Accuracy in Media

Part One

A Special Report from the Accuracy in Media Center for Investigative Journalism; Cliff Kincaid, Director

FBI Director James Comey has been caught going around to secret Congressional briefings in “recent weeks” touting the lurid fake “Trump dossier.” He has been claiming that it is a major foundation of the FBI’s investigation of purported Russian collusion with Trump to interfere in the election—months after the FBI had already assessed the “dossier” as non-credible.

Comey seems not to grasp the nature of the damage he’s inflicting on the Bureau and its reputation for efficient information-gathering and law enforcement. He is lost in a “wilderness of mirrors,” to use intelligence jargon popularized by the CIA’s legendary anti-communist mole-hunter James Jesus Angleton.

This “Trump dossier” is the controversial document supposedly composed by “ex” British MI6 agent Christopher Steele through the group known as Fusion GPS. Paid for by still-unidentified Hillary Clinton supporters, it was “opposition research” against then-candidate, now President, Donald Trump.

Fusion GPS has been revealed to be a pro-Russia lobby by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA). British citizen Steele admitted he had larger plans than writing the “dossier” itself, but “really thought that what he had would sway the election“—by using the “dossier” to defeat Trump —said an associate to the BBC. That is called foreign interference in a U.S. election.

At this point, here is what we know for sure: the document, which was designed to “prove” that Trump is a Russian agent, originated with a group working on behalf of Russian interests and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Indeed, evidence points to Russian involvement—via Hillary financiers and their hired-gun Russia lobby firm Fusion GPS—in fabricating the “dossier” to discredit Trump by claiming that he was part of a conspiracy to help elect himself president.

A Russia expert with 50 years’ experience, writing for Forbes, says the “dossier” reads like it was written by “a Russian trained in the KGB tradition.” Its “poor grammar and shaky spelling” with “KGB-style intelligence reporting” just does not “fit the image” of work by a “highly connected former British intelligence” officer, who was Oxford educated.

The Russians may have cobbled the “dossier” material together and passed it on to Fusion GPS and Steele to assemble and edit for the Hillary backers.

This means that the House and Senate Intelligence committees have been investigating the wrong alleged scandal. It’s not Trump and his associates who should be under scrutiny; it’s Hillary Clinton and her paid operatives—and their ties to Russia.

Has the FBI and its British counterpart, the MI5 security service, opened a case against Steele to investigate him for working for a Russian lobbying firm operating in the U.S.? Or was Steele working undercover for MI6 to infiltrate the Russian lobby? On the other hand, Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions. Anyone remember the Cambridge Five Soviet spy ring?

In a significant development, The Washington Times now reports that Michael D. Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, is considering legal action against BuzzFeed, which posted the fraudulent “dossier” that accused Cohen of conspiring with Russian agents. But Cohen never went to Prague—it was a “different Michael Cohen” who went there. Cohen told The Washington Times that he also is considering a lawsuit against Christopher Steele.

Cohen was probably chosen to be named in the “dossier” by its fabricators because the pro-Hillary media went viral against him for a campaign comment he made that enraged them. Cohen had dared to defy all the polls predicting Hillary would win, by saying, “says who?”—resulting in an extraordinary but belated post-election apology by The Washington Post.

A Cohen lawsuit could slow down the efforts by losing leftist Democrats and their minions to use the dossier as proof of a Russian conspiracy with Trump.

It appears that the only significant Russia connection the media have left is the story that Accuracy in Media first broke in 2015 when we revealed retired Lt. General Michael T. Flynn’s attendance at a public conference in Moscow with Russian president Vladimir Putin. This was to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the propaganda channel “RT” (Russia Today), aka “KGB-TV.” Flynn, former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, became Trump’s national security adviser before resigning over apparent misrepresentations he made to Vice President Mike Pence about his perfectly appropriate conversations with the Russian ambassador.

The idea that Flynn was in any sense a Russia agent was undermined by the contents of his book, The Field of Fight, arguing that Russia and China are behind an “enemy alliance” of countries and movements trying to destroy the U.S.

Whether Flynn disclosed the entire story about his Russian contacts remains to be seen. The matter is irrelevant to the far more serious issue in Flynn’s case, namely the illegal disclosure of his wiretapped conversations to CIA mouthpiece David Ignatius of The Washington Post.  Unraveling how and why this occurred could shed light on the Watergate-style surveillance that President Obama or his aides authorized on the Trump campaign and how the political intelligence was shared with Hillary’s operatives in the bureaucracy. (See previous AIM Special Reports March 18, April 4, April 11, April 17.)

Endless Absurdities

We have previously pointed out the absurdities in the “dossier.” Some of the major media have acknowledged them as well. The document is a poorly slapped together collage of ridiculous contradictions and absurdities (e.g., Russian senior citizens in Miami as the DNC “hackers”).

