Some how I wouldn’t expect anything different from the scum bags he parties with. Someone took a picture of BYonce holding a towel with the words F*** You, Bush at the inauguration,

When Birdie gets through in the Whitehouse, I imagine it will have to be totally sanitized before a decent person could live there. Or burn it down.

I did catch the next 72 days comment; curious if that was deliberately referring to the Islamic 72 virgins in paradise.  Like the 57 states he campaigned in or the 57 (OIC).

Wanda Sykes is entitled to her freedom of speech – as is EVERYONE else.  (Although, I don’t find her routines funny.)

And, frankly, at this point, I think I can probably go along with the “F***You, Bush” comment, too!

Personally, though, I think the whole event has always been “low class” – and is not far removed from one of the ‘70s Don Rickles and Dean Martin “Roasts”  – where the ostensibly “humorous insult” was de riguer.

(I also think making fun of Limbaugh’s illegal drug addiction is probably O.K., too – since, for years before his own drug abuse became public, he hypocritically and constantly railed in public against those who sold and used drugs – often spouting that there should be “zero tolerance” at every level and “all drug abusers should go to prison for a good long time”.  Plus – he spews nasty, personal, ad hominem attacks at those he disagrees with on a daily basis – so – you live by the personal attack – you die by the personal attack.)

TK,

Thanks for your response.  Rush has never been someone I listened to, even though I admire his courage some what for getting the truth out to people. He really isn’t doing much more than hundreds of other people of courage; i.e. Cliff Kincaid, Robert Spencer, to name a few.

But he was really put through the ringer (as he should) for his illegal drug use and I believe for the most part it was because he was a conservative, and as always, we have to keep a higher standard.  Millions of people did tune in his broadcast, he then becomes a threat to the neo-Marxist Media and the O admin..and of any course any one who opposes them.  Those ones on the frontline speaking out, I believe we should support to some extent.

I do wonder why he wouldn’t discuss the birth certificate issue or steath jihad.  When Islam is the most dangerous issue we face in America today.

Hey Sybil… WELL SAID!!
Now, if only TK is intelligent enough to understand what you did say!!

WLW, thanks for the back up. 

Leftys using and twisting “freedom of speech” could be the down fall of a civilized society.
It is one thing to have the freedom to think as you want but to use it as messengers of propaganda to shape national policy is the epitome of deception and seduction. There is a difference between propaganda and shaping policy with the truth of who this NPD-tin-pot dictator in the Oval Office really is.

This wasn’t meant to be comedy or even entertainment, it was to influence the koolaid drinkers, elevate Obama and discredit Rush to anyone stupid enough to believe her.

Gibbs is a liar..a nurd too. what a pick. and this CFR administrtion just took over for the last..doesn’t many see the monster’s right foot being part of the left yet? if now the mess will get worse..I say throw all the bums out and start all over..otherwise Hitler’s plan will win. if we don’t se that by now..we are finished. talk is cheap, we need action..other wise the hell will continue till America is not free and is so broke and all the nations will own us lock stock and barrel..With china owning 60% and Islam the rest..and America just putting up with it..they all have shown us the are dictators who do not care what we want..votes? phony,,rigged..Here we have them selling us out and the UN is here and the world gov under Isalam is coming down like a fast train..next your guns and then complete control..Just think of the lies on global warming. had we drilled 30 yrs ago we all would be well off, but people have to care about liberity and freedom…Dont’ forget, Obama said, when the talk gets to bad, I will stand with Islam and one other time,,my muslim faith slipped out of his mouth on TV..and Christian ,,,hardly..

Re: Post 5;

Your comment:

“…This wasn’t meant to be comedy or even entertainment, it was to influence the koolaid drinkers, elevate Obama and discredit Rush to anyone stupid enough to believe her …”

You know, and the eight of these events held during Bush 43’s adminstration did EXACTLY the same thing … discrediting DEMs, the Clintons, Democrats in general, etc. … with the purpose of propagandizing “anyone stupid enough to believe” in the GOP’s variety of Kool-Aid.

It’s the curse of mind-numbing, ideological partisanship.  One who lives by bulls**t partisanship dies by bulls**t partisanship.

