Typical.  The Dems only love the CBO when that organization agrees with their proposed numbers.

Since it’s inception, the CBO has been more accurate and fair than any other accounting firms Dem Presidents of the past have used. I have never heard of a Republican President complain. Even when Bush 43 was asked about the cost the CBO assigned to his programs, all he did was show surprise, and said; “If that is what the CBO says, then I take them at their word for the work they have done.

Clinton choose an Independent Accounting Firm where he had friends to be his version of the CBO, they showed Clinton with a surplus so several “Billion” dollars, if that is true (and he CBO said it was impossible) then why were we in a recession at the end of his eighth year, and handed it over to Bush 43?

If anything, the CBO is low-balling the numbers, in a study by the Wall Street Journal, they asked and received past CBO numbers, which showed what each president and their passed spending bills against the CBO numbers, and were constantly within the margins of -.5 to +2.5% of their projection, the (WSJ) printed the number side by side.

I want this Kenyan born President out of office before any of this takes place.

Whether the cost is $1 trillion over 10 years or $2 trillion over 10 years – that translates to only $100 or $200 billion per year – a relative pittance in terms of the U.S. budget – and an amount MUCH LESS than the ongoing costs of the Iraq adventure over the last 6-7 years.

And, whether politically-correct or not, much of that amount can probably be gained by reducing annual foreign aid grants to other countries.  Likewise, much of NASA funding is a giant waste.  And, it would be natural to impose a deduction from participants’/recipient’s paychecks in much the same way social security and medicare payments are deducted.

The problem is that the various vested interests don’t want their particular budgetary largesse to be reduced! But it seems to me that $100 billion should be able to be rounded up annually pretty easily by cutting back and/or eliminating waste and many less-necessary expenses.

America First!

If Cap and Trade, and Universal Health care both or either, it will cost $4 Trillion (CBO numbers).

Even more if the does another stupid thing such as bailing out States. California got themselves into the mess, they have the power to get themselves out as well. They just need to cut all the illegal alien crap. They have also lost an 85 mile strip of farm land due to a supposed rare minnow, which if the care so much could be captured and moved to Lake Meed or any other lake. But instead the shut the water off to the farmers, thus loosing valuable farm land.

Re: Post 4;

Uhh, that’s Lake “Mead”, Mr. Ramble and Babble!  As in M-E-A-D.

And – “loosing” is also wrong.  The correct word is L-O-S-I-N-G.  Only one “o”.

(You know, I think one ought to be held liable here for correct spelling, at least for the simple words, don’t you?)

You should know, you have the worst spelling on the Internet, and the most untenable grammar anyone has ever seen, or should I post the links?

Just ask anyone who have been around your many other posts.

Re: Post 6;

An absurdity.

It’s amazing how a supposedly educated person (?) can willfully misrepresent and fabricate to the extent that you do – and then come to a point where you are able to convince yourself to believe in your own drivel.

Outlandish?  Hallucinogenic?  Drug-addled?  Mental disorder?  Who knows.

This particularly asinine post of yours unequivocally proves the point.

Get some help or, at the very least, stop obsessively-compulsively putting yourself in situations where you accomplish nothing but embarrassing yourself.

http://www.aim.org/don-irvine-blog/fox-news-clobbering-the-competition
Post 36:
Yawn…hockey puck, are you still blathering?

From the Oxford Dictionary:

liable
  • adjective 1 responsible by law; legally answerable. 2 (liable to) subject by law to. 3 (liable to) likely to experience (something undesirable).

How many times do I have to explain to you denseness that the term has more than one spelling. The last definition I listed was from Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary.

Liable from the Encyclopedia:
Responsible- Having legal responsibility for something, especially costs or damages for slander et. al.

From the Encarta Thesaurus:

Libel:
liable, legally responsible, responsible, accountable, accountable…

Oddly enough, the Thesaurus says verbatim for Liable.

