-
Why Doesn’t Obama Ban Iranian Press TV? by Kenneth R. Timmerman
The Case of CH2M HILL: $2 Billion in Crony Stimulation by Rusty Weiss
The Truth about George Soros by AIM Staff
Lifting the Veil on WikiLeaks by AIM Staff
The Truth about Al-Jazeera English by Cliff Kincaid
Reaganomics and Obamanomics in the Media and in Reality by Malcolm A. Kline, Don Irvine and Spencer Irvine
How State Budget Battles Could Mean More Criminals Back on the Streets by Michael Tremoglie
Radical Muslims, Environmentalists and the Green Jihad by Mark Musser
Russian-Backed Propaganda Networks Claim Obama is a CIA Agent by Cliff Kincaid
Media Conceal True Nature of Flash Mob Racial Violence by John T. Bennett
NBC’s Mitchell Should Resign Over Telling Gaddafi’s Lies (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) by Cliff Kincaid
CASA de Maryland: The Illegals’ ACORN by James Simpson
Special Report
The Newswire
Take AIM Podcast
The White House defended its treatment of HuffPo blogger Nico Pitney at a presidential press conference on Tuesday.
From Fox News
The White House on Wednesday defended its treatment of a Huffington Post blogger the day before, insisting he was not a plant by the Obama administration.
“That was a question from an Iranian, in Iran, using the same type of manner and method to get that information as I guess many of you and virtually every one of your outlets has done, ” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said, adding, “because in this country we enjoy the freedom of the press.”
Gibbs insisted that no one in the White House preordained Huffington Post National Editor Nico Pitney’s question despite a senior administration official escorting him into the briefing room and President Obama calling on him second to the Associated Press reporter and by name.
“There was no guarantee that a question — the questioner would be picked, ” Gibbs said.
While the White House has denied in the past that they favor certain news organizations, many in Wednesday’s briefing said the perception was that the Obama administration pre-selected news organizations and questions in advance of every news conference, and that this just added to that idea.
In order to break the press corps of that “misconception”, Gibbs proceeded to ask almost a dozen reporters in the room if they had ever given a question into the White House in advance. The answer was a series of no’s, however, that did not stop many from questioning the White House’s integrity in the overall affair.
For its part, the White House says the question from Pitney was unlike any question other mainstream news organizations would have been able to ask because of his close connections to the protests in Iran and the underground blogging network that has been used to send out information within the country.
“In Iran, as many of you know, your colleagues have been dismissed, they’ve been kicked out,” Gibbs said in defense of the question. “Some of them have been rounded up. There aren’t journalists that can speak for the Iranian people.”
The White House has made a point of selecting journalists that are not part of the mainstream media for questions at his press conference and that has made even an Obama loving media suspicious of his motives and methods.
Post #2140
Share This
About the author
Don Irvine is Chairman of Accuracy in Media. He is active on Facebook and Twitter. You can follow him @donirvine to read his latest thoughts.
