Terrorist Intimidation: Witnesses, Jurors Protection Overlooked in NYC Terrorist Trial
November 20, 2009
November 20, 2009
Views expressed in guest columns do not necessarily reflect the views of Accuracy in Media.
Visit the complete Guest Column archives.
There Should Be No Fairness-Doctrine Secret Agenda
Guest Column | By Paul M. Weyrich | June 29, 2008
Off the record the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) says that it has no plans to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine. Nevertheless, earlier this month in a public letter to FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) charged that the doctrine was going to be re-imposed secretly upon broadcast media.
"Under the rubric of ‘broadcast localism’ it is clear the Commission is proposing no less than a sweeping takeover by Washington bureaucrats of broadcast media. The proposals and recommendations for Commission action contained in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking amount to the stealth enactment of the Fairness Doctrine, a policy designated to squelch the free speech and free expression of specifically targeted audiences,” wrote Boehner.
Begun in 1934 during the administration of President Franklin D. Roosevelt when AM radio was king, the Fairness Doctrine sought to ensure that radio listeners would get both sides of a political story by requiring that stations give equal air time to different opinions. In 1987, after nearly 40 years of enforcement, the FCC voted to halt the doctrine’s implementation when it had become obvious that the government’s monitoring of the media led to censorship. Radio since the 1980s holds no sort of communication monopoly as it did in the 1930s.
The press release which accompanied the letter from Boehner’s office notes, “The rules, proposed by the FCC earlier this year, would reinstitute advisory boards to regulate broadcast content and revive a host of other rules the Commission dropped more than 20 years ago.”
Sources at the FCC say that the only thing that has been circulated is a “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” and that outside comments are just now coming back to the Commission. They insist that no rule of any kind has been circulated, and they continue to work with the National Religious Broadcasters and fully expect to exempt noncommercial stations from any final order in order to protect small stations.
They add, “This is in no way a back door to the Fairness Doctrine. It is simply an attempt to get at big companies that are not fulfilling their requirements to the public in order to have their free license to use the public airwaves. There are localism requirements to use the public airwaves just like there are indecency rules. You have to have some relationship with the area in which you are licensed to serve.” They observe that some companies have been remotely operating in places like Los Angeles and are acting as if they were in small-town America. “We are still a long way from making any permanent decisions but this has absolutely nothing to do with the Fairness Doctrine.”
As if to take a pre-emptive strike at this assertion, Boehner notes in his letter that forcing the licensees to recreate the so-called “advisory boards” of a bygone era would encumber broadcast media with onerous bureaucratic burdens not faced by cable, satellite, or the internet. The report’s assertion that these boards would help radio stations “determine the needs and interests of their communities” or promote “localism and diversity” borders on fantasy.
So what’s the problem? Why all the anxiety? Why don’t Republicans in the House of Representatives accept the quiet assurances of the FCC and settle down? The answer, of course, is talk radio. It is the only form of communication that conservatives have through which they can certainly and consistently connect with the general public. Most major television and print media are dominated by liberals, but conservatives are successful on talk radio.
One may think that the liberals who dominate other media would be willing to overlook talk radio; they are not. H.R. 2905, the Broadcaster Freedom Act, sponsored by Representative Mike Pence (R-IN), is tied up in the House Energy and Commerce Committee waiting for a vote which may never come. The House Democratic Leadership opposes this legislation because it permanently would place the Fairness Doctrine in the ashbin of history, where it belongs. The Democrats want complete control of all media.
The FCC should make it clear to Republicans, Democrats and the public, as soon as possible, that it has no intention of reinstating the Fairness Doctrine in any way, shape or form. Also, the House Leadership should move H.R. 2905 out of Committee and give it a simple up-or-down vote on the House Floor. If they did, just about everyone might come out a winner.
Paul Weyrich is Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.
© This column is the property of the Free Congress Foundation and may not be reproduced without their permission. For comments and inquiries, contact Phyllis E. Hughes at (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Visit our website at http://www.FreeCongress.org.
Guest columns do not necessarily reflect the views of Accuracy in Media or its staff.
4 Comments | Post a Comment
Once again, this is being couched in terms of democrats rather than the very dangerous issue.
That is exactly what they want done. If they can put it in political terms - call it Democratic - then already half the voters will be for it - no matter how vile it is.
That is the way they get things done that are detrimental to this country. Some awful idea is put forth and all they need to do is label it, and we are off to the races arguing politics rather than the problem.
This is a despicable, dangerous, unconstitutional thing - let’s talk about that and leave the Democrats out of it. I don’t want to see the Republicans shuffle up to the microphone and say this thing happened, ‘because we are in the minority’.
This is scary stuff, folks, and unless and until we see so called Repubicans going on talk shows, writing op ed pieces, having town hall meetings, writing to their constituents, warning of this danger - we are going to have to assume they are in favor of it also.
We have already lost when we get sidetracked by discussing whether it is democrat or republican - we’ve lost.
This is nothing but a ploy by right-wing fear mongers so that they can fire off panicky op-eds and fund raising appeals.
June 30 at 10:14 am | #1 | Link
This “Fairness Doctrine” proves that the Democrats have more respect for Karl Marx’s “The Communist Manifesto” on his control of all levels of communications than they do toward the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
If the Democrats succeed with talk radio, what is next? The blogs, the Internet, Wikipedia (which I have been an editor since May 2006.)?