Accuracy in Media

The answer is that the liberal news media DID fawn over Hillary Clinton in 2016 more than Sarah Palin in 2008, when number of news articles and their headlines are compared:

CNN:

• 2008: “McCain taps Alaska Gov. Palin as vice president pick“
• 2016: “How Hillary Clinton defined her historic moment”
  • “Clinton nomination puts ‘biggest crack’ in glass ceiling“
  • “‘Feminist Christmas: World reacts to Clinton’s Democratic convention“

NBC News:

• 2008: “VP pick Palin makes appeal to women voters”
  • “Palin is McCain’s boldest gamble“
• 2016: “Hillary Clinton Becomes First Female Nominee of Major U.S. Political Party”
  • “Latino delegates on Clinton nomination: ‘Historic’“
  • “Touting Togetherness, Hillary Clinton Accepts Nomination With Promise to Heal Nation’s Divides“
  • “On historic night, Hillary Clinton favors pragmatism over flair“

ABC News:

• 2008: “Sarah Palin makes history as first female vice presidential nominee of Republican Party”
  • “McCain taps Alaska Governor Palin as vice presidential running mate“
• 2016: “Hillary Clinton makes history accepting Democratic nomination”
  • “Hillary Clinton makes history as Democratic nominee“
  • “Hillary Clinton accepts Historic Democratic nomination“
  • “Celebrities congratulate Hillary Clinton’s historic Nomination at the DNC“
  • “FULL TEXT: Hillary Clinton’s Historic 2016 Democratic National Convention Speech“

 

CBS News:

• 2008: “2008: Sarah Palin accepts VP nomination at RNC“

• 2016: “Hillary Clinton’s long march to the Democratic nomination”
  • “Carole King on Hillary Clinton’s nomination: ‘It is her time’“
  • “Hillary Clinton officially accepts presidential nomination“

---