|
History on trialCheck out scholar Deborah Lipstadt's History on Trial blog. It is a online companion to her book History on Trial: My Day in Court with David Irving. Lipstadt, an expert on the Holocaust, was sued in London (libel capital of the world) for calling Irving a holocaust denier. As the Boston Globe review reminds readers, Irving has called Auschwitz ''a legend" and once said: ''More women died on the back seat of Edward Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick than ever died in a gas chamber in Auschwitz." Because of the absurd UK laws governing such cases the burden of proof rests on the defendant to prove he/she has not defamed someone. In this case, the legal requirement was tantamount to proving the Holocaust happened, millions died, there were gas chambers and so on, as if it had never been proven before. An excellent article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette here. So how did it turn out? As the P-G notes, "David Irving set out to demolish Deborah Lipstadt. One year after the trial, Irving's wife and daughter wept on a curbside as liquidators seized their house, its contents, Irving's library. By the time Irving got home, he discovered that the suit he was wearing was the only one he now owned. On separate but related note, I wonder how many people know that playwright Rolf Hochhuth was apparently very good friends with Irving for decades. Hochhuth's play The Representative, or The Deputy (Der Stellvertreter), created a sensation in the early 1960's for its depiction of Pope Pius XII as having done little to help Jews during Hitler's reign. Scholars trace the flurry of anti-Pius books to this play. Hochhuth was known as a leftwing writer and ironically, former member of the Hitler Youth. (Acclaimed historian Michael Burleigh claims that Hochhuth was “influenced heavily by KGB malignancy towards the pope of the Cold War." For more on a recent discovery of a Vatican document on the issue see my column here. Note: It is not the position of AIM to defend either the 'pro' or 'anti' Vatican position, but to promote a higher standard in the mainstream media. Thus AIM is not assessing every argument made against Pius XII, but is arguing against the idea of presenting an unauthenicated document to the public, then vouching for authenticity by pointing to correlation between the content of the document and views that predated the discovery of the document.) From Mr. Irving's website: Hochhuth got in hot water after an interview he gave to Junge Freiheit [Young Freedom] on Friday, February 18, 2005 in which he called Irving "fabulous pioneer of contemporary history", an "honorable man" and "much more serious than many German historians". "Hochhuth spoke in defense of British Holocaust denier David Irving. He called Irving, who has been sentenced by a
Meanwhile,
Rolf Hochhuth (left) and David Irving, at the moment of their first meeting, January 25, 1965 -- forty years ago in the Stern magazine building, Hamburg |
|
|
|
© 2008 Accuracy In Media, All Rights Reserved. |
|
Web site design and development by |
|
Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let us know what you think of the web site. |