<laughing> We learned this in Grade School, or did you make it that far? I’ll save this post so every time you bring it up, I will re-post it again.

You are just upset because we have corrected your English so many times in almost every post you have made. It is one thing to know the truth, completely another to fabricate the truth.

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/global_warming_hype/2009/07/03/231842.html?s=al&promo_code=82C0-1

Fox News interviewed S. Fred Singer by Chris Wallace on Sunday regarding his expertise on so called “Global Warming”. The only other television news to mention the letter was on CNN.

We also know that obama and the left are Fascists/Socialists: Such as Hitler in 1933 and Mussolini in 1935

http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Fascism.html

As an economic system, fascism is SOCIALISM with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful COMPETITION, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary MARXISM, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. ENTREPRENEURSHIP was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.

Much more in the article…

Re: Post 8;

Your (as usual, wrong) comment:

“… Libel: liable, legally responsible, responsible, accountable, accountable …”

So, you still think that’s the definition of “libel”?

I really do feel sorry for you.

But, I also recognize that your embarrassments are self-inflicted.  So – all I have to say about you is … “Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum”.

I will repeat from post to post, where this subject was never talked about, you still post the same thing in an attempt to show me up, right?
———————-
As I said: “From the Encarta Thesaurus”:

Libel:

liable, legally responsible, responsible, accountable, accountable…

In fact I have used both words, as do many lawyers.

The biggest difference is I do not call you names in every post, I used the hockey reference from C.Roy’s comment, and you damn well know it…

This is getting old and pathetic that you cannot help yourself.

you should not be allowed to even have use of a computer.

At least try and stay on subject, or AIM will stop all posting again, is that what you want? If so, then you would not have anything else to do.

Re: Post 11;

So, haven’t found the correct definition of “libel” yet?

Keep working at it; if someone should sue you for “liable”, you’d really want to know the difference, wouldn’t you – because, hey, if you were sued for “liable”, you could probably count on the suit being thrown out, couldn’t you – or, that the whole thing was just a joke?!?!

Post 12:

As I have mentioned in more than one thread (which all your accusations are off topic), I have sued and won a Defamation of Character and won, I am not used to repeating myself tk. I am sure from all the explanations I have provided on this subject have also looked into this, yet not one objection, but rather agreement.
———————————-
As for obama and his disliking the CBO numbers, every President since the independent CBO was incorporated, with the exception of Clinton and obama. The have prefered to hire their own auditing firms who agree with them.

obama used biden yesterday to admit they had the numbers wrong on the economy…Gee, ya think so?

Re: Post 13;

Find a dictionary (not a thesaurus) – look up the definition of “libel” – write it down on a piece of paper – and, then, type it in the little box down below.

No repeating – simply your posting of a generally-accepted definition of “libel” – FOR THE FIRST TIME!

P.S.

Did you ever have to deal with a senile old lady on some totally off-the-wall issue?  Or a vengeful ex-wife?  Or the most immature of out-of-control childen?

tk #14; You just crossed the line, Bud. Attacking me is one thing, but our direct families are, and always will be off limits.

FYI, I have been married to the same lady since I was 24, as for my Son, he could teach you a few things about respect.

Shameful and pathetic…

Re: Post 15;

This post of yours clearly shows how slow you and your lack of comprehension really are!

I think one with even the most basic of functional I.Q.s would have gotten the idea that the rhetorical questions in my “P.S.” were actually inferring what DEALING WITH YOU was like:

I.E.,

1.) “… dealing with you was like dealing with a senile old lady on some off-the-wall issue…”

2.) “… dealing with you as like dealing with a vengeful ex-wife…”

3.) “… dealing with you was like dealing with an immature, out-of-control child …”

Get it, Wesley???

DEALING WITH YOU is like dealing with a senile old lady or a vengeful ex-wife or an extremely immature child!

Get it???

