Accuracy in Media

For the second year in a row, and third out of the last four, being a newspaper reporter ranks as the worst job in America.

The Jobs Rated Report has been compiled by CareerCast since 1988, and ranks 200 U.S. jobs based on a wide range of criteria that includes income, outlook, environmental factors, stress and physical demands.

Just ahead of newspaper reporter is the job of logger/lumberjack, which finished at number 199 for the second straight year after being dead last in 2014.

Another media-related job—broadcaster—came in at number 198, with an equally glum outlook for the future.

For some people leaving the news business was a sigh of relief, according to CareerCast:

‘The news business has changed drastically over the years, and not in a good way,’ says former Broadcaster Ann Baldwin, president of Baldwin Media PR in New Britain, Connecticut. ‘When people ask me if I miss it, I tell them ‘I feel as if I jumped off of a sinking ship.’’

Baldwin’s time in the media, working at TV stations in the Rocky Mountains as well as Hartford, Connecticut, helped prepare her for her new career—providing public relations solutions and crisis management for businesses.

Even though job losses in the print and broadcast news business have generally slowed from a few years ago, both groups are still under intense pressure to rein in costs and improve profits.

CareerCast’s outlook for both newspaper reporters and broadcasters predicts negative growth of 9% through 2024, which means that these high stress, low paying, jobs are likely to remain among the worst jobs in America for the foreseeable future.





Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.

Comments

  • Nicknjax

    I think many of the TV personalities make several million/year.

  • Steven Barrett

    True, being a print reporter doesn’t allow the … drumroll here, please Journalist … the chance to make nearly as much money as the usually better looking, better dressed, sometimes better smelling idiot-box repeaters, but it’s not all that bad. I used to be one for a small town western Massachusetts weekly which also had a lot of academic readers, and nothing beat the pleasure of walking into a local eatery or store and a lot of the local “best n’ brightest” sniff their noses and scurry towards the exit signs. And, there are those time when the stories write themselves for you; hence, the old adage, “beats working” certainly packed some humorous clout. But don’t believe even that old joke. Television reporters and editors don’t have to do all the reporting, some photo taking, editing, composing headlines, and making sure the paper heads “to bed” for the printing the next day and all the “jump lines” and other thousands of nagging details are taken care of. God help you if you misidentify two prominent men who died in the same week, one white and one black on the same obit page. Well, that didn’t happen in my reign of errors, but it nevertheless did occur, and mistakes like this happen all over and all the time. Dollar for dollar, I’ll bet small town publishers get more bang for their “print reporters” who still have to write the full news copy, not just a “lead’s worth” of the old who, what, where, how and why information that the televised and reporters seldom bother with save for just enough info to keep their bosses free from libel suits.