on high-tech explosives sponsored by Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore laboratories. Information gathered at this conference helped the Iraqis overcome this problem.

    Trulock comments, “I wonder how many Americans know that the Iraqi nuclear weapons program was helped with expertise and information learned at conferences sponsored by two premier U.S. nuclear weapons labs.”

    Clinton Sells Out

    One part of the story is an old one. The Clinton administration pursued a pro-China policy that resulted in playing down the China threat, including its espionage program against America. This was motivated, at least in part, by PRC financial donations to the Democratic Party. Trulock documents how Clinton officials “didn’t lift a finger” to look into the espionage problem and stop it. “I was ordered to cover this up, to bury it,” he says. He went outside the Department of Energy (DOE) to the White House and still couldn’t get any help. Eventually, there was a “brief flurry” on Capitol Hill, when Republicans looked into the scandal, but that quickly died away. Trulock was demonized as a racist and his mental stability was questioned. “I became the villain.”

    But another part of the story concerns how the Bush administration continues this policy.

    Many Americans were astounded when Chinese General Xiong Guangkai-the man who threatened to level Los Angeles using nuclear weapons-arrived in Washington D.C. in 2000 to meet with then-Secretary of Defense William Cohen. He is described in the book, Red Dragon Rising, as the chief spymaster of China who “inherited and then perfected the most successful espionage operation against America in our nation’s history.” He returned to Washington last December for additional discussions with Pentagon officials under President Bush.

    Trulock notes that Bob Woodward’s book, Bush At War, reports that Bush was told by CIA director George Tenet about three major threats his administration would face after he assumed office-Osama bin Laden, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and the rise of China. Trulock comments, “He couldn’t avoid dealing with bin Laden after 9/11. And he now has to confront weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, North Korea and Iran. But China has dropped off the face of the earth.”

    There is no evidence of any PRC financial link to the Bush administration. But Trulock believes the administration has been blinded to the China threat by the corporate push to open markets in the PRC and a diplomatic desire not to embarrass the dictatorship.

    In an ominous development under Bush, Steve Dillard has become director of counterintelligence at DOE. “Talk about the fox in the henhouse,” says Trulock. Dillard, who ran the FBI counterintelligence investigation of Wen Ho Lee in 1996-97, was “lying to Congress” about its progress and bungled the probe.

    The Wen Ho Lee Case

    While Lee was publicized as the prime suspect in the theft of our nuclear secrets on behalf of the PRC, Trulock says the FBI ignored ten other suspects at the labs and failed to investigate defense department contractors with access to U.S. nuclear weapons information who may also have compromised or released it.

    Hence, the espionage may be ongoing and the cover-up may be continuing.

    But in regard to Lee, Trulock notes that the U.S. had a strong case but failed to make it. While the Rosenbergs were executed for espionage, Lee, who had been charged with 59 felony counts under the Atomic Energy Act and the Foreign Espionage Act and held in solitary confinement for nine months, agreed to a plea bargain on September 13, 2000. It gave him free-dom for pleading guilty to one felony, improperly downloading classified material onto an unclassified computer.

    The Friends Of Bill

    Trulock is convinced that the case against Wen Ho Lee was deliberately sabotaged by someone high in the government. He explains, “They could have pursued espionage charges against him, but the government opted for the much lesser charge-mishandling classified information-that didn’t involve any embarrassment for the PRC.”

    Another espionage case involved Peter Lee, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Taiwan who worked at both Los Alamos and Livermore labs during the 1980s and provided China with classified secrets about the U.S. nuclear-warhead program. He was also caught giving the Chinese details about the U.S. anti-submarine warfare program. Jonathan Shapiro, the assistant U.S. attorney in Los Angeles, wanted to prosecute Lee for espionage. But the Department of Justice declined because it would offend Beijing. Instead, he was prosecuted on a charge of mishandling classified data. He got a year in a halfway house. The indictment on this charge was delayed until after a Clinton meeting with PRC President Jiang Zemin in late October 1997, so as not to embarrass the PRC leader.

    In the campaign to destroy Trulock and divert attention away from his revelations, the Clinton administration relied on a network of sympathetic reporters led by Walter Pincus of the Washington Post. Trulock says that when the scandal broke, he was warned by a Post official to beware of Pincus, a known “friend of Bill” who was close to the Clintons. Pincus and Vernon Loeb of the Post wrote a story falsely claiming that Trulock was guilty of “singling out Wen Ho Lee.” They also sought to minimize the damage caused by the theft of U.S. nuclear secrets.

