What can we do?  Obama has bought the MSM and the rest of the internet blogs.

But we can still do better!

We will go house to house and chuch to church using print materials.

Google has been known to lean left, although they try to keep it quiet. I’m just glad my blog isnt on Blogger! WordPress and Typepad are better anyways…

He will never shut my mouth. I’ll keep digging and sending it around the Internet. I’ll talk until I run out of breath. I will not stand by and watch my country go down the gutter. I get cold chills down my spine when I see that communist standing there talking about religion.

What do you expect from Goggle and the two little snot nosed liberals that created it. Liberals are so gullible. They are sold on this man hook, line, and sinker. I don’t care how many times Barak Hussein Obama denies it, he is a Muslim.  There is no christianity in this man, he is a deceiver.  He will bring this nation down if he is elected, and if he is elected I believe he will be assasinated. If this should be the case there will be fighting in the streets, black against whites. This man frightens me as do the people backing him.  “Wake up America” NOW!!!

It could also be Obama supporters doing it….two can play this game.  See http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/google_shutting_down_antiobama.html

Have some of our fellow citizens lost their minds. America must be the only country in the world that falls over backward to give newly-arrived aliens more rights than we receive. A college student needs an assistant dog for his classes; but he can’t have it because some Muslim can’t touch dogs!! An Indian woman in Florida won’t have a driver’s license photo with her face showing because it violates her religion!! A school in California insists its American students read the Koran!! Another does away with the Pledge because it might ‘offend’ a few!! Other examples are just as insane. As for the liberal public officials who sanction this crap, are we losing our country? Are the immates taking over the asylum? A vote for Obama is a sure vote to continue this insanity. John McCain has some deficits, but the alternative is total disaster for our once great country. VOTE McCAIN!!!!

Walter Audubon said,

“Have some of our fellow citizens lost their minds.”

Is this a rhetorical question?

I’ve often wondered about Google and politics. I do two blogs. One leans conservative. The majority of search referrals to that blog are from Yahoo. The other blog doesn’t focus on politics and culture; it’s newsier. That blog’s largest number of referrals are Google. I optimized both sites, btw, in accordance with Google Webmaster tools.

It’s scary, to think a search engine might lean politically, but look at the attention given to the far left blogs and sites. It certainly makes you wonder.

One of the reasons my political blog is hosted on an offshore (England or Scotland)server is that the operators there could not care less about taking sides in US politics.

They also provide prompt and personal help when needed.

Some of the commenters here are confusing the Google search engine with Blogger, which is owned by Google. Search engine results can be spoofed and biased by a number of techniques. As an example, Google the words “French military victories” (without any boolean operators or quotes, and hit the “I’m feeling lucky” button. This particular gag has been there for several years now.

Irony:
The Search feature on this very AIM page is a Google Custom Search.

This is another indicator of trying to use “Net Neutrality”, the Internet version of the “Fairness Doctrine” which is nothing more than censorship.

The radicals are marching in and I suspect that they will get violent after the November 2008 elections. Google’s anti-Obama censorship is one of the steps in bringing in “The Messiah” (like what they stated about Gorbachev in the late 1980s) to power.

Chris, one of the best sources of info on “neutrality” is http://www.cybertelecom.org/ci/neutral.htm. And it suggests that part of the problem is the looseness of the definition of the term.

In all honesty, I do not understand the “Fairness Doctrine” argument, either. I worked for a NPR station during the Watergate hearings. In those days, the F.D. was in place, yet I do not recall any attempt to balance coverage of the Watergate burglary. We broadcast the Congressional hearings from gavel-to-gavel, but there was not a single minute that I recall devoted to a defense of Nixon, Liddy, et. al.

Conversely, since this Fairness Doctrine was abandoned, every last Presidential speech has been followed by a broadcast in which some member of the opposing party—usually its most extreme fringe—attempts to repudiate what has just been said. So it seems to me that we’ve had more of an operational “fairness doctrine” since the actual rule was repealed.

