Accuracy in Media

The
meteoric rise of Sen. Barack Obama has many thinking that he is
destined for the office of President. Yet less than a year ago he was
considered flash in the pan in comparison to Sen. Hillary Clinton, who
was thought to have the Democrat nomination sewed up. Well, one by one
the other Democrat candidates pulled out as their support and/or their
cash dried up, thus leaving Obama and Clinton to fight it out until the
first week of June when Clinton “suspended” her campaign. Obama now is
the presumed Democrat nominee and the direction of his campaign has
turned to defeating Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican
nominee, in November. Let’s take a look at some of his recent
statements and activity.

Change à la Obama

Obama has
been able to raise bundles of cash. His current cash balance is
reported to be millions in excess of the McCain campaign. Up until last
week, it was thought that Obama was going to accept the $80 plus
million of federal campaign money (he had last indicated thus less than
two months ago) and use that for the Presidential run. Suddenly, Obama
announced that he was not going to take federal funds as he had
promised and would raise funds on his own – giving him the ability to
amass plenty of moolah without limitations. Is this “flip-flopping?”
His staff doesn’t seem to think it is.

One of the major messages
of the Obama campaign is that he alone has the ability to change
Washington and the way things are done there. Just when he has a chance
to prove that change, he goes the way of the Washington politicians!
Coincidence? You make the call.

Muslim “Surprise”

The
Obama campaign staff made a major blunder a couple of weeks ago when it
barred two Muslim women wearing traditional attire from sitting in the
area immediately behind the podium at a Detroit rally where Obama was
to speak. When word got out, Obama himself contacted the women,
apologized, and said the issue would be remedied. It’s obvious as to
why this came up, considering the “is he or isn’t he a Muslim” flap.
How would it look on a newscast or YouTube?

Yet should we
really be surprised? The fact that Obama’s advance people and his
handlers “stack” the audience is nothing new in the world of politics.
If he wants to burnish his image with white people, the front rows
behind him are filled with mainly whites. If black voters are his
target that day, the audience we see on television is made up of mostly
blacks. And so it goes with any number of ethnic groups. A number of
years ago, I read a book by Patrick Halley entitled On the Road with Hillary. Halley was an advance man for Hillary Clinton as far back as when Bill
Clinton first entered national politics. It’s a fascinating look into
the inner workings of how campaign appearances are set up and even for
appearances not directly connected to the campaign. “Stacking” and
other methods used in making sure the candidate/speaker comes off in
the best possible light to those in the audience and those who may see
the video are well explained.

Veep Madness

My last article touched on this, but it seems strange to me that Obama has a team of
people to vet possible individuals to be his veep choice. Shouldn’t it
be Obama, who has the “judgment to lead,” who knows best what he wants
in a running mate? With the limited experience Obama possesses in
foreign relations and national security, as well as the military, he
may well pursue someone with high credibility in those areas. It is
also possible that he may want to place a female (other than Hillary
Clinton) in place to assuage the tender feelings that were damaged in
the primary against Hillary – at the same time appeal to even more
woman voters. In reality, other than having knowledge to cover a
weakness in the candidate the only real important reason in selecting a
Vice President is to be sure that person would go forward with the
ideals and policies of the President and the Party if the President was
removed from the picture. It will be interesting to see if Obama sticks
to this basic principle.

First Ladies Poll

Questions
about Michelle Obama and Cindy McCain should have little relevance in
the campaign, with the possible exception of how they may influence
their husband if elected. The Rasmussen Reports Group recently ran a poll asking a number of questions and even comparing the
two presumptive first ladies to the current First Lady, Laura Bush, who
currently holds a 75% favorability rating among voters and has held
that position fairly consistently throughout her husband’s Presidency.
Needless to say, she’s a tough act to follow! According to Rasmussen,
both potential First Ladies are seen to have quite a bit of influence
with their hubbies. And while both Cindy McCain and Michelle Obama have
similar approval ratings (49% and 48% respectively), the disapproval
ratings tell a different story: 29% have an unfavorable view of Cindy,
while 43% have an unfavorable view of Michelle. If the First Lady’s job
is to complement the president, it looks like Michelle has a lot of
ground to make up – or not, depending on your view.

Promises, Promises

Like
any seasoned politician, Obama has made promises for numerous things.
Yes, in our hearts we know that campaign promises are not expected to
be kept 100%, some of Obama’s are so far from reality one has to wonder
what he is thinking. Here are just a couple of the things he wants to
do that have one thing in common…can you guess what that is?

  • He says that everyone should go to college!
  • He says that everyone should have government-sponsored health coverage!

If
you guessed that higher taxes – taken out of YOUR paycheck – are the
common bond between these two programs, you’d be right. Which brings us
to…

Healthcare, Obama Style

Obama’s healthcare
plan is supposed cover every American and no one will be turned away.
How will it function? Basically it is a form of socialized medicine.
His idea is to force physicians to accept less than normal rates for
their services to patients and he wants to add an additional tax on
doctors’ earnings of at least 4.0%. His “health commission” would also
determine what type of services/procedures and drugs the government
would pay for. It sounds a lot like what HMOs currently do, but on a
much larger scale, with all the grace and finesse of those other
government agencies like the DMV and Post Office – and no chance to go
to a different health provider if you don’t like your current one. (One
need only look at these two cases, on in the U.S. and one in Canada, to see what I mean.)

Are Those Skeletons Rattling in the Closet?

Although
numerous questions have been asked about Obama about his background,
few of which have been answered, none are so interesting and possibly
devastating to his presidential campaign as those centering on the Tony Rezko and Nadhmi Auchi connection.
Follow that with his alleged brief (we know differently) association
with convicted terrorist William Ayers. Or how about Rashid Khalidi, a
Palestinian who is vocally anti-Israel and who has been closely connected with Obama in the past as a supporter and fund raiser. Then of course there is the
racist, hatred spewing, anti-white, anti-American preaching Rev.
Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s Pastor and “mentor” for 20 plus years. Wright
has traveled to Libya to meet with General Khadaffi and has bestowed
honors on Louis Farrakhan.

Who is the real Barack Obama? For many, that question continue to go unanswered.

Moving
forward, here seems to be a slight movement of Obama’s thinking toward
the center Left from the far liberal Left. His opinions on the FISA
rewrite and public campaign financing indicate a “change” in tack for
his campaign. I’m sure we can look forward to a lot more “change” in
the days and weeks to come.

Until next time…


Guest columns do not necessarily reflect the views of Accuracy in Media or its staff.



Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.

Comments