Despite the very profitable ($1 million x 10 years = $100 million) Big Lies spread by algore and other shameless Mighty Mouses (meesiz?) (heeeeeere I come to saaaaaaave the daaaaaayyyy! Mighty Allll is onnnn his waaaaaayyyyyy!), and the fact that like Joe Btfsplk of Lil Abner fame, or Mary and her little lamb, everywhere algore goes a blizzard is sure to follow.
Never mind the fact that cooling will be a disaster to mankind, and warming a boon. If we are into a 70 year cooling cycle, it’s possible algore & Co. may get what they seem to want: A mass die-off of humans. Whatever will Crazed Sex Poodle do then? Who will maintain his jet? Who will massage him? Who will worship him? Who will listen to him?

That’s it? I was expecting more. One study? One man’s findings? Is AIM aware of the dangers of cherry-picking facts/studies/people that suit one’s current opinion? Let me ask AIM this question: What are the findings of the overwhelming majority of climatologists on this issue? The answer to that is far more significant than any one man’s findings.

I’ve read and heard from a great many sources that scientists/climatologists who’s data does not support the “man made global warming theory” face losing their positions and research grants by those in government who are determined to rake in millions of dollars through climate change legislation. Just because the crooked government and their lapdog liberal media dotheir best to report one side with data adjusted to support their agenda and squash any reports and evidence that discredits them doesn’t mean this is an isolated report. There is much evidence that discredits the man made global warming theory. We’re just not allowed to hear most of it.

With global temperatures at record levels, and the decade of the ’00s the warmest decade in recorded history, it is simply absurd to claim that climate is on a path of global cooling.

Also, J Cosmology is hardly a leading climate journal, whether it’s peer-reviewed or not. One paper does not establish scientific truth.

Finally, it’s a myth that the ’70s was filled with stories of cooling. There was, in fact, a range of media stories (and not all that many, frankly), but more importantly, even then the scientific concern was about anthropogenic global warming. See

“The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus”
by Thomas C. Peterson, William M. Connolley, and John Fleck, BAMS, AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY September 2008, p 1325-1337
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1

When are men and women going to start listening to G-d who tells us in Genesis 8:22 that the seasons will never change and the flood like Noah will never happen again. ???? Anything else is fear mongering, lies and a big money maker..

I have read that sunspots are basis for deciding global temperature rather than man-made intervention. How much man-made global warming is a factor,
I don’t know. Also I read we have more to fear from Global Cooling than Global Warming. Al Gore and like business investors along with the corrupted climatologist will never bring that factor to the forefront. That is not what they have set their business up to fix.

Dr. Lu is wrong both on his “facts” and his science.
The average global temperature has not decreased since 2002. This past decade was the hottest on record, and for most years in this past decade the global temperature was higher than the year before. One cannot select data.
The earth is massive. If the concentration of greenhouse gases were to be increased to a new level and maintained there, the temperature of the earth would increase gradually to a new ‘equilibrium’ in 50-100 years. The immediate response of the temperature to changes in the concentration of CFCs, that is, his strong correlations, is proof that CFCs are not the main source of global warming.

[...] research was published in the Journal of Cosmology. More info at Accuracy in Media (FYI – some comments are openly skeptical about the research [...]