This new push by the left seems dangerously devoid of details. There is a reason that Limbaugh, Michael Savage, the Salem Radio Network gang and local non-liberal talkers predominate: they are the ones whose shows attract advertisers. Nobody asserting the need for a renewed fairness doctrine has offered an idea of how it would work in the real world. First, there’s the matter of classifying a talk program as liberal or conservative; that in itself neglects the fact that many so-called conservatives are actually libertarians. Second is the matter of implementing this balance. Would a station carrying Limbaugh be required to carry, say, Randi Rhodes or Tom Hartmann? And since the process is driven by advertising revenue, would that mean that the number of hours that of Rhodes’ show that could be sold to advertisers would set the limit on the number of hours of Limbaugh’s that could be broadcast?

There is danger in the air whenever politicians—on either side of the aisle—start talking about “unity.” Our form of government was set up to be a noisy, contentious process; that’s what separates it from outright tyranny.

Regarding violence after November 4th, I share your fears. Should Obama be defeated—especially by a close margin—we will see a re-enactment of 1968. Should Obama win—especially by a wide margin—the same group of radicals will perceive his victory as carte blanche to run roughshod over anyone and anything they perceive as outside the “progressive” sphere.

I don’t believe Senator Obama is experienced enough or astute enough to have anticipated this. And since he will have no legal authority between November 4 and January 20, the party currently in power (in the executive branch) will be forced to deal with the violence. This, of course, will be spun as an attempt to keep the party of Bush and McCain in power.

It’s going to be ugly, no matter what.

On the Fairness Doctrine, isn’t this a violation of the constitutional amendment protecting freedom of speech? Basically, if the FD returned, the government would in a sense be dictating what a network or station would be required to air.

And I agree on the November problem. Obama supporters already refer to him as president in formums and other community sectors. I don’t think he’s experienced enough to deal with it either.

Hi, Walter Audubon
The horrible things that you described in your post about the “inmates taking over the asylum” are all happening under a moderate Republican administration. What makes you think it’s going to get any better under another moderate Republican administration?
A radical like Obama will head us toward the edge of the cliff at 100 mph, while phony, country-club Republicans will do it just under the speed limit.
We are in this predicament right now because a lot of well-meaning, yet naive, Republican voters chose the ‘lesser of two evils’ strategy instead of voting for true conservatives such as Pat Buchanan during the 1990’s or Ron Paul during the present campaign.
In the 2000 election, I reluctantly chose the ‘lesser of two evils’ strategy by voting for Bush, after Buchanan who I supported in the 2000 primaries, ended his campaign during the general elections. After seeing all the mischief the Clintons got away with, I just couldn’t stomach more of the same with an Algore presidency.
Four years later, after watching Bush turn his back on the Conservative forces that helped him get elected, I sat out the 2004 elections.
Better to have an obvious enemy in office than a supposed ally who stabs his supporters in the back.

I have always liked and respected Pat Buchanan, but he shot himself in the foot when he ran for president on a ticket with a radical black woman whose views were mainly opposite his own. As for Ron Paul, many years ago I admired his many good votes. But anyone who says we were responsible for 9/11 has to be regarded as somewhat kooky, along with Charley and Whoopi. For those with doubts I suggest reading 102 Minutes for detailed information on every aspect of the air attack.

