Olbermann is a classless name caller who has nothing of substance to say and hates that his lies get exposed, so all he can do is like a schoolyard bully, call names and threaten.  He’s a lousy sportscaster and even worse newsman.  He needs to be off the air, permanently.

This is what the Democrats do, they call you racist, bigot and everything they can think of to try to shut you up. Well like the Santa Clarita City Councilman and Jamiel Shaw Sr., a black man whose son was killed by by an illegal alien while his wife was in Irac, said “I’m proud to be a racist, because that’s what they (the democrats) call Americans who care about this country”. They should be called deceitocrats, because that’s what they’ve become, people who are full of deceit. They don’t discuss the issue because they can’t, so they call you names to discredit the messenger. Well it’s not working anymore. Call me a racist, bigot or anything else but I’m going to speak the truth and you can’t stop me anymore with your name calling. The democrats have no more power with their words.

Truth be told, there is marginal difference between the two major parties. Do a little research in history and Economics and you’ll find that the two party system has come about and is perpetuated by the fact that most folks want the same thing, the same system, but in the end, there must be an election and in order to have a winner, there needs to be at least two parties represented. The parties need to differentiate themselves, ever so slightly, because, while they’re both targeting the median voter, they also need to have a unique selling proposition.

The Olbermann man-child brat bully needs his big fat ugly mouth washed out with a bar of Lye (lie) soap !

To Diane # 4,  How about this idea. Take a large bar of laundry soap,put it in a long sock,swing it like a slingshot or bolo,& hit KO right in that
big mouth of his. this way you kill 2 birds with 1
large bar of soap. It is something to think about.
It’s just my opinion. ha-ha

Netbook Author,

So true what you say.

The Republican Party’s origins was borne from the big government, interventionist philosophy of Alexander Hamilton and his Federalist Party, which was the antithesis of Thomas Jefferson’s limited, constitutional government philosophy as represented by his Democratic-Republican Party. The Democratic Pary eventually ‘sold its soul to the devil’ and became the big-government entity it is today with the election of Woodrow Wilson.

While highly unlikely that the modern Democrat Party will return to it’s limited-government, Jeffersonian roots, there could be a revolution within the Republican Party with the emergence of the Tea Party movements.

A good example of your “marginal difference between the two major parties” viewpoint, is the fact that Reagan and Newt Gingrich were life-long admirers of the policies of FDR.

What does that say?