Personally, I think the ever-increasing level of, at least to me, “hateful” political partisanship in this country is a bigger threat to successful and effective American government than any foreign terrorists could be.

And, keep in mind, political provacateurs, whether on the left or the right, do what they do – - for $MONEY$.

On the subject of Barry the Usurper –

I guess I’ll play the part of the person in the crowd that shouted out “He’s wearing no clothes!”, while the emperor is on a procession, naked.

For all this talk about Barry’s supposed charisma, speaking talent, etc. coming from the media and both sides of the political isle, I just don’t get it.

I consider myself open-minded when it comes to acknowledging charisma and/or gifted communication skills. I am a believer of the policies espoused by Ron Paul, yet have to admit that FDR, JFK, and Ronald Reagan all possessed that rare combination of a skilled oratory delivery and undeniable charisma, even though I disagreed with all three, policy-wise.

To me, this detestable character currently infesting the White House, possesses the charisma of a street thug from a project area in a large city. The lack of charisma aside, he doesn’t look the least bit presidential and totally out of place.
In fact, I would compare him to the scenario of a fireman’s helmet being placed on the head of a petite, unqualified, newly-hired, female affirmative action employee in the fire department, only to see the hat fall half-way down her face.

A total embarrassment!

TK,

Bush is gone:  GET OVER IT.

Welcome Back Carter (and Clinton, FDR)

Jokes I would like to hear about Obama:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=97688

Re: Post 9;

And, in four or eight years, Obama will be gone.  So – what’s your point?

Re: Post 8;

And – you were NEVER “embarrassed” by George W. Bush?

(BTW: It’s pretty obvious that you’ve never come across a “street thug from a project area in a large city.”  If you had – you’d realize just how silly that comment was!  Obama’s persona and appearance, like him or not, is just about as far away from that of “a street thug” as it could be.)

TK – (post #11) – “And – you were NEVER “embarrassed” by George W. Bush?”

Now, how did I guess that you’d be the first one to go to the defense of Barry, TK?
(I guess it was pure ‘genius’ on my part)

The reason for my not bringing up G.W. Bush’s persona to ridicule, was that the media and entertainment industry sufficiently took care of that themselves during his two terms, and for good reason. Bush was an utter embarrassment, with his lapses in the middle of his sentences, then looking off to his side with a stupid blank expression on his face, before gathering himself together to finish the sentence.

But with Barry, and his apparent inability to articulate without a teleprompter and stuttering all over the place, that same MSM and entertainment industry are silent.

In reading your numerous posts over the past several months , it’s obvious to me that you are an avid follower of the daily political news cycle and must be aware of this double-standard. What troubles me about you, TK, is your lack of fair-play concerning this topic by needlessly bringing up Bush, despite the justifiable ridicule he did receive during his two disastrous terms because of his bumbling persona.

I think you’re also well aware, from my postings, that I despised Bush’s policies and had castigated Bush-bot defenders such as Limbaugh and Hannity for their partisanship, and therefore, have no motive to be protective of him.

For all your claims of being an ‘Independent’, the pathological, reflexive nature of your defense of any negative criticism of Barry, makes it painfully obvious that you are not politically, who you claim to be.

There is nothing more boring than trying to discuss issues with a predictable, close-minded ideologue, who for the sake of credibility, disguises himself of who he really is within a forum.

I, for one, will heed my own advice that I gave to JerryC in another thread; to not bother dialoguing with you again, TK. It would be pointless and a waste of my time.
Life is just too short for that.

[By the way, if my description of Barry’s persona resembling a street thug from the projects is a little too strong for you, then how about “a scrappy-looking youth/agitator from the projects?”

That’s about the best that can be described of this ineligible, racist, Marxist punk, and it would take more than him wearing a suit and tie to eradicate that persona.]

Re: Post 12;

Your comment:

“… By the way, if my description of Barry’s persona resembling a street thug from the projects is a little too strong for you, then how about “a scrappy-looking youth/agitator from the projects? …”

A “little too strong”?  Completely laughable is more like it.  And – I did say – Obama’s persona and appearance is about as far away from that of a “street thug” as anyone could be.  (Obviously, you’ve never been around any big city “projects”.)

