‘Morning Joe’ Could Use a Jolt
By Don | November 18, 2009
MSNBC's Morning Joe ratings are slipping at just the wrong time for the cable network.
From the NY Observer
Joe Scarborough held up a copy of The New York Times. It was Monday, Nov. 16, and earlier in the morning The Times had published a piece about Newsweek, which had recently laid off 13 staffers. Quarterly ad revenue at the newsweekly was down 48 percent versus last year. That said, according to The Times, things were looking up. In the third quarter, The Washington Post’s magazine division, largely comprised of Newsweek, lost only $4.3 million, a major improvement over the first half of the year.
Mr. Scarborough put down the newspaper and looked over at Jon Meacham, the editor of Newsweek, who was sitting across the table in the Morning Joe studio. “It’s a very positive article, congratulations,” said Mr. Scarborough. “I know it’s a rough time for everyone in print right now.”
Mr. Meacham nodded. The Times article, said Mr. Meacham, was a vote of confidence for everyone in the news business, like Newsweek and Morning Joe,
who was fighting the good fight and producing serious journalism. Mr. Scarborough agreed. He was committed to the mission. Hard news, politics, intellectual rigor. MSNBC had made a bet, said Mr. Scarborough, that audiences would reward them for steering clear of tabloid fodder. “We don’t dumb down here,” said Mr. Scarborough.
On Monday’s program, one similarity between Newsweek and Morning Joe was left unspoken—namely, that both are catering to significantly diminishing audiences. Newsweek has lowered its rate base twice in the past two years and will do so again in January. Likewise, Morning Joe is struggling to hang on to viewers. So far this fall, from Sept. 1 through Nov. 13, according to The Observer’s analysis of Nielsen numbers, Morning Joe has averaged 357,000 total viewers and 124,000 in the 25- to 54-year-old demographic—down 35 percent and 43 percent, respectively, from the same time period last year.
Of course, Morning Joe is hardly the only cable news show to suffer a steep decline from last year’s election high. But over the past eight months, Morning Joe has been slipping not only in overall ratings, but also relative to its competition. Not long ago, Morning Joe—like MSNBC’s prime-time lineup—was seemingly well poised to push past CNN into the No. 2 position in cable news (Fox News’ Fox & Friends maintains the top position by a wide margin). To wit: In March of 2009, MSNBC executives announced that Morning Joe had topped CNN’s American Morning in the demographic for the entire month—the first such victory for the network’s morning programming in more than seven years. At the time, MSNBC press releases regularly referred to Morning Joe as “the fastest growing cable news morning show.”
These days, it looks more like the fastest shrinking.
The first two weeks in November have been particularly rough. Morning Joe, during this stretch, has averaged just 315,000 total viewers and 102,000 in the 25- to 54-year-old demographic—and while the show remains competitive in total viewers, it is now regularly finishing in fourth place in the demo, not only behind American Morning (397,000 total viewers; 149,000 in the demo) but also behind Headline News’ Morning Express with Robin Meade (303,000 total viewers; 190,000 in the demo).
“We want higher ratings, and we’re going to get them,” MSNBC’s president, Phil Griffin, told The Observer on Tuesday morning. “It ebbs and flows with what’s going on in the world. But I think 2010 is going to be great for us.”
The morning cable show isn't the only one struggling for ratings. Scarborough's radio program was pulled last month in Washington, D.C. from WMAL which is owned by his syndicator Citadel Communications.
Scarborough will survive for now because MSNBC doesn't have anything better to offer in the morning slot, but his days could be numbered.
Post #2466
4 Comments | Post a Comment
Newsweek - utterly no-class tabloid. Putting Sarah Palin’s Runner’s World picture on their front page seals it for me.
You reckon they’ll put a picture of Hillary Clinton or Janet Napolitano in shorts on their cover? Wonder what that would do for their circulation.
I watched Joe when he first got the show but he turned into the mushiest RHINO I have ever seen. He seems to be trying to impress Chris Matthews. He needs to just go away.
They need to drink more coffee and get some caffeine in them and some serious journalism energy. They are pitiful. So boring I can’t watch.
They need to get back to grassroots “watchdog” journalism. That’s why they are failing ,,,and they deserve to. That’s what people want - traditional media. Not a patsy for the gov’t !!!
They are so stupid, they deserve to fail.
November 18 at 4:16 pm | #1 | Link
NEWSWEEK has become so offensively and ridiculously openly partisan (they would say in their own venacular—a JOKE as far as serious news goes!)that it is worthless as news. I now throw my current copies directly into the trash as I receive them, and will never again renew my subscription. Ditto for TIME (which seemed even more Leftwing if that is possible) although my final subscriptopm to TIME ran out several months ago. One expects some slant to the news as long as it is reasonable—one wants some balance and some insight into the Left, but these publications have gone beyond the pale. (And I used to like Meacham! Perhaps he should rename NEWSWEEK to NEWS FROM THE LEFT and be done with it. )