GE and MSNBC are worthless companies.  The stockholder should sue them for fraud because they don’t run the compnies to make money for their stockholders anymore.  They run it to push their leftist, socialist agenda.  They hire unqualified people as supposed journalists, like the idiotic Olbermann and try to disguise what they do as reporting.  Hey guys, reporting is giving the facts in an unbiased manner, not telling lies or creating stories.  My TV doesn’t even have NBC or MSNBC as channels of choice because I don’t want their garbage in my house.

Here is proof positive that liberals can dish it out but they can’t take it. Free speech is great with them as long as its THEIR free speech.

Forbes magazine just listed Immelt as the worst CEO in America, GE stock has lost 75% of its value, and NBC/MSNBC has become a tool of the DNC, blatantly campaigning for Barack Obama in the ‘08 election, and insulted and denigrated the Tea Party attendees. The market shall dictate, as most have decided to boycott NBC & MSNBC, while FOXNEWS dominates the ratings war, especially The O’Reilly Factor, 100 months and counting at #1 !! Fair and Balanced.

The stock holders should vote all of them out.  This is final proof on what their agenda is.  Fredom of speech, I don’t think so.  No wonder they want a socialist government.  I wonder if the CEO’s get that same thrill up their leg that Chris Matthews gets up his leg when Obama speaks.

Let us also not forget Time Warner who has people working for both them and NewsCorp. They include Larry McReynolds, Dick Stockton, Frank Caliendo, Bernard Goldberg, Jane Hall, Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, Kyle Petty, Adam Lashinsky, Nina Waston, Ralph Sheheen, Pam Oliver, Chip Caray, and Bill Webber.

These people are just as evil as anyone working on NBC News and MSNBC.

17 Million petition signers have agreed to boycott all advertises on NBC, MSNBC, and since Obama and Immelt has told CNBC to stop announcing market news which is negative. They have added [CNBC] to the list.

As far as MBC and MSNBC, including the Mainstream Media have no morals, nor intentions on being fair-minded, so what is the use of even having them around at all. Jeffery Immelt, CEO of GE who owns NBC, MSNBC, and CNBC is working for Obama plus looking for a bail out, when GE has clearly broken the law by using their U.S./U.K. plants to send technology, equipment, parts, and service to Iran does not deserve a bailout, the should be shut down or abide by the rules. But that will not happen when you have the President as a friend. That kills any chance of Imelt and Zucker from being investigated.

It Reminds me of Diogenes who the man who walked the streets of Athens, Greece, during the day time, with a lighted lantern at night—looking for an honest man. He would not find one in the MSM or the Liberal Progressives in both Houses.

I don’t know about all of these people, but Bernard Goldberg is one of the few who have given us the straight scoop on the liberal scumbags in the so-called “mainstream media”.

Have you ever heard the term “no man can serve two masters”? Goldberg works for Bryant Gumbel’s show on HBO which is owned by Time Warner, the same HBO that has the hate monger Bill Maher on it.

I can only imagine that President Obama will give the order to Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes to have CNN’s Dr. Gupta pump Goldberg, et. al. full of scopolamine and sodium pentathal to send Goldberg, et. al. and their friends “up the river”.

Who cares about all this crap?

Whatever GE succeeds or fails at is a stockholders’ and consumers’ issue.  And, today, all media outlets serve what they each perceive to be their own particular market – and, if they make a mistake in selecting a market or in determining how best to serve it – then they make changes to better suit the market, they switch to another market, or they go out of business.

AND – MSNBC is certainly the cable newstalk channel of leftist partisans – and is definitely no worse in terms of that fact than Fox News, which is the obvious cable newstalk channel of rightist partisans.  So – pick your poison!  Matthews, Olbermann, Maddow – or – O’Reilly, Hannity, Beck.  Big deal.  Who cares.  NONE of them are “objective” or “fair and balanced”.

For the most part, human nature is such that one follows where one’s preconceptions, predilections, prejudices, biases and ethnocentricities lead.