Your comment:

“For all your claims of being an ‘Independent’, the pathological, reflexive nature of your defense of any negative criticism of Barry, makes it painfully obvious that you are not politically, who you claim to be.”

You’re entitled to whatever personal opinion you choose to hold and to justify it in whatever way (correctly or incorrectly) you choose.  But, you certainly have no personal, firsthand, accurate knowledge of anything about me – and your fanciful statment above is just – bullcrap. “Pathological”? “Painfully obvious”?  Silly.

You comments:

“…Bush, despite the justifiable ridicule he did receive during his two disastrous terms because of his bumbling persona…”

“…Bush was an utter embarrassment…”

AGREED!  Correct!  So, you see, I don’t think you’re ALWAYS silly!

On the other hand: “…ineligible, racist, Marxist punk…”  Silly.  If you really have differences with the guy, one would think that an intelligent and responsible adult would probably have a more sophisticated way of expressing it (???)

But, hey, whatever makes your boat float.

re – post 13 (from the one and only TK)

A weak, evasive, and childish response. Saying duh, duh, and duh would have been more intelligent.!

One of Lenin’s ‘useful idiots’!!

Whoever accidentally dropped this low-life on his head when he was an infant really did a disservice to mankind!!!

YIPPIE!!!  As his fellow commies would say back in the day!

Re: Post 14;

And YOU are right up there – with a strong, direct and adult response here???

And, of course, your post clearly indicates that YOU are NOT an “idiot”? NOR a “lowlife”? NOR a “disservice to mankind”?

And, how would YOU know what “fellow commies would say back in the day”?  You don’t seem to really know much about anything – except posting anonymous and extremely mini-minded and childish personal insults.

Grow up.
_______________________

Re: AIM Moderator:

If you don’t think this garbage post is off-topic, as well as an ad hominem attack as described and as disallowed by your posting rules, then you should consider throwing those rules out.

TK

TK – <<“And YOU are right up there – with a strong, direct and adult response here???”>>

Yes. It was very adult of me exposing your weak, childish response.

<<“And, of course, your post clearly indicates that YOU are NOT an “idiot”? NOR a “lowlife”? NOR a “disservice to mankind”?>>

Yes. I am not an idiot.
Yes. I am not a lowlife.
Yes. I am not doing a disservice to mankind.

“And, how would YOU know what “fellow commies would say back in the day”?

By watching documentary’s about radical mentors of yours, such as ‘yippies’ Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin.

“You don’t seem to really know much about anything – except posting anonymous and extremely mini-minded and childish personal insults.”

I take it then, that you’re not anonymous?
‘TK’ is the name your family and friends know you by?

As far as your crying to the AIM moderators, TK, I’m sure they’re also aware of your right-wing extremest/ideologue insults that you consistently throw around at anyone disagreeing with your left-wing extremist positions.

Like most far-left hypocrites, you can dish it out, but can’t take it back. (pathetic)

Re: Post 16;

Blah, blah, blah.

As I already suggested – grow up.

RE: post #17 –

The Obamabot is telling the adult to grow up. (He’s getting more bizarre with each new posting.)

Re: Post 18;

Has anybody actually ever confirmed that self-description of “adult”?

What seems bizarre to me is that personally nasty, name-calling and fully-addicted Dittoheads would call others Obamabots – apparently believing that being a Dittohead is somehow essentially different in its nature to being an Obamabot. (???)

The logic of an extremist ideologue?

RE: post 19 – “Has anybody actually ever confirmed that self-description of “adult”?

As an obamabot, you’re unqualified in doing that.

The rest of your blather in post 19 confirms the rumor that ‘bad acid’ did circulate at the Woodstock Festival, after all.

Re: Post 20;

MORE Blah, Blah, Blah!

(Think an Obamabot is worse than a Dittohead? And, I guess it was a “rumor” ONLY if you weren’t there!  But, what the hay!  We just got rid of an alcoholic president – so, who knows what role “bad alcohol” might have had over the last eight years?)

RE: post 21 – “But, what the hay!  We just got rid of an alcoholic president – so, who knows what role “bad alcohol” might have had over the last eight years?”

Former alcoholic compared to former coke-head?
I guess time will tell.

Maybe the guy who hid his medical records during the 1990’s can be the referee.