    After another Pincus-Loeb story raised the issue of the Lees’ ethnicity being a factor in their selection as suspects, Senators Fred Thompson and Joseph Lieberman, the ranking members of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, wrote a letter to the paper declaring this to be false and an invention by the reporters. The Senators said there was “no basis” to suggest that race was a factor, and that it became an issue later in the investigation when FBI experts noted that Beijing targets Chinese-American scientists for recruitment.

    The New York Times broke the espionage story, using Trulock as one of its sources, on March 6, 1999. But when lawyers for Wen Ho Lee, in the summer of 2000, confronted the paper about its coverage and threatened to cut its reporters off from information about the case, Trulock says the Times put reporter Bill Broad on the story in place of Jeff Gerth and James Risen. Broad recast the story into one that depicted Lee as a victim.

    Becoming A Whistleblower

    Trulock did not set out to become a whistleblower. His 30 years in intelligence were a record of success spent away from the limelight. He had voted for Clinton for president twice. In this context, the book represents the first inside account of what really happened in the Clinton administration by someone who was not a “Friend of Bill.”

    He became a whistleblower only because a series of Clinton officials tried to keep the lid on a scandal that he knew affected the national security, even the survival, of the United States. It was in 1997 that Trulock took the evidence of espionage to Ken Baker, acting director at the DOE Office of Nonproliferation and National Security, whose response was, “The horse has left the barn, so lets just forget about it.” Gary Samore, senior director for nonproliferation on Clinton’s National Security Council, didn’t object to additional security at the labs but emphasized that U.S.-Chinese scientific exchanges-where some of the espionage took place-would continue because that was administration policy.

    When he was asked by Rep. Duncan Hunter of California to testify on Capitol Hill about the espionage scandal, Trulock was gagged by DOE and his testimony was edited to prevent full disclosure of the damage that was done.

    In 1998, when DOE was asked for documents by the Cox Committee investigating Chinese espionage, White House chief of staff John Podesta ordered DOE Secretary Bill Richardson to stall the request and “run out the clock.” The Republicans thwarted this by extending the life of the committee.

    In the end, all Democrat and Republican members of this committee joined chairman Rep. Christopher Cox of California in confirming Chinese espionage and the theft of our nuclear secrets.

    Target Trulock

    Speaking at an AIM luncheon in Washington, Trulock reflected on what has happened to him. “The price is very high,” he said, “because there is no safety net for whistleblowers.” Conservative groups such as the Free Congress Foundation, Judicial Watch and AIM came to his assistance, but many did not. Members of Congress such as Senator John Warner of Virginia abandoned him after promising never to do so.

    Trulock’s book exposes the lack of integrity and courage of many officials that he encountered in the Clinton era, including those who are supposed to protect us from wrongdoing by our enemies and those they subvert. It shows the importance of providing protection and encouragement for those like Trulock who bravely risk their careers by telling the truth and exposing dishonesty, corruption, incompetence and even espionage. Such public servants deserve praise and rewards, not punishment.

    Trulock was not only labeled a racist and forced out of government service and then out of a private job into bankruptcy, he was investigated and his townhouse was raided and searched by FBI agents who took his computer and personal records. They claimed to be investigating him for the improper release of classified information, but it was obvious retaliation for daring to criticize the FBI’s performance in the Lee case.

    With the assistance of Larry Klayman’s Judicial Watch, he has fought back. He sued Wen Ho Lee, Bob Vrooman (director of the Los Alamos Operational Security Office from 1987 to 1998) and Charles Washington (former Acting Director of Counterintelligence at DOE) for defamation for claiming Trulock was a racist who had singled out Lee for investigation because he was ethnic Chinese.

    Trulock’s Charges Confirmed

    It was this litigation that led to the release of a Justice Department report, completed in May 2000 by a team headed by senior prosecutor Randy Bellows, which was heavily censored but confirmed Trulock’s account of the FBI’s bungling of the case and found the charges of racism to be “without merit.”

    Bellows, who prosecuted FBI Special Agent Robert Hanssen as a Russian spy, found that there was sufficient probable cause to believe that Lee was an agent of China conducting intelligence activities on its behalf, and that his wife was aiding and abetting him.

