Accuracy in Media

New York Times public editor Liz Spayd criticized the newspaper on Saturday for preaching diversity, but not practicing it in the newsroom:

“The Times can be relentless in questioning the diversity at other institutions; it has written about the white ranks of the technology sector, public schools, police departments, Oscar nominees, law firms, legislatures, the major leagues and the Ivy League. Fixing its own problems comes less easily

The newsroom’s blinding whiteness hit me when I walked in the door six months ago. It’s hardly a new problem here, but it’s one that persists even as the country grows more diverse and The Times grows more global. The head of that global expansion, Lydia Polgreen, was one of The Times’s highest-ranking African-American editors until she left last week to lead The Huffington Post. Her departure hit the whole newsroom hard, but it was especially a blow to many minority journalists here.

In the past three months, I have interviewed people across the newsroom about the issue of race (and to some degree gender, which I’ll address in a future column). I’ve spoken with journalists of all racial and ethnic identities, in jobs high and low: white men and black women, editors and reporters, department heads and news assistants. It left me believing there is a level of frustration bordering on anger that would be institutionally reckless not to address.”

Spayd noted that only two of the 20-plus reporters who covered the presidential campaign for the Times were black, and there were no Latinos or Asians in the pool, making it less diverse than President-elect Donald Trump’s cabinet. She added that all six members of the new White House reporting team are white, as are most of the reporters in the Washington bureau.

The disparity exists throughout the paper, from the Metro section to the sports department, according to Spayd.

Spayd also noted that even though executive editor Dean Baquet is black, all the other editors on the masthead are white.

The Times isn’t alone in the diversity battle. Spayd cited figures from the American Society of News Editors showing that the Times is less diverse than large papers like The Washington Post (31 percent), The Los Angeles Times (34 percent) and The Miami Herald (41 percent), but ahead of The Boston Globe (17 percent) and The Philadelphia Inquirer (14 percent). She feels that the Times should be a leader, not a laggard, on the issue.

Even though I personally find the diversity movement a bunch of nonsense concocted by liberals to make it appear that they actually care about racial equality, it’s amusing to see the nation’s leading liberal newspaper falling short of the mark while criticizing others—especially conservatives and Republicans—for the lack of diversity in their ranks.

The Times should take a long look in the mirror before deciding to comment about the lack of diversity in other places.





Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.

Comments

  • sox83cubs84

    The New York Slimes is well on the road to irrelevancy.

  • David

    Typical Liberalspeak–Do as we SAY, NOT as we DO!

    Yet another reason to NOT believe ANYTHING they publish any more!

    Of course, it’s also very telling what a “revolving door” there is between the various Lamestream “Fake News” Outlets. Lydia Polgreen, the editor she mentioned, left the Times to go to the Huffington Post? Maybe she was too liberal even for the Times because the Huffington Post makes the New York Times look a little less radical by comparison.

    There’s still more liberals in the world than conservatives and they ALL read the New York Times so it will be a while before it loses its relevancy. Maybe if the new President pulls their Press Credentials and makes them and the rest of the loony liberal press get their stories from Fox News and Breitbart, they would lose more of that relevancy faster.

  • BakkenBill

    I’m all for diversity, provided a person is hired and promoted on their credentials and not their ethnicity. True, an African American journalist will see things in a different light than an Anglo white, Asian, or Latino. Where in liberal whites lean far further left than others.
    Now with Twitter, however, I doubt any MSM will be necessary for information coming from Pennsylvania Ave. At least not for the next 4 years.

    I’m watching and waiting.