You know, I keep telling myself that it’s the medical treatments and medication that’s causing all the rambling, babbling, misapprehending, misunderstanding, contorting of facts, misrepresenting and obsessive/compulsive bickering – - because I don’t think any person who has an average I.Q. and is the recipient of a typical American education could possibly misconstrue and misperceive things the way you do – - unless, of course, you do it on purpose to achieve some personal end which is totally inexplicable to me. (???)

If you’re doing it on purpose – give it up!  You’re only embarrassing yourself.

If it’s the medical issues – make some appropriate adjustments when and how you post.

And – I am no longer sympathetic nor prone to simply take your b***s**t because you may have certain medical or other “challenges”.  As I’ve said – you keep poking – and I will poke back!

Post 16:

Can’t take what you dish out, that is clear.

You also have a problem staying on topic. YOU change the topics by attacking others, so deal with it…

Re: Post 17;

Baloney!

(And, did you know, the third Oscar Meyer, of the original baloney-producing family, just died today!  Now, there’s a real icon for you!)

<smiling> Thinking of you mentioning Oscar Meyer and wieners, a perfect match.

Re: Post 19;

Poor comprehension?  Poor retention?  Poor attention span?

Your comment: “…you mentioning Oscar Meyer and wieners …”

I only mentioned “BALONEY!”

And I’ll repeat it for your benefit

Baloney!

(See how you misconstrue, misrepresent, misstate and manufacture a supposedly real-world “fact” ???)

Post 20:

Did you not read my post #8? I not only gave you a dictionary definition, but an encyclopedia, and a thesaurus for liable.

There is the proof, I do not owe you anything else, in fact I didn’t owe you anything at all. If you do not have the mental lucidity to stay on subject, then I am finished with this thread, you are the type who gets beat and take you ball home with you.

Ma’a as-salaama Sadiqi

Re: Post 21;

The original issue was that you DID NOT KNOW the definition of “libel” – and the supposed “definition” you provided for “libel” in your Post 8 above, i.e., in your very words, “… Libel: liable, legally responsible, responsible, accountable, accountable …” is WRONG!

For the record, you have provided NO DICTIONARY DEFINITION of “libel” and you unintelligibly keep dancing around your own misuse of the word “liable” when the context in which you were using the word indicated the word you should have been using was “libel”.

You regularly engage such misconstructions in your posts – and then you go on and on, ad nauseum, trying to cover up the misstatements, misrepresentations, mistakes, etc., with even more inane posts.

And the only thing you “owe” to anyone here is a little bit of intellectual honesty and some accuracy and factuality in your posts.  What you may owe yourself is another matter.

Yada, yada, yada…In other posts I substituted definitions for libel and liable, they are pretty much the same, the proof is in my postings.

Step it up, you dwell on things obsessively.

Re: Post 23;

Your statement:

“… In other posts I substituted definitions for libel and liable, they are pretty much the same …”

So, to you, “libel” and “liable” are pretty much the same?

(And, I would suggest that you’re the compulsive-obsessive one here).

Get a grip – and make some adjustments.

Post 24 does not require to be taken seriously.

Re: Post25;

Neither should “Wesley In Dallas” (or Houston, or wherever he may be) EVER be taken seriously.

Well, if anyone is interested…

Noun: libel

  1. A false and malicious publication printed for the purpose of defaming a living person
   
  2. The written statement of a plaintiff explaining the cause of action (the defamation) and any relief he seeks

Verb: libel (libelled,libelling, or [US] libeled,libeling)

  1. Print slanderous statements against
    “The newspaper was accused of libeling him”

(This is from wordwebonline, and is the definition of ‘libel’ as I’ve always recognized it.)

Oh, and just because lawyers use a word, doesn’t mean it’s gospel, eh?

Chryss,

I have posted that definition, and one for liable both in the same post. I also found that liable is a synonym for libel.

Therefore you are most certainly correct.

Re: Post 28;

“… I also found that liable is a synonym for libel …”

Ridiculous.