Walter Audubon,

You brought up a great point about Buchanan’s poor choice of a running mate, however, compared to the two-party globalist monopolies that have been running this once great country into the ground, I still would have voted for him, had he not dropped out. Buchanan has a forceful, take-charge type of personality that never put himself or his Pro-American ideals on the defensive. I’m sure he would have kept his VP on hold from doing any damage with the limited political power that she would have had as VP.
After watching the ‘Republican Establishment’ attack Buchanan so viciously after he beat Bob Dole in the ‘96 New Hampshire primaries, I knew then that he was the real deal and that the rest of them were Rinos.
As for Ron Paul and his views about 9/11, I agree with his isolationist views. The fact that we have our troops spread so thin all over the globe has been an abject failure. The more we stick our noses into other countries affairs, then the more we are hated worldwide and more prone to being attacked.
I, myself, would not bet my life that our government was caught off-guard on 9/11 and that they may have let the terrorists pull it off. After all, why has Bush refused to secure the borders after such a catastrophe? Wouldn’t it be easy for a Muslim terrorist to shave off his beard and cross the border as a Mexican?
Also, I found it kind of suspicious that of all places that a President can be at, when informed about the attacks, would be reading a book to a kindergarten class. Man, that’s about as innocent a scenario that can be conjured up as one of the darkest hours of this country’s history was unfolding.
Going back to the borders…It seems that the majority of Americans, especially after 9/11, want to see the borders secured, but most of the politicians don’t seem to be the least bit concerned about any potential danger from leaving them open. We, the People, seem to be the only ones worried about this over the past 7 years. The only conclusion I can draw is that either they’re playing a life-or-death game of Russian Roulette with us, or that they know something that we don’t.
As far as saying kooky things, remember how Bush called the Minute Men “vigilantes”?
In conclusion, even though Buchanan and Paul are not perfect candidates, if you compare their strong views, issue by issue, to the Democrat’s and Republican’s views and past deeds, there is no doubt to who I would vote for.

The problem with conspiracy theories, whether related to September 11, the 1969 moon landing, or the cause du jour, is they are implausible.

To work and remain undetected, a conspiracy has to be simple and involve only a tiny group of people. Recall, if you will, that the burglary of the DNC offices in the Watergate Hotel involved not as many as a dozen people, many of them highly trained and experienced intelligence operatives. Yet they were caught, and rather quickly.

These huge conspiracies people have imagined would require millions of dollars, either from a single source that could be anonymized or a huge number of undetectably small sources. No one has followed “Deep Throat’s” advice to Woodward and Bernstein: follow the money.

They’d also require hundreds, if not thousands, of direct participants, many of them government employees. Look around you, and see whether you can name a single government operation that is conducted without waste, clamor and ineptitude. Here in my neighborhood, they can’t even collect the damn trash without a big fuss!

So, how small is the probability that a huge operation could be funded and implemented without at least one person leaking key evidence to the press, either out of moral outrage, chronic discontent, or in the hope of turning a profit?

As far as the Watergate break-in goes, you must remember that it was perpetrated by cronies of a Republican administration whom the “media” despised.
The media were all revved up to do some serious investigative reporting to get to the bottom of this. If cronies of a McGovern or a Carter or Clinton administration committed the same crime, it would have been regulated to a couple days coverage on page 36. In fact, I remember hearing about a similar break-in of a Republican office around that same period by Democrat operatives and there was hardly a peep. (I have to look into that again).
The media’s determination to do a thorough investigation for political reasons, combined with the Democrat’s aggressive zeal in using all their political powers in pursuing justice, and the Republican leadership’s willingness to eventually demand the resignation of their Party’s President (unlike the slimy Democrat leadership during the Clinton impeachment hearings)is what led to retribution, and not some failure in hiding a conspiracy, in my opinion.

Months before 9/11, there were reports of lower- echelon FBI field men telling their superiors about Arab pilot trainees not wanting to know how to land a plane, just how to fly it in mid-air. Apparently, they were ignored by the politically appointed heads of the FBI and CIA.

I’m not saying that for sure there was definitely a conspiracy involving 9/11 , but in light of various occurrences after the fact, I wouldn’t reflexively reject it. I like to keep an open mind, especially with the government we have today because I wouldn’t put anything past them. I consider them enemies of our Constitution and of the ideals of our forefathers.

I have known too many government employees to belive in a 9/11 conspiracy.

As someone wiser than I observes, “Never attribute to conspiracy something than can be readily explained by incompetence.”

Gross and widespread incompetence allowed the September 11th terrorists to carry out their mission. Clearly suspicious behavior (at the flight schools) was reported and ignored.

