Get our free daily email!
-

Why Doesn’t Obama Ban Iranian Press TV? by Kenneth R. Timmerman
The Case of CH2M HILL: $2 Billion in Crony Stimulation by Rusty Weiss
The Truth about George Soros by AIM Staff
Lifting the Veil on WikiLeaks by AIM Staff
The Truth about Al-Jazeera English by Cliff Kincaid
Reaganomics and Obamanomics in the Media and in Reality by Malcolm A. Kline, Don Irvine and Spencer Irvine
How State Budget Battles Could Mean More Criminals Back on the Streets by Michael Tremoglie
Radical Muslims, Environmentalists and the Green Jihad by Mark Musser
Russian-Backed Propaganda Networks Claim Obama is a CIA Agent by Cliff Kincaid
Media Conceal True Nature of Flash Mob Racial Violence by John T. Bennett
NBC’s Mitchell Should Resign Over Telling Gaddafi’s Lies (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) by Cliff Kincaid
CASA de Maryland: The Illegals’ ACORN by James Simpson
Follow AIM on Facebook
Special Report
-
Recent Articles and Posts
The Newswire
Take AIM Podcast







So the Dems want a SCOTUS that can “misspeak” in such a disgustingly racist/sexist manner.
Yes, that is a big deal, but take her entire judgeship into account. Over 60% of the decisions that she has made were overturned in a higher court. This shows that her thinking and approach is not about the Constitution of the United States but more about her “interpretation”.
This of course is absolutely against what the Constitution is about (Judicial Activism where subjective “feelings” give sway to actually living by the Constitution.
The Law is as the Law reads.
This woman is the worst possible choice and could be the most disruptive/destructive choice ever made.