Stop obsessing, it isn’t healthy.

Re: Post 30;

“… Stop obsessing, it isn’t healthy …”

You should know.

P.S.

Should we go back and review your criticisms of my apostrophes in contractions – which you claimed were in the wrong places?

(You come across like a developmentally-challenged child who is incapable of making rational responses to anything.)

Sore Loser…Ha!

Re: Post 32;

As is obvious from many posts here, especially YOURS, that it is the extreme right-wing ideological partisans who are the “sore losers” – those who just cannot accept that a Democratic black man and a Democratic Congress are running the show!

Well, according to the DHS, I am a right-wing extremist although all I want is a smaller government and a stronger military for our protection (and not for “nation-building”).  I can accept that “a Democratic black man and a Democratic Congress are running the show”, after all they were elected through our constitutional election process.  I cannot accept that, since FDR and probably earlier, the power of the executive branch has been growing like crazy.  What’s with all the czars, anyway?  And not just the current administrations, either.

Post 32:

tk, how many times must I tell you that if J.C. Watts (a Black man) would have easily gotten my vote, so get off your low horse and never try to obfuscate your obvious sly way of calling me a Racist. Man, you do have class, but as I have said before, it is all low class.

Re: Post 35;

You just made another one of your patently stupid posts, that’s all!

You call me the “sore loser” – while you have also persisted, for a year, in calling me a “Democrat”, a “liberal”, an “Obamabot” or a “lefty”!

If I’m all those “left-wing things” you INSIST I am, Mr. Bassackwards, then – I WON – didn’t I?  And calling me a “sore loser” would then be pretty illogical (if not downright stupid), wouldn’t it, Wes?

So – in the end – you’re WRONG AGAIN – all around!  Either I’m NOT a “sore loser” – or I’m NOT a “Democrat”, a “liberal”, an “Obamabot” or a “lefty”.

“Obfuscate”?  That seems to be YOUR primary area of expertise.  (Or, maybe you just don’t know any better???)

Post 36:

Still off-topic, I see…

But just off the top of my head, you have called me:

*Stupid
*Ignorant
*A Liar
*A Plagiarist
*Developmentally-challenged child who is incapable of making rational responses to anything
*Poor comprehension
*Poor retention
*Poor attention span
*1.) “… dealing with you was like dealing with a senile old lady on some off-the-wall issue…”
*2.) “… dealing with you as like dealing with a vengeful ex-wife…”
*3.) “… dealing with you was like dealing with an immature, out-of-control child …”
*DEALING WITH YOU is like dealing with a senile old lady or a vengeful ex-wife or an extremely immature child! *(You repeated that one in the same post)
*Outlandish
*Hallucinogenic
*Drug-addled
*Mental disorder
*Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum
*You’re probably the number one cause of Global Warming (Which is a myth, according to REAL Climatologist, NASA, NOAA, and many more scientist than Gore ever used, and has made millions of dollars off this scam)
*Degenerate
*Dear Mr. Empty Net and Mr. Wash Out
*I realize you’re incredibly slow
*And, go poke yourself!  R-E-A-L good!
*Your post includes a lot of fantasy and comments which are unintelligible to me. (Due to the fact you do not understand intelligence)
*Your (absurd) statement
*Absurd
*Self-loathing
*Failure
*Your post is incoherent to me (Smartest thing you have said)
*Ridiculous
*Get off your middle-school self-puffery, Wesley! (And your damned “Czar” fetish!
*You’re a tedium – like an ADHD child.
*As I’ve said, Wesley, you expel an awful L-O-T of hot and humid air
*Your ability to perceive signs of mental disability.
*Like dealing with a difficult child!
*Mr. Dense
*Mr. Non Compis Mentis
*Tiresome
*Boring
*Tiresome, boring and a waste of time
*YOU do not RECOGNIZE YOUR shortcomings
*YOU are “Tiresome”, WIDer!
*YOU are “Boring”, WIDer!
*Try as you might, you’re “Oh-Fer”, WIDer, “Oh-Fer”!
*I have no hostility, WIDer. *(Yeah, right)
———————-
And that is just this an two other recent posts, it is much worse in those earlier threads.

