
Democrat contributors on Fox News resist calls to quit the cable news giant from party loyalists.
From the Politico
Democratic pundit Bob Beckel has been under contract with Fox News for six years. And in the midst of the White House war against the cable network, some of his liberal friends think that’s six years too many.
They invited him to lunch the other day for an intervention: Why is Beckel — a true-blue Democrat who worked for Robert F. Kennedy and ran Walter Mondale’s 1984 presidential campaign — giving comfort to the enemy?
Beckel’s response: “I talk to more persuadable voters in a month than anybody on MSNBC and CNN talks to in a year.”
In the eyes of some of their party brethren, Beckel and other Democratic strategists and pundits who appear regularly on Fox News are traitors to the cause. Or at least gluttons for punishment.
And some of them feel that way, too.
“It sucks,” says Democratic direct-mail consultant Liz Chadderdon, a regular on the network. “It is very, very tough to be a Democrat on Fox.”
During an October 2007 hit on “The Factor,” Chadderdon referred to the detainees at Guantanamo Bay as “victims.” It was a verbal faux pas, and she knew it. But no sooner did she get off the air than she received a death threat — the first of a handful she says she’s received after appearing on Bill O’Reilly’s Fox show.
More recently, Chadderdon has been invited to talk business with Fox’s Neil Cavuto — on the main network and on the two-year-old Fox Business Network — even though she readily admits that she has no background in economics.
“Speaking about those issues is not my forte,” said Chadderdon. “And I’m getting the tar kicked out of me.”
So why does she keep doing it? For pretty much the same reason Willie Sutton robbed banks. Fox is where the viewers are — No. 1 in the prime-time news ratings and drawing more than twice as many viewers on weeknights as either MSNBC or CNN.
“You know how I know nobody watches CNBC?” said Chadderdon. “I compared the pope to my 11th-grade algebra teacher, and nobody sent me a letter.”
Lanny Davis, former White House counsel for Bill Clinton, says some of his fellow Democrats privately encourage him to keep appearing on Fox — even as they boycott the network themselves.
“I get very positive but whispered reinforcement,” he said.
Davis made news during last year’s Democratic presidential primaries when he said that Fox was the fairest of the cable networks in its treatment of Hillary Clinton.
And now, he insists, the claims of bias directed at Fox are overstated, at least insofar as they come from devotees of one of its competitors.
“Is there a difference between Fox and MSNBC?” he asked. “You count the number of guests on Rachel [Maddow] and Keith [Olbermann] who are conservative Republicans. If you get to double digits, I’ll buy you dinner for each one.”
Susan Estrich is perhaps the most identifiable Democratic pundit on the network. She’s been on the payroll for more than a decade, having first gotten to know Fox News President Roger Ailes when they were working on opposite sides of the 1988 presidential campaign.
The Fox audience does dwarf the competition but it doesn't hurt that the Democrats are being well paid for providing some balance and in some cases cannon fodder for Fox shows.
Post #2435

I think Beckel is right. He talks to more persuadable people on Fox than he could ever talk to on most of the other outlets. The perception that Fox viewers are far right is off. But when you look at this from the far left it might appear that way. Many people simply want the news without the adulatory slant. Adulatory news isn’t news at all, but is closer to propaganda. I am tired of all of them to be honest. I think it is a case of crisis overload. Everything now is one crisis after the next crisis. Enough already.

I think I would rather see only die-hard conservative hosts and guests on Fox than seeing token Democrats or Liberals in a travesty of fairness and balance. Considering that the views of these Liberal guests are always distorted or sometimes overpowered by Conservative Fox hosts that systematically interrupt them, I think that this “fair and balance” approach is bogus. Just like when Nixon said “I’m not a crook!”... if you are not, why do you feel the need to defend yourself? Same for Fox News: the fact that they need to say they are balanced make it suspicious to me and is a sort of preemptive rebuttal against possible criticism. I would rather have an honest perspective (sometimes the reality is closer to the Liberal or the Conservative view) rather than the pretense of artificial fairness.
November 2 at 10:34 am | #1 | Link
Terrific article, Don and Aim are the most reliable observers of the media in the country. I love to watch their symposiums on CSPAN!