    “Lee repeatedly lied to the FBI and to his superiors at Los Alamos about his interactions with PRC nuclear scientists,” Trulock says. “He repeatedly lied about what he was doing with his construction of a portable nuclear library of secrets on every one of our warheads.”

    More Stonewalling

    It took about a year to go through various intelligence agencies for approval of the book itself. The CIA even tried to keep portions of the published Cox report on nuclear espionage from being cited in the book. The Department of Energy at one point refused to discuss its objections on the pretext that Trulock didn’t have a security clearance. Eventually, Trulock and his publisher, Encounter Books, had to get legal counsel and threaten a lawsuit to get the matters resolved.

    But Trulock still waits for vindication from the Department of Justice. Attorney General John Ashcroft has refused to close the dubious case against him and help restore his reputation.

    What You Can Do

    Send the enclosed cards or your own cards or letters to Charles McGrath, editor of the New York Times Book Review and Maria Arana, editor of the Washington Post Book World. Also, for those interested, you can buy the book Code Name Kindred Spirit from AIM's online bookstore. Click here.

    CLIFF'S NOTES By Cliff Kincaid

    MILLIONS OF PEOPLE MARCHED AGAINST A WAR IN IRAQ OVER THE days of February 14-16. People in free countries were using their freedom to safeguard a dictatorship that threatens the freedom and security of other countries. The Iraqi media hailed the protests as a great victory for Saddam Hussein because the demonstrators opposed U.S. policy and did not urge Saddam to disarm. The government-backed Al-Jumhuriya newspaper covered its front page with the headline “Victory for you, Iraq.” It said the demonstrations in U.S. cities showed that Americans did not believe the “lies” of President George Bush. The Iraqi media said that a demonstration in London, which drew a million people, had delivered a serious blow to Prime Minister Tony Blair. Iraq’s state-run media said the worldwide demonstrations and the latest U.N. disarmament report showed Baghdad’s “victory” and Washington’s “defeat.”

    In our last AIM Report we detailed the evidence of communist sponsorship and involvement in the “anti-war” demonstrations here on Jan. 18th. My column on this matter generated an interesting email from a conservative in Australia, who said the “leftist idiots” in the streets there are mostly young people infatuated with a new cause. He said the government, the older generation and a “silent majority” support military action against Iraq. However, he acknowledges that Internet message boards are running 70-80% anti-American. “Sadly,” he says, “most Aussies are yet to fully grasp that Australia could not defend herself from a concerted terrorist action. When that time comes, God forbid, the reality check will correct the stupidity of these punk Leftists out of self-interest.”

    ON THE CBS 60 MINUTES PROGRAM ON FEBRUARY 16, COMMENTATOR ANDY ROONEY unloaded on the French, saying “The French lost World War II to the Germans in about 20 minutes. Along with the British, we got into the war and had about 150,000 guys killed getting their country back...Americans have a right to protest going to war with Iraq. The French do not. They owe us the independence they flaunt in our face at the U.N.” Rooney was exaggerating, but a “Boycott Cowardly France” campaign is gathering steam here with the support of prominent conservatives. Although France has a “conservative” Prime Minister, Jacques Chirac, communists and leftist political parties are very strong there. In addition, France, with a population of 61 million, has about two million Muslims and major commercial interests in Iraq. In the U.S., by contrast, with a population over four times as large, we have “only” about 1.6 million.

    THERE IS A LEGITIMATE CASE TO BE MADE AGAINST GOING TO WAR WITH IRAQ. IT IS THAT we are not prepared for the anti-American terrorism that may result. I heard a White House official say that we are “woefully unprepared” for terrorists who enter our country and that it is still far too easy to sneak weapons and even bombs into the U.S. through our ports. Just before Valentine’s Day, federal officials upgraded the terror alert and told us to use plastic sheeting and duct tape to prepare for a chemical attack. Nothing happened, and it appears that some of the information was inaccurate or fabricated by intelligence sources. Instead of terrorism, Washington, D.C. got hit by a massive snowstorm.