These are just some of you comments to “me” and dose not include the insults you have equally made to everyone else.

Many people resort to hostility when confronted with the truth, you have never backed up one single claim with a link or point to a source.

You claim to have written in your vote, so why do you accept and believe everything obama says, and agreeing with liberals?

Time after time, all the other posters here think you have completely lost all control, or think of you as a “nut-case”.

Just for the record, I am not your type (I like women).

Re: Post 37;

Your list sounds about right.

If I had the time or inclination to go through your posts (but I really do have something else to do every day), I have no doubt I could come up with at least an equally-long list – and if I included all your, shall we say, misrepresentations of reality, it would be a way, Way, WAY L-O-N-G-E-R list.

Anyway, I kind of like:

“… DEALING WITH YOU is like dealing with a senile old lady or a vengeful ex-wife or an extremely immature child!…”

and

“… Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum …”

And, your comment:

“… You claim to have written in your vote, so why do you accept and believe everything obama says, and agreeing with liberals? …”

I didn’t vote for Obama.  I don’t like a LOT of “Obama things”, e.g., his selection of Sotomayor; the fact he even responded to the Gates affair in his news conference – and quite a list of other things.

BUT THE GUY IS THE PRESIDENT – WE ARE IN A S**THOLE CREATED BY THE LAST GUY AND HIS CLOWNS – AND THERE’S N-O-B-O-D-Y E-L-S-E IN A POSITION TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS OR REVERSE THE DAMNED DECLINE – - SO I F-R-E-A-K-I-N-G HOPE THE DAMNED GUY SUCCEEDS – FASTER RATHER THAN LATER – BY DOING W-H-A-T-E-V-E-R MIGHT WORK!!!!

WE NEED A-C-T-I-O-N N-O-W – AND HE’S THE GUY IN THE CATBIRD SEAT – SO I FEEL IT’S MY PATRIOTIC DUTY TO TRY TO SUPPORT HIM IN HIS EFFORT AS MUCH AS MY PERSPECTIVES, MY SENSIBILITIES, AND MY PREFERENCES WILL ALLOW ME!

AND – IN MY OPINION – THE EXTREME RIGHT-WING NUTCASES WHO SPREAD OBAMA-HATE ARE UNAMERICAN – AND THE CURRENT CROP OF GOP LEADERS DO N-O-T-H-I-N-G BUT MINDLESSLY CRITICIZE AND SAY “NO!”.

And, Wes, be honest:  I could provide you with hundreds of links and thousands of sources – and your closed-minded partisanship would cause you to spend the next million posts here blathering on and on how EVERY ONE of those sources had “liberal bias” or some such.  You’re a blind partisan – no links and no sources will EVER suit you; the ONLY links and sources that you will EVER accept are those right-wing ones that peddle the kind of propagandistic stuff that you’re already predisposed to be willing to believe in.

And – as I’ve said many times – a lot of people here DO NOT WANT TO HEAR ANYTHING THAT DOESN’T COMPORT WITH THEIR PRE-EXISTING OPINIONS – so they attack and insult the messenger.  Every time they do that – I’ll attack and insult back.  That should be simple enough for ANYONE to understand.

And if you don’t like my opinions or my positions on issues raised here – ignore my posts!

In your case, you post an awful lot of your (and your fellow partisans’) assumptions and suppositions as “fact” – and/or you post some really tortured interpretations as “factuality”, e.g., the whole birth certificate thing – and, often, those posts are nothing more than unfounded right-wing propaganda you picked up elsewhere.  When I see what seems to be unsubstantiated or totally manufactured garbage – or – as someone else here described as “deteriorating intellect” and “lack of open-mindedness” – I’m going to jump in and criticize it.