One cause of this is the unhealthy collusion between the FBI/CIA/NSA and the “defense electronics” industry. There is huge profit being made in developing and fielding electronic snooping equipment, from spy satellites to SIGINT apparatus. Management at the three-lettered agencies has allowed all this whiz-bang equipment to replace the “eyes on the ground” school of intelligence-gathering, and therein lies the problem.

“Enemies of our Constitution?” I agree 100%

Blogger1947 – good points, especially on conspiracies. And on coverup what about Sandy “TopSecret DocsintheSox” Berger?  Rarely do we hear about that coverup.  And where is the 180 form that Kerry promised he’d release about 2-3 years ago? Is he afriad that the redact will be visible and expose a not so honorable discharge? The dosiclists can cry all they want to about the SwiftBoat Vets, but Kerry by his own admission did consort with the enemy in France while he still held a commission in the U.S. Naval Reserve. That is an act of treason. The Dems and their socialist cohorts get free passes, no doubt about it. Another problem is calling the socialists “liberals”.  They are about as “liberal” as Joe Stalin, one of their idols, although some admit he “may have overdone things a bit”.  Any anyone who thinks that Obama is not a product of communist thinking needs to rad a bit of Marx, Lenin, and don’t forget his mentor “Frank”.

howiem – For that matter, am I the only person left in the USA who remembers Hillary Clinton vowing that she would “never” run for the Presidency?

Blogger1947 – What?  You missed the last part (microphone trouble) “of the local kennel club”

howiem, as a former dog obedience trainer, I would not want to inflict her on innocent canines…

Blogger1947 Neither would I….maybe she really said the Obama Fan Club

Right On, howiem,

In the end, the two-party system is really comprised of one single globalist party that gives the appearance that they oppose each other. They protect each other when serious scandals threaten their power.
Remember Bush implying that he’ll intercept any serious prosecution of Sandy Berger before his sentencing?

Blogger1947,

Do you think it’s due to incompetence that 7 years after 9/11, Bush still refuses to secure our borders. To me, this seems like he’s either suicidal, playing Russian roulette with the country’s security for the sake of cheap labor to pay off his corporate buddies, or that he knows 9/11 didn’t happen like he would like us to think it happened.
Again, I don’t know if there was a conspiracy involved with 9/11, but some of the events after the catastrophe (the borders, no high-ranking government officials losing their jobs for criminal incompetence, half-assed pursuit of Bin Laden and his top henchmen, and getting us involved in a Vietnam-style, low-level conflict/occupation with Iraq).
I think most fair-minded Americans realize that if Bush took off the politically correct handcuffs from our soldiers and let them do their job, this 2-bit country would have been pacified years ago and so many casualties would have been avoided. Long, purposely drawn-out conflicts has always made certain soulless individuals rich as well as dividing the nation so as to weaken it and help bring in the New World Order.
Bush, the father, used to mention his desire for a New World Order when he addressed Congress during his presidency.

pizcaj – I can’t argue with your observation on the bad joke referred to as a two-party system here.

As for conspiracies, I maintain that they are implausible on such a grand scale as what people have tried to envision about the WTC buildings. It is entirely possible that some smaller conspiracy led to the twenty hijackers being allowed into the country and trained to fly. But all the other stuff about the rate of collapse of the buildings, etcetera is a bit hard to swallow. There is that little matter of someone ordering building 7 to be “pulled,” which I find troubling. It’s entirely possible that some of these buildings were constructed with scuttle mechanisms of some sort, but I think if that were the case, the same systems would be found in the buildings that remain standing.

Iraq, it seems to me, was a matter of family pride. “W” using a convenient excuse to finish what his father failed to finish in the earlier Gulf War.

As for the southern border, I don’t think there are two dozen politicans who genuinely support securing the border. Some are idealogues who will make the inevitable comparisons to the Berlin Wall and the Great Wall of China. But I suspect most are simply in a position to benefit financially from the availability of Mexican labor—which is not only low-cost, but fairly reliable. Around these parts (Baltimore) when you see a stoop-labor job in progress, it’s the Mexicans who are sweating the work while the US ghetto element is standing around smoking cigarettes. I have neighbors who have come (legally) from Nigeria, West Africa, the Carribbean islands and Mexico. To a person, they have a stronger work ethic than US-born people of the same educational and economic level. And I don’t mean just black Americans. There are plenty of whites around here (some of them actually supremacists) who are lazy.

