Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler gave Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) the maximum four Pinocchios for claiming that 40 percent of guns are sold without background checks on national TV on Sunday.
“We have to end the absurdity of the gun show loophole. Forty percent of the guns in this country are sold without any background checks.”
— Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Feb. 18, 2018
Kessler called Sanders’ statement a “zombie” claim he thought was dead and buried.
We thought we had long ago buried this false claim that 40 percent of guns are sold without a background check. But it has once again risen from the dead! Let’s explore.
The figure stems from a survey of just 251 people conducted in the wake of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Conn. In that survey, people were asked about guns they obtained in 1993 and 1994 even though the Brady Law mandating such checks only went into effect in 1994.
The analysis concluded that 35.7 percent of respondents indicated that they did not receive their guns from a licensed firearms dealer. Rounding up gets you to 40 percent, although the survey sample is so small it could also be rounded down to 30 percent.
The original report carefully used terms such as “acquisitions” and “transactions,” which included trades, gifts and the like. This subtlety is lost on many politicians, such as Sanders, who referred to weapons that are “sold.” But it’s an important detail because many of the people who obtained a gun without a background check either received it as a gift or inherited it.
Why is it important to make a distinction between purchases and transactions? For one thing, the failed 2013 Senate compromise bill that would have required background checks for gun shows and Internet sales specifically made an exception for gifts (and even sales) among family members and neighbors. Including the data on such transactions can change the results.
Upon further investigation of the 1993-1994 research, including rerunning the numbers to better distinguish between gun purchases and gifts, we learned that gun purchases without background checks amounted to 14 to 22 percent.
Obama may have been dealing with old information, but Kessler said Sanders has no such excuse for being so far off-base.
But Sanders now has even less of an excuse than Obama. That’s because in 2017, researchers at Harvard University finally published a new survey — and they found that 22 percent of gun owners who reported obtaining a firearm in the previous two years did so without a background check. That’s almost half the percentage of the old figure.
Moreover, among purchased firearms, the figure was 13 percent. That’s one-third of Sanders’s 40 percent claim. Once again, nonpurchased firearms (such as those acquired via a gift or inheritance) accounted for a large share of the weapons obtained without a background check.
Though Sanders referred to the “gun show loophole,” not a single person surveyed said they obtained a weapon at a gun show without a background check.
“Sen. Sanders on Meet the Press provided the best information he had at the time,” spokesman Josh Miller-Lewis told the Post. “It appears the number he cited may be outdated. But whether it’s 40 percent or 22 percent of guns being acquired without a background check, millions of Americans still obtain guns without background checks. That’s absurd. No one should be allowed to purchase a gun without a vigorous background check.”
Kessler concludes with his Pinocchio test of Sanders claim.
It’s bad enough that politicians four years ago were using stale data and mischaracterizing it. But now that the research has been updated, Sanders has even less excuse for relying on two-decade-old figures. The most recent research indicates that just 13 percent of guns — not 40 percent — are purchased without a background check.
CommentsComments are turned off for this article.