Accuracy in Media

Mainstream media outlets covered the 2017 Women’s March on Washington, and other affiliated Women’s March events across the United States, interviewing attendees and heralding the movement as a budding, anti-Trump movement. Now, over two years later, the Women’s March board is shuffling and changing as three board members are leaving amid charges of anti-Semitism.

Tamika Mallory, Bob Bland and Linda Sarsour were three founding members of the organization and agreed to leave the board. The media used a variety of phrases to describe their departure.

NBC News said that their departure came after “anti-Semitism accusations.” The outlet added that the focus of anti-Semitism accusations was their “association with Louis Farrakhan, the Nation of Islam leader who has been denounced for making anti-Semitic and homophobic comments. The women have repeatedly denied the claims and denounced anti-Semitism, but some critics have said its response did not come fast enough or was not strong enough.”

Salon said, “Both Mallory and Sarsour were accused of using the Women’s March — an organization which exists to promote women’s rights — as a platform for statements critics claimed were hostile to Jews. It is unclear whether those accusations played a role in their departures from the organization.” It added that Mallory “has been criticized for her ties to the Nation of Islam and its anti-Semitic leader Louis Farrakhan, including an occasion when she attended an event where Farrakhan made anti-Semitic remarks.”

The New York Times said that they stepped down “after controversies” and The Week noted “anti-Semitism, other missteps” as the reason behind the board’s shake-up.

The mainstream media acknowledged the anti-Semitic comments and actions taken by some of the outgoing board members, which is a positive development in accurate and ethical reporting and journalism. However, it is important to note that it took at least a year for the board to push these particular members out after anti-Semitism accusations were levied against them. The delay in changing the board’s make-up validated many critics who said the Women’s March (and by extension, the mainstream media) was too slow to condemn anti-Semitism and too slow to take action to rectify these offenses.

Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.


Comments are turned off for this article.