Then again, I am also convinced that the ultra-wealthy families (the Soros’s and the Bloombergs, for example) are actually pulling the strings of the elected politicians, except for those holding very minor local offices. That group appears to be in the pocket of the more localized criminal banker/developer element.

It’s not that I don’t believe in conspiracies, so much as that I think we are plagued by a countless number of micro-conspiracies, the effect of which operating together cannot be predicted.

Blogger1947,

As far as the Trade Towers, I, too, never bought into the ‘rate of collapse theory’. After all, up until the day the planes crashed into them, who could have known how a tall building would react to such a strike. I always assumed that the intense heat from the jet fuel and high winds would sufficiently weaken the steel beams to cause the concrete floors to collapse on top of one another like dominoes.
However, I feel that ‘grand scale’ conspiracies are entirely possible. For instance, in the JFK assassination, I find it hard to believe that after watching JFK’s body reaction (backward/left) during the fatal head wound in the Zapruder film and the government, along with the help of the senior leadership of the FBI, CIA, and “mainstream media” trying to convince us that the shot came from behind (book depository), that there was no cover up involved.
Add to that, the fact that Oswald was conveniently snuffed out by a shady strip club owner with ties to the mob with the unlikely motive of “wanting to spare Mrs. Kennedy the ordeal of her husband’s assassin testifying at the eventual trial.” And we’re supposed to swallow this hook, line, and sinker.
I partially agree with you on Bush’s motives for wanting to finish what his father started in the previous Gulf War, however, I don’t think it was the only reason for going in there. If it were just for that, then he should have been satisfied with Saddam’s capture, removal from power,  and ultimate execution, then getting our troops out.
I think it’s obvious that what he had in mind was a drawn-out, low-level conflict for nefarious reasons, just as was done in Vietnam.
As far as your points on cheap labor and the borders, I feel that if today’s greedy business owners weren’t so obsessed with the bottom line and were willing to pay livable wages to Americans to do these menial jobs, there would be no need for illegals. To me, part of being a good business man, besides a healthy, ambitious pursuit of profit, is having a respectful and well-meaning attitude towards your subordinates and not to treat them as if they were a notch above being slaves that are to be exploited. It’s not what this country is supposed to be about, as well as what business is not supposed to be about. I never bought into Bush’s arrogant, phony line that illegals do the menial work that Americans refuse to do.
If I were a successful business man who dreamed of owning 2 yachts, I would settle for 1 yacht if it meant that those working for me can earn a descent wage and maybe live part of the “American Dream”.
As far as the ghetto element, I like radio talk show host Michael Savage’s solution that we require long-time welfare recipients to do certain jobs such as cleaning streets, parks, etc., or else they get cut-off from anymore assistance.

I am stunned that Obama has set the parameters of what we are allowed or not allowed to discuss in this campaign.  We can’t talk about race, about his middle name, about his wife, about his religion, about his muslim background, etc, etc.  He is dictating the media and the discourse. So much for freedom of speech!!!
It is OK for the Obama campaign to bring up race because they use it for their advantage—victimhood and white guilt. Fact of the matter is that it is not because he is black that white america may not vote for him—but because of his socialist, liberal philosophy, total lack of experience, and untrustworthiness. Not because of his race. Let’s not forget Rev. WRight (his spiritual mentor for 20 years). Who is naive enough to believe that he never knew Rev. Wrights positions!! Only a fool can.

Regarding Obama’s lack of awareness of Rev. Wright’s political bent, here are brief passages from a 2004 interview:

“These days, he [Obama]says, he attends the 11 a.m. Sunday service at Trinity in the Brainerd neighborhood every week—or at least as many weeks as he is able. His pastor, Wright, has become a close confidant.”

and

“Friends and advisers, such as the Rev. Michael Pfleger, pastor of St. Sabina Roman Catholic Church in the Auburn-Gresham community on the South Side, who has known Obama for the better part of 20 years, help him keep that [moral] compass set, he says.”

