In a shameless glaring act of hypocrisy to rehabilitate Hillary Clinton’s presidential aspirations, the New York Times published an article doubling down on the Obama Administration’s lie that the attack on our consulate in Benghazi was due to an anti-Islam video.
Meanwhile, the NYT, Hillary and Obama have displayed a “Pat who” attitude towards Pat Smith, the mother of Sean Smith who was killed in the Benghazi attack on Hillary’s watch as Secretary of State.
What makes the attitudes of these superior, arrogant and pompous liberals so hard to stomach is that they falsely portray themselves as champions of women.
In reality, NYT, Hillary and Obama consider American lives acceptable collateral damage in furthering their socialist/progressive agenda; Obama’s vowed fundamental transformation of America.
Thus, the Administration stonewalling by refusing to release facts about what led to the death of Pat Smith’s son in Benghazi is par for the course – mere collateral damage.
Over a year ago, Hillary looked Pat Smith in the eye and lied to her face. So much for Hillary’s commitment to the sisterhood. Obama promised Pat Smith answers regarding her son’s death. Pat is still waiting for answers about what happened. But then, what else could you expect from a president recently awarded Liar of the Year?
Yes, liberals like the NYT, Hillary and Obama don’t give a rat’s derriere about liberal women that they can exploit to further their liberal agenda. Cindy Sheehan was a liberal darling until she could no longer further their cause. Then, Sheehan was thrown away on their pile of broken lives and dreams sacrificed for their agenda.
These people, NYT, Hillary and Obama are always railing about their phony bologna made-up GOP War on Women, all the while displaying a callous cold disregard for Pat Smith who has been simply seeking the truth about the greatest loss of her life. Thus, the NYT, Hillary and Obama are guilty of launching a war on a mom, Pat Smith.
My column is in response to the New York Times, which published a disgusting report on the Benghazi terrorist attack that attempts to whitewash the attack in order to rehabilitate Hillary Clinton’s political fortunes.
The New York Times know that the security failures, and then the lies and coverups over the attacks, represent a huge liability for Clinton’s presidential aspirations.
It’s inexcusable that the liberal media are dishonoring those who were killed and injured in the attack by lying about what really happened. It is unacceptable that the New York Times would lie to it’s readers and tell them that the attack wasn’t a planned assault by al-Qaida aligned terrorists, but instead was a spontaneous political protest over a YouTube video.
The media thinks they can rewrite history to suit their liberal political beliefs, and in doing so protect liberal political figures such as Barack Obama, Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton. They think that the American people will ‘forget’ the truth of what happened on that awful night on September 11th when Americans came under a violent bloody attack and no help came despite the desperate pleas by those who were facing imminent death.