-
Why Doesn’t Obama Ban Iranian Press TV? by Kenneth R. Timmerman
The Case of CH2M HILL: $2 Billion in Crony Stimulation by Rusty Weiss
The Truth about George Soros by AIM Staff
Lifting the Veil on WikiLeaks by AIM Staff
The Truth about Al-Jazeera English by Cliff Kincaid
Reaganomics and Obamanomics in the Media and in Reality by Malcolm A. Kline, Don Irvine and Spencer Irvine
How State Budget Battles Could Mean More Criminals Back on the Streets by Michael Tremoglie
Radical Muslims, Environmentalists and the Green Jihad by Mark Musser
Russian-Backed Propaganda Networks Claim Obama is a CIA Agent by Cliff Kincaid
Media Conceal True Nature of Flash Mob Racial Violence by John T. Bennett
NBC’s Mitchell Should Resign Over Telling Gaddafi’s Lies (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) by Cliff Kincaid
CASA de Maryland: The Illegals’ ACORN by James Simpson
Special Report
The Newswire
Take AIM Podcast
FNC host Bill O’Reillyanswers 10 questions from Time magazine readers.
Here are a couple.
Have you ever changed your mind on an issue as a result of an interview you’ve done? Ben Doty, SYCAMORE, ILL.
I am open to hearing [a subject's] point of view, but I must tell you that we are very thoroughly researched. It’s not Larry King, with all due respect to Mr. King. When I come in, I come in armed and dangerous. But if somebody impresses me, I’ll think about it more, and if I change my mind, I’ll tell the audience.
Everyone calls you a conservative, but you classify yourself as independent. Why? Stephen Wells, TORONTO
I hold some traditional conservative positions, absolutely, but I hold liberal positions as well. When I go out on the street, the real conservatives look at me askance: How come you’re not attacking Obama? How come you believe in global warming? But that’s never picked up by the left-wing media
To me he still sounds egotistical.
Share This
About the author
Don Irvine is Chairman of Accuracy in Media. He is active on Facebook and Twitter. You can follow him @donirvine to read his latest thoughts.
5 Comments for OReilly is ‘Armed and Dangerous’
Bill is just a Hype Freak on Methadone selling the usual Bushit and Sex America thrives on. Problem is his Shite is weak and Pherimones are stale.
Egotistical? That’s an understatement.
O’Reilly is the only person I’ve ever seen do an interview, then broadcast a follow up show with the high points, followed by inviting a series of guests to tell all of us what a great job O’Reilly did.
The man makes Rush Limbaugh seem humble.
I never was a regular viewer. He turned me off after watching him a few times. He hits me as
very egotistical, a verbal bully overtalking his
guests constantly, and with such an arrogant “superiority” air about him. If he is
“armed” it is with ego; and if he’s “dangerous”
it would likely be to his guest’s eardrums.
I DID WATCH HIM, intentionally, when he had
Obama on. Talk about a 180 degree turn, LOL LOL.
Obama must have shown the lion the whip & chair
before airtime, because all I saw of O’Reilly was a mewing kitten. I really DID laugh out loud.
Did O’Reilly interview Obama more than once?
I saw the highlights of an O’Reilly/Obama interview last night, and Obama looked like a deer caught in the headlights.
Bill is definitely NOT conservative. He is clearly an old-time Democrat. He tries to be fair and balanced, but he is not.
He is afraid of the homosexual crowd (that is more liberal than old-time Democrats) – never see him mention that the practice is deviant behavior and leads all who practice it to shorter – sadder – less healthy lives.
He definitely is for government intervention – and proud of it. He does not base ‘right and wrong’ on an ultimate truth – merely on tradition which is totally weak.
He calls it a culture war – but that is to dodge that there is a battle between good and evil – and good is not tradition, it’s God and evil is not liberalism – it’s whatever is against God and His revealed plan according to the Bible.
Bill doesn’t see this – but it doesn’t mean he is not the best TV news has to offer. That doesn’t mean there isn’t better possible – it’s just that there is not anything any better available now.
But with all his titilation and voyeurism journalism, I have to exit early before most broadcasts are done. He has a dozen reasons he does that stuff – it’s not just a hold-over for him from his initial TV work.
But then, this is just my opinion. I wouldn’t want to get on his bad side – but I could get there pretty quickly I think – and I wouldn’t be on the liberal bad side . . . he has plenty of room on his right.