Source: The Chicago Sun Times
“I have a deep faith” by Cathleen Falsani
Interview with Sen. Barack Obama
April 5, 2004
http://www.suntimes.com/news/falsani/726619,obamafalsani040504.article

By way of sharing,
Kay Day

P.S. Using IE pulls a blank Falsani page. Firefox will get you to the article, though.

Diana, I am with you 100% until you hit that “white america may not vote for him.”

“White America” is not a cultural, economic or even ethnic monolith. Do you honestly believe that (for example) Katie Couric is of the same “culture” as a fork lift operator in Beloit, Wisconsin? Or an elderly resident of a trailer park in South Carolina?

Blogger1947, Actually. Politically speaking I do think Couric, the fork lift operator and the elderly resident may agree on politics. I talk to a lot of people (and get so much email I have to get my daughter to help me keep up with it.) People on fixed incomes and many blue collar workers seem fixated on a single political party.

I spent some time a few weeks ago with a retired military fellow—not an officer, but a respectable mid-rank. He is absolutely devoted to the Democratic Party. I asked him if there was a particular issue he really felt the DNC had helped him on. “Nope. But they’ll bring our troops home,” he said.

And this: “The Democrats are for the common man.”(Direct quote).

I was astounded. I mentioned the marriage penalty that will return on his income taxes—he and his wife have a very comfortable retirement—he worked after retiring from military so has more than one cushion plus soc. sec.

He really didn’t even realize there was a marriage penalty. Nor did he realize there’s been a shift in Sen. Obama’s plans regarding Iraq.

Dems are better at the narrative—and in my opinion, they have more support in the press (a Harvard study and a study noted by The Committee for Concerned Journalists both confirm that).

Just thought I’d toss that one in—best, Kay

You’re so right, Kay B.Day.
It seems that too many people in this country either can’t be bothered with politics, or vote by tradition,(My parents were Democrats, their parents were democrats, and by God, I’m voting Democrat.)
It is due to this lack of maturity and indifference that we have had such inept, corrupt, anti-constitution politicians being elected and re-elected. (Can someone explain to me how anyone could pull the lever for Ted Kennedy all these years knowing his ultra-liberal, socialist policies, and of his crime concerning Chappaquiddick?
If this man lived to be 1,000 years old, he’d be re-elected for that whole period.
This type of immaturity and one-dimensional thinking on the part of the majority of Mass. voters is representative of the majority of Americans nation-wide.
A mature, thinking society would never have tolerated likes of a John McCain or Barack Obama as the two leading presidential candidates.

Google needs to take responsibility for censoring these blogs by publicly apologizing and pledge to never censor content again…force them to change or else we will blog on non-Google platforms: https://www.thepoint.com/campaigns/stop-google-censorship

Will Obama officially change T’Giving dinner to chittlins and greens if president?

Stephen – Most free forums on the Web are censored or redacted. That’s YOUR “cost” of using them. And that’s why I pay for blog hosting. The cash outlay is only three bucks a month, and outside the terms-of-service, which prohibit pornography, content is unrestricted. The server is in London, and the software is maintained from Glasgow. The owners are a small outfit with absolutely no ax to grind in US politics. My web hosting is done by a small (6 employees) company in New England, for the same reasons. The people there are politically liberal, but we respect each other’s differences because we know each other as people.

@Jim, that’s a nasty remark. I’m an old, bald white guy and I love greens. I get my share of chit’lins, but in the form of sausage and scrapple.

However, I cannot resist observing that if Obama is elected, there will be little for which anyone will be thankful, by Thanksgiving of 2009. I don’t think he will be satisfied short of reducing everyone to the same state of poverty, as was the case in Soviet Russia. You had the “apparatchiki,” who lived quite comfortably, and everyone else was reduced to standing in line for food and other commodities.