To: Wesley In Dallas:

And, of course, while you say it’s impossible to “find an honest man” at NBC, MSNBC or among (so-called)“liberals or progressives in both houses” – - – do you also insist that the “honest man” CAN ONLY BE FOUND at Fox News, on talk radio, or only among the self-described ‘conservatives’ in the House and Senate?  (Political partisan blarney!)

It’s a recurring joke to any fair-minded and relatively objective person how often the most UN-objective of people are always the ones complaining about the “lack of objectivity” in the media (and EVERYWHERE else!).

Most people dance to their favorite music.

TK said:

- – - do you also insist that the “honest man” CAN ONLY BE FOUND at Fox News, on talk radio, or only among the self-described ‘conservatives’ in the House and Senate?  (Political partisan blarney!)
———————-
Once again you put words in my mouth, how many times do I have to tell you, I do not listen to TALK RADIO, and if you want to get into partisanship, there hasn’t been any for quite awhile.

I knew what Cheney was doing when he offered to declassify the monthly soft interrogation documents, 1) He proved what was accomplished, and 2) He proved who all were attending these briefings, and surprise…the one who has swore she NEVER ever knew anything about it, when in fact Nancy Pelosi attended every monthly meeting since 2002, and was aware water boarding was being used. There were as many Democrats as Republicans, of course she claimed to not have known water boarding was actually used, so Cheney want the audio of each meeting released, Pelosi and other Dems are fighting releasing those. Hmmm, cannot imagine why???

Just as Jack Nicholson told Tom Cruise in the film, A Few Good Men…“You want the truth, you can’t handle the truth”. And neither can you liberal progressives.

Re: Post 10;

Wes, your comments can get difficult to follow sometimes, but you know that, right?

And, you know, I R-E-A-L-L-Y do not care much for Nancy Pelosi – nor am I happy that she has the job that she has!  I believe she is a personal impediment to Barack Obama – and I believe she, Harry Reid, Howard Dean, et al, have a negative effect on the greater Democratic Party and its policies and programs.

And – if she is lying about knowing about waterboarding – so what?  Regardless of her position – using waterboarding and other intensive interrogation techniques is still an issue of concern to many Americans – and will still require a policy decision relevant to its future use by the U.S. military or other authorities.

Frankly, I hope it becomes obvious that Pelosi lied or committed some other related infraction – an infraction sufficiently worthy of the Democrats in the House immediately replacing her!

TK said in post #11

“And – if she is lying about knowing about waterboarding – so what?”

So what? She is basing here cause for investigating Bush on torture (specifically water boarding), when she knew all along what they were doing the whole time.

And what is it exactly confusing to you in my comment in Post # 10? Seems to me you are the only one with following posts. By the by, I cannot stand Hannity either, I watch the real news, such as America’s Newsroom, Happening Now, Special Report (formally with Brit Hume), and if you watch Bill O’Reilly, he takes up for Obama constantly, but seeks the truth.

Re: Post 12;

If the Bush administration’s policies regarding interrogation techniques are shown to be questionable enough to warrant a further investigation – - it is NOT because Nancy Pelosi “knew about them” or not, nor whether she lied about knowing about them or not.  The policies themselves are at issue – and whether or not the Bush administration potentially circumvented domestic and internationla laws in approving the policies and/or techniques.

First and foremost, if a ‘criminal’ investigation IS initiated, it is the sole responsibility of the Department of Justice to initiate it – and that decision WOULD NOT involve what Nancy Pelosi knew or didn’t know.

If the House of Representatives chooses to initiate a congressional inquiry, it would decide to do so following very-well-stipulated procedures – and it could NOT be initiated solely at the discretion of Nancy Pelosi.  But, again, the issue involves possible Bush administration CONDUCT that potentially VIOLATES domestic and international law or conventions – and NOT whether Nancy Pelosi “knew about it” – or not.

So, what I said remains operative: “… if she (Nancy Pelosi) is lying about knowing about waterboarding – so what? …”

IF Pelosi did lie about it – and IF others in the Democratic leadership find that unacceptable – they can act to replace her as Speaker of the House.  But any magilla involving Pelosi has NOTHING to do with any potential investigation of Bush administration-approved interrogation techniques and policies.

Re: your Post10?  I have no clue whatsoever what your point was or how what you stated related to the making of that point.