Indeed, the very day the “dossier” was published on January 11, Newsweek posted an analysis, “Thirteen Things That Don’t Add Up in the Russia-Trump Intelligence Dossier,” with a video presentation titled “8 Reasons to be Skeptical.” The fact is that Newsweek had months to study the “dossier,” since its initial enthusiastic anti-Trump report made in time to influence the election. Newsweek saw some grave problems but withheld them until prompted to go public by the publication of the full 35-page “dossier.”

Newsweek caught one of the most glaring contradictions in the “dossier,” namely one paragraph saying that Russia “fed” Trump compromising intelligence on Hillary Clinton, the next saying they never did (though Newsweek did bungle some other points).

In a damning denial widely overlooked by the mainstream media, the BBC’s reporter covering the “Trump dossier” stated that:

“A former CIA officer told me he had spoken by phone to a serving [Russian intelligence] FSB officer who talked about the [claims of Trump sex] tapes. He concluded: ‘It’s hokey as hell.’” (BBC, Jan. 12, emphasis added)

Another intelligence source explained to the BBC how these “kompromat” (compromising) stories are made up by Russian intelligence for reasons of ego and pride:

“One Russian specialist told me…that [Russian] FSB officers are prone to boasting about having tapes on public figures [such as Trump], and to be careful of any statements they might make.” (BBC, Jan. 12)

But the hostile anti-Trump media claim the opposite, and insinuate that the “Trump dossier” might still be credible by seizing upon any hint of interest by U.S. intelligence, such as FBI director Comey’s secret briefings. Comey, in turn, has nothing else to prop up his fast-fading case for investigating Trump’s associates except by the desperate grasping of straws within the fake “dossier.” No “smoking gun” has ever been found.

“We can wait till hell freezes over. The material is not verifiable,” says the Stanford University Russia expert in Forbes. That is because the “dossier is fake news,” he concludes.

Indeed, despite its flaws and absurdities, the BBC reports that the FBI has been using the notorious fake “Trump dossier” as its “roadmap” in its baseless investigation of purported collusion between Trump and the Russians to get Trump elected, and of other (phony) allegations of Russian “interference” in the election.

Such charges, prominently featured in the major media (about 200 articles on the fake “dossier” in The Washington Post and New York Times alone), are obviously a factor in President Trump’s low approval ratings at the 100-day point in his administration. Based on a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll, Trump would still beat Hillary if the election were held today, including by 43-40 percent in the popular vote.

Comey Must Go

In view of reports that the FBI relied on the discredited “dossier” to justify getting a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court warrant against one-time Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, Americans for Limited Government President Rick Manning issued a statement demanding that Comey either step down or be fired.

“The FBI’s incredible incompetence and outright complicity with the politicization of government spying removes the last shred of credibility that Director James Comey has and he needs to either resign or be fired,” said Manning.

Journalist Bob Woodward of Watergate fame called the “dossier” a “garbage document” and said U.S. intelligence chiefs (thus including FBI’s Comey) should “apologize” to Trump for promoting it. A British director of an investigations firm told Newsweek that the “dossier” is “bulls–t territory” and a “shoddy piece of work.” A U.S. intelligence official called it a “nutty” thing to report to the president.

The FBI attempted to pay Steele $50,000 to continue his phony pro-Hillary, anti-Trump “investigation” in October 2016, just before the election. But the increasing media publicity of the shadowy “dossier” forced the Bureau to slink away—until now—with Director Comey seemingly trying to breathe life back into the dead hoax.

Comey’s conduct is almost as bizarre as the wild charges in the “Trump dossier.” In fact, he has been promoting the “Trump dossier,” even as his own FBI and the rest of the Intelligence Community (IC) have been “distancing themselves” from it, according to CNN, no friend of Trump.

CNN’s report on this issue was immediately twisted around by Business Insider into a fraudulent headline that says the exact opposite, namely that “We just got a huge sign that the US intelligence community believes the Trump dossier is legitimate” (emphasis added). See AIM’s Special Report.

But after more than six months of investigation, the FBI admitted that the “Trump dossier” was totally unsubstantiated. According to The New York Times on February 14:

“One American law enforcement official said that F.B.I. agents had made contact with some of Mr. Steele’s sources.”

“The F.B.I. has spent several months investigating the leads in the dossier, but has yet to confirm any of its most explosive claims” (emphasis added).

Intelligence agency officials have consistently denied finding any evidence for such Trump collusion with the Russians, in the “dossier” or in any other material, such as NSA-GCHQ digital wiretaps of Trump associates, despite enormous efforts by the media to suggest otherwise—even to flagrantly contradict the media’s own reporting (see how Business Insider flipped CNN’s report, mentioned above, on its head).

