Now that the Marc Rich affair has opened your editor's eyes to the serious flaws in Bill Clinton's character, they should now report facts that they have suppressed for the past 8 years. This includes the strong evidence that he obstructed justice in the investigation of Vin-cent Foster's death. AIM had to buy space to get this evidence into the Times. The editors told your father that they didn't report it because they couldn't accuse the president of a heinous crime without very solid evidence. That suggests that they interpreted the evidence AIM provided as implicating Clinton in Foster's death. There is now over-whelming evidence that Foster was murdered and that TWA 800 was shot down by missiles. Since you are no longer protecting Bill Clinton, why continue to suppress evidence of his worst crimes?