
An unsigned 1990 Harvard Law Review article that was written by Barack Obama sheds some more light on his abortion position.
From the Politico.
As president of the Harvard Law Review and a law professor in Chicago, Senator Barack Obama refined his legal thinking, but left a scant paper trail. His name doesn't appear on any legal scholarship.
But an unsigned — and previously unattributed — 1990 article unearthed by Politico offers a glimpse at Obama's views on abortion policy and the law during his student days, and provides a rare addition to his body of work.
The six-page summary, tucked into the third volume of the year's Harvard Law Review, considers the charged, if peripheral, question of whether fetuses should be able to file lawsuits against their mothers. Obama's answer, like most courts': No. He wrote approvingly of an Illinois Supreme Court ruling that the unborn cannot sue their mothers for negligence, and he suggested that allowing fetuses to sue would violate the mother's rights and could, perversely, cause her to take more risks with her pregnancy.
This isn't earth shattering news and will likely have very little effect on the campaign, but it does provide some more background on Obama's thinking since there is so little to go by.
August 23 at 8:09 pm | #1 | Link
That’s right! Everyone knows that being head of the Harvard Law Review is proof positive of stupidity and ignorance! But you have “unearthed” the truth! Where was it buried; how many feet down? Did you have to use a shovel or did you use your hands?