    THE SNOWSTORM AND EXTREMELY COLD WEATHER IN WASHINGTON, D.C. HAVE somewhat tempered the cries about “global warming.” But Marc Morano of CNSNews.com found one environmentalist who claimed that the blizzard which left more than two feet of snow in some areas of the mid-Atlantic and Northeast was “very much in line with the predictions of climate models” that predict human-caused “global warming.” She was Melissa Carey, a climate-change-policy specialist with the Environmental Defense Fund. Curiously, one of the proponents of the theory that global warming is caused by human activity is Bill O’Reilly of Fox News. I was a guest on his program on February 11 to debate this and other matters. We will have a full report on this exchange in our next issue. I called the global warming theory a “myth” and O’Reilly replied that experts at MIT-the Massachusetts Institute of Technology-had convinced him that human discharge of fossil fuels was heating up the atmosphere. Ironically, MIT is associated in the public mind with one of the leading skeptics of the theory-Richard S. Lindzen. So I don’t know what O’Reilly is talking about.

    ANOTHER POSSIBLE ARGUMENT AGAINST GOING TO WAR WITH IRAQ IS THAT IT IS A distraction from the real enemy-Communist China. A war on Iraq could be used by China as an opportunity to grab Taiwan. Or China could turn North Korea’s million-man army loose on South Korea. I don’t know how likely are these scenarios, but I do know that many “experts” fail to take the China threat seriously. Notra Trulock took it seriously, and the story of what happened to him is told in this issue of the AIM Report. We need to take action to get him interviewed in the major media and get his book reviewed in the press. We point out that Notra was bumped from one show on Fox to make room for a discussion of entertainer Michael Jackson. Indeed, the media seem to be in a feeding frenzy over this alleged pedophile. NBC’s Dateline show aired two hours about Jackson, and the Fox television network paid for exclusive Michael Jackson footage that appeared in a program later in the week. This follows the spectacle of the ABC television network paying for a British documentary and interview of Jackson that it aired here. Millions of people tuned in. What a shame.

    NOTRA HIGHLIGHTS THE LACK OF A SAFETY NET FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS. IN THE WAKE OF the Columbia Shuttle tragedy, we have seen several NASA whistleblowers come forward. One, former NASA engineer Dennis Olivares, has written to us, saying, “If all the skeletons in the Space Shuttle Closet were to emerge all at once now, it would make the fabled Elephant’s Graveyard look like a kiddie’s Halloween party.” For calling attention to NASA mismanagement, he says his career was ruined. For a short time, however, he says a handful of employees established a Whistleblowers Alliance & Relocation Network (WARN) to press the case for reform before Congress. He says the NASA Inspector General (IG) hurts, rather than helps, the cause of whistleblowers, and he suggests the abolition of the IG offices at each agency and their replacement by a more centralized IG office that would work with, protect, and decorate whistleblowers. Olivares also believes there is no need for manned space flights. He says the scientific goals being pursued by Columbia could more easily be achieved by robotic satellites and spacecraft.

    WE HAVE RECEIVED MANY MESSAGES ABOUT OUR NEW FORMAT, AND THE VAST majority has been favorable. We have also received some interesting comments on other matters. One AIM subscriber from Illinois wrote to us about White House political adviser Karl Rove and his attitude toward conservatives. We had mentioned that Rove is driving the policy of appealing to minority groups, and that he had targeted Republican Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado, who opposes increased immigration, for defeat. “Too much has been written about his political genius,” said Gerald Sodaro, “His agenda is clear: he supports moderate Republicans vs. conservatives in primaries...In Illinois, Rove actively worked...to minimize conservative victories by supporting the corrupt establishment RINO [Republican in name only] Republicans who were in power for too long...The result in the latest general election was the largest Republican defeat in any state.”

    ANOTHER WHITE HOUSE CONTROVERSY HAS EMERGED IN SECURITY EXPERT FRANK Gaffney’s revelations that Ali Tulbah, an associate director of cabinet affairs in the White House, arranged a January 16 White House “dialogue” with Muslim groups opposed to the administration’s program to register aliens from Muslim and terrorist nations. The groups included the American Muslim Council and the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which oppose the Bush policy on Iraq and whose officials have supported terrorist organizations such as Hamas. The “spiritual leader” of Hamas has threatened suicide attacks against American troops in the event of an attack on Iraq. Both U.S.-based Islamic groups belong to the National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom, whose president, Sami Al-Arian, is the former professor based in Florida who was under investigation for alleged ties to Palestinian Islamic Jihad and was indicted for those connections on February 20. He met and was photographed with then-candidate George W. Bush during the 2000 campaign.

    Like What You Read?

    Back To AIM Report Section

    AIM Main Page