And, Wes, really!  I couldn’t care less what other people think of me personally as a result of whatever I post here – especially if they’re dyed-in-the-wool, far right-wing rockheads who post nothing but pure garbage here themselves.

I like your list, though!  Reminds me how difficult it is not to become repetitive.  Judging by the length, I guess I’m doing pretty well on that score!

I said it before: You give it up – I’ll give it up!

Post 38:

tk, it would be nice if you would take an objective view, then and only then would you realize I am not being all that partisan. You do the same thing you accuse me of, you only believe what you want to believe. If you trust the Mainstream Media, you will never know the truth.

If you were able to have an open mind, you just may learn what the rest of us already know, but you are already to Biased to learn anything new, or the truth. Regardless of what party you belong to, you have a liberal mentality.

I am actually proud of the Democrats standing up to the President, Pelosi, and Reid.

I agree with a top Professor who works for the FDA who said, “In God we trust, in everyone else, show me the data. When I do just that, show you the data, you call me a “link master” which is about the only way to prove what you have written, or the point one is making. Every time I have asked you to back up your claims, you have yet to provide a single thing which proves you correct.

In essence you are very much like the MSM, you say things which are not true, and cannot back them up with any evidence. I firmly believe your single mindedness is why the AIM members are against you, that and your name calling problem. Do you not believe that every story has two sides? That was what the Framers meant when they gave wrote in the Constitution when they granted Freedom of the Press, they trusted that there would be fairness in the press. If the Framers were alive today, there would be another revolution, and not just because of the MSM.

We are losing our freedoms every single day in this once Great Country, and it has only become worse over the past 20 years, and even more so in the recent past. Never before have we had such a lopsided set of freedoms. We are all supposed to be equal, yet it is worse than ever. The single largest group being discriminated against, are White Christian Males.

There is a single thing which would have made this country better should have been done 50 years ago…Term Limits for The House and Senate, when they leave office, it is wrong to continue to pay their salaries and their golden insurance.

In obama’s last presser during Prime Time, when a reporter asked obama if he and his family would go on Government Health Care should it be passed. His answer was no, he stated he would pay whatever it took to have the best care possible. So, why should we be any different?

tk said: “In your case, you post an awful lot of your (and your fellow partisans’) assumptions and suppositions as “fact” – and/or you post some really tortured interpretations as “factuality”, e.g., the whole birth certificate thing – and, often, those posts are nothing more than unfounded right-wing propaganda you picked up elsewhere.  When I see what seems to be unsubstantiated or totally manufactured garbage – or – as someone else here described as “deteriorating intellect” and “lack of open-mindedness” – I’m going to jump in and criticize it.”

That statement makes you much more of a partisan than the rest of us here. The REAL propaganda is coming out of the President and the far left than anything we can say.

You only make things worse, by getting everyone off the topic of the story with your criticisms, which leads everyone into areas we would not be posting if you had kept your mouth shut and stayed with the story at hand. You are the one causing the mess in the first place.

Speaking of Partisanship, you are just as, if not more guilty than anyone here. It only goes to prove you cannot have a civil debate on the story. If you do not like what AIM posts, the go the Daily Kos or Media Matters where people will agree with you all day long. I have seen those types of sites, you are perfect for those sites. What really makes it better for you to be there is, there is no intelligence required, only skewed opinion, and full of profanity and lies.