Whenever I post a pro McCain blog on CNN’s ‘Ask Jack Cafferty’ blog, not only do they moderate my blog and reject publishing it … I immediately get 300 to 600 pieces of spam in my mail box.

Lee, as I have said before, the free blog sites “cost” you in that way. I’m curious what the hundreds of spam messages are, though. Are they more or less identical, as though you are being mail-bombed? Surely they don’t each originate from a separate source do they? You can track IP addresses on them if you’re curious enough to do the work.

At the risk of violating some terms-of-service condition, I will say that the blog site I mentioned in #36 is blog-city.com.  You can put up a free site, although some handy features are not enabled unless you pay. And the annual cost is around $36.

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h106/imaginaryskate/osamabiden.jpg

The left in America are the intolerant hypocrites.  My blog comments are often times removed/censored while   -filled intolerant comments on the left are accepted.  Hope for the best (that McCain/Palin win), but prepare for the worst (that OBummer/Biden win). Get out your old Y2K books and start preparing for a coming nightmare in America. Start reading the Bible, esp Psalms and the NT.  Look forward to Jesus’ coming kingdom, not Obama’s nightmare black liberation NWO kingdom with Pelosi and Reid and new liberal judges. Encourage and pray for a future impe^chment or c@up or something.  Get ready to move to a place of refuge, maybe get off the grid, start up hunting moose or deer or caribou for extra food (Sarah Palin is heads up on most of us), start fishing again, plant a garden away from liberal bigots and black inner city thugs who Obama will give money to in his new socialism (one who recently carved the letter ‘B’ for Barack in a white woman’s face who supports McCain/Palin), etc.

Uh oh Anti-Obama supporters. Obama IS president now. So quit your whining.

Luna – <<“Uh oh Anti-Obama supporters. Obama IS president now. So quit your whining”>>

So, does your above statement mean that you, Luna, been whining for the past 8 years because of the 2000 election controversy?
If so, then don’t deny us “Anti-Obama supporters” the same right to whine, especially since Barry is apparently unconstitutionally unqualified to be president(or Senator, for that matter) since he’s shown no proof of his citizenship, and that the state of Hawaii has kept his long-form birth certificate locked up and with Barry’s team of lawyers making sure it stays locked up.
He has also kept sealed his Occidental College and Columbia records. Fear that he received financial aid as a foreign student might be revealed? Or maybe, grade-wise, that he was academically as stupid as G.W. Bush and Algore were and with a little ‘affirmative action’ mixed into the gruel in regards to grades received and the fact that he got into these universities in the first place?
What is there to hide?

The only thing we can do now is hope he gets killed. Yes you read right, he is THE worst thing to ever happen to the US. His is a fucken communist who wants us all to bow to him and I for one refuse! He wants control over every aspect of your life. Your bank, your car, your health, what news you should watch, how you vote, how your vote gets counted and who gets to count it (acorn). #### him! Damn I hope he gets it right between the eyes. Better yet I hope he gets court marshaled and shot for treason against his country. He lied his ass off, and does not respect the Constitution at all. He should die by the Constitution!

google has always been pro obama and tries to keep anti-obama comments off the net. Nothing new there.

what these idiotic supporters such as google , walmart and the little sheepie doesn”t realize that if barry gets his energy thing passed it will collaspse this country. They will be in the same old proverial boat as the rest of us.  What does it take for them to open thier eyes and admit they are wrong about this kenyan.

Whether we are able to impeach Obama, or not … Barack and Michele should be convicted of treason. Their crimes against America and the American people must be punished with more than just a slap on the hand.

[...] Google Censoring Right-Leaning Websites? But wait there's more………………….. Google Blocks Anti-Obama Blogs [...]

[...] Campaign Bought the Google Search for Goldman Sachs SEC!, page 1 Google Blocks Anti-Obama Blogs Google Blocks Anti-Obama Blogs Quote: It may be hard to see, so you can find an enlarged version here, but the number one [...]