But Comey is still promoting—not investigating or critiquing—the fake “dossier,” apparently to justify the Bureau’s use of the document as the basis for its investigation of Trump in the first place. Does Comey seriously believe that Russian senior citizens in Miami hacked the DNC?

Comey has become a major embarrassment to the FBI.

Next Up in Part Two: Where are the Sex Tapes?




Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.

Comments

  • Mark M.

    To quote one of your subhead, “Comey Must Go” … to prison, I’d add, and let his testimony be a long lasting reminder of the corruption and lies that have beset this country by enemies from within.

  • Supertx

    But yet, there has been no indication whatsoever that he or McCabe are going anywhere. Why not? You know there is a reason.

  • eingriff

    That’ll be the day, when we have the “final truth” about anything significant.

  • Richard Frick

    Soros money is the support for the witch hunt. Just look at Obama’s concealment of his entire life and his daughters. Soros is perpetuating the witch hunt to keep the truth about Obama and Killery from gaining any light. Truth be known, Comey is a Russian Operative.

  • JKH

    ?Chairman Chaffetz, at a committee hearing? last June?, told Comey he would be issued the ?referral? necessary to have the FBI investigate Hillary for perjury. She stated no classified info was sent or received on her private server which was contradicted by Comey. For what should be a clear cut case, why has this Oversight Committee failed to disclose their findings on this investigation in a timely matter?? Why has Comey not been held in “contempt of Congress” for failure to act on this referral for something that has already been concluded through previous FBI investigation??? Now Chaffetz has announced he will not run in 2018 and may resign before his term ends. Who is pressuring Chaffetz not to finish what he started with this FBI perjury referral ? ?

  • ItsJo

    Imo, I THINK his OWN AGENTS in the FBI, KNOW Comey was “following Obama’s Orders to Kick Hillary loose and NO CHARGES AGAINST HER.” He outlined ALL her actions, which WERE Criminal, then “said she did not do anything INTENTIONAL, so he kicked her loose, per Obama, Loretta Lynch, etal. COMEY IS DIRTY, AND HE NEEDS TO BE FIRED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP NOW!!! as also, CHARGES AGAINST HILLARY NEED TO PROCEED!! SESSIONS NEEDS TO DO HIS JOB NOW!

  • Bennie Bennett

    Is there anyone honest left in our government?

  • Gz7

    The question needing an answer is “why is Comey still the director?”

  • AltVoice

    Homie needs to Go Home… what a farce.

  • chris schmidt

    I think that given the incredible electronic communications gathering capabilities of the US Intelligence services and their almost certain weaponization under the Obama administration for “opposition research” purposes, any “odd” behavior is correlated in someway to the information that the DNC now has at it’s disposal for use against any “opposition”.

  • Dj Bermont

    That is the major question we are all dealing with. It’s clear that Trump and his family have lied many times, and continue to hide their business dealings. Congress has covers anything and everything becasue they are all being paid-off just to stay in office. No one with any sense is running the country. Half the cabinet members are pushing their own companies or wanting tax breaks for themselves.
    Trump and Russia? Who knows. But someone has to explain why Flynn, Manafort, Paige, Kushner, Sessions and several others on the Trump team all met with Russian agents and bankers during the election. Why was the the Rublican platform changed to be pro-Russia? Yes, where is the truth, honesty, integrity. Does anyone care?

  • Degoragon

    What makes this stranger, is that the members of 4 Chan’s /pol/ board say they were the originators of the fraudulent info in the “dossier”, as a prank on the mainstream media and the “Never-trumpers”.

  • intalecshul

    Still way too much of Kincaid’s typical Cold War-era Russophobia in this piece… Other than that, a valuable expose of the anti Trumper fraud

  • fourscoreandseven

    Have you EVER tracked the number of DEMOCRATS who met with Russians during the SAME PERIOD OF TIME?????

    No, you have not! Because, if you had, you would KNOW that there was a much greater preponderance of Democrats meeting (and with SOLID EXCHANGES OF MONEY AND INFORMATION) and you would not have been able (in good conscience) POST the nonsense you posted.

    Honestly, your double standards are DISGUSTING!!

  • fourscoreandseven

    Oh, for Pete’s sake, is that what you have decided all on your own? Your “purity” tests are that stringent? EVERYONE is indicted just because a FEW are rumored about?

    Would YOUR business, your line of work, your family be able to withstand this amount of RUMOR mongering?

  • The dossier can’t possibly be true since Michael Cohen claimed he was in L.A. from August 23rd to August 29th…. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/941fb74068514a659e9b3bce73867b6d59041038f70270e898aab9fe1e63ddc9.jpg

  • Emily Evans-Williams

    You are full of hockey pucks!

  • Emily Evans-Williams

    Full of hockey pucks

  • dogity dog

    The biggest injustice being committed out of all of this is that Commie, Shillary and Obummer are still walking around as free people and able to continue their crime sprees unabated.