I have yet to see anything you have written is either hateful and full of unsubstantiated statements. Like it or not, we have the right to post what we believe. I see you as a Keith Olbermann want to be…

Did you see any of the Sotomayor confirmation hearings? Al Franken received his opportunity to question Sotomayor, do you know what he was talking about when he had the floor. How as a child how much he enjoyed Perry Mason and compared her to a fictional character, what the hell was that all about. The democrats were so embarrassed, they cut his 30 minutes to 5 minutes. The ultra leftist host; Bill Moyers, who was against Franken as being an embarrassment to the party. Moyers may be left wing, but he is intelligent, halfway through the interview, Franken walks off the studio set. When he (Franken) was asked if he knew, as a US Senator if he knew the 27 Amendments (including changes made) to the Constitution, he was only aware of the 1st and 5th Amendments. Moyers replied that to be a US Senator, he should learn by heart all 27 as they would come up from time to time. One should at the very least have gone to and graduated college, Franken never went to college. Who is next, Sascha Baron Cohen, who plays the character, Borat? (<laughing…I had to look that up)

Here is where you really lost it:

“BUT THE GUY IS THE PRESIDENT – WE ARE IN A S**THOLE CREATED BY THE LAST GUY AND HIS CLOWNS – AND THERE’S N-O-B-O-D-Y E-L-S-E IN A POSITION TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS OR REVERSE THE DAMNED DECLINE – - SO I F-R-E-A-K-I-N-G HOPE THE DAMNED GUY SUCCEEDS – FASTER RATHER THAN LATER – BY DOING W-H-A-T-E-V-E-R MIGHT WORK!!!!

>>ALL economist agree the economy tanked due to the Housing Meltdown due to the Sub-Prime Mortgages, other than the $350 Billion he spent on Bailouts, which I repeat all Republicans were against. Sub-Prime to those who cannot even get credit to buy a car and pay for it, were allowed to buy houses regardless of their credit rating. Then the foreclosures started, too many too soon is what caused the meltdown, or are you that dense?

Bush 43 at least opened the Feds Records, something Obama will not allow, so what is he hiding. I am sure you do not want to know, but I do, as do most democrats.

You would then know the truth about CCI (ACORN’s Shell Company) and the truth about Goldman Sachs, which would start a rebellion. <<

WE NEED A-C-T-I-O-N N-O-W – AND HE’S THE GUY IN THE CATBIRD SEAT – SO I FEEL IT’S MY PATRIOTIC DUTY TO TRY TO SUPPORT HIM IN HIS EFFORT AS MUCH AS MY PERSPECTIVES, MY SENSIBILITIES, AND MY PREFERENCES WILL ALLOW ME!

AND – IN MY OPINION – THE EXTREME RIGHT-WING NUTCASES WHO SPREAD OBAMA-HATE ARE UNAMERICAN – AND THE CURRENT CROP OF GOP LEADERS DO N-O-T-H-I-N-G BUT MINDLESSLY CRITICIZE AND SAY “NO!”.”

>>Do you not think that every proposal the GOP offers is denied, and that they are completely left out of the process, so how can they accomplish anything. It is my fervent hope that the Health Care proposal is defeated before the 2010 mid-term elections, when Republicans will gain seats in both Houses.

If Americans were aware of what Cap and Trade would do to EVERY American, people would be calling for impeachment. In a sick way I hope it passes…That guarantees a GOP Control of Both Houses, and possibly a GOP President. Cap and Trade is reversible, but not so easy if Health Care were to pass, but he has his own party against both, standing in the way. Democrats have control over both Houses, and cannot push Obama’s tax and spending Bills through. His poll numbers are falling like a lead balloon. Even Bush had higher ratings at this point in time than does Obama.

You haven’t even heard that more US soldiers were killed in a single day total, than Bush ever had in a single day…52 deaths. Just as bad is our soldiers are required under Obama to read them the Miranda Rights, possibly the most stupid thing I have ever heard. Especially to Terrorists without a Country, nor will they abide by the Geneva Convention.<<

Upon news that the Health Care Bill was not going to be passed early last week, the Dow has soared, I bought in at 8,124…and will short sell if it looks as though the Blue Dog Dems are being forced to change their minds. Several who have voluntarily gone on Fox News telling stories of being threatened by Pelosi, Reid, and Obama himself.