Ayers Charges Dog Obama
By Don | October 11, 2008
Barack Obama lashed out at John McCain in anew ad calling the Bill Ayers charges "smears".
From the Politico.
|
|
Sen. Barack Obama says in a new ad that he launched his first campaign at the Ramada Inn in Chicago, not the living room of former terrorist William Ayers, as Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) says.
The new ad takes a faintly mocking and even bemused tone.
McCain told ABC’s Charles Gibson this week: “He launched his political career in his living room, in Mr. Ayers' living room.”
The 30-second Obama ad, called “Lose,” airing in key states, says: “John McCain admits if the election is about the economy, he’s going to lose. Now as Americans lose their jobs and saving, McCain’s resorting to smears and false attacks. Barack Obama launched his first campaign here, not in anyone’s living room. And Bill Daley? He was confirmed as commerce secretary and praised for his great work … by none other than John McCain. It’s clear … with no plan to fix our economy, smears are all McCain has left.”
McCain ahould have brought this up sooner as it looks like desperation to do so know and with a lack of conviction to boot.
9 Comments | Post a Comment
Crickets. Tumbleweed. The sound of the AIM website growing more “objective.” Etc.
Translation for the irony-free: “Not in a million years.”
*
Now, the AIM-conditioned response: “A Liddy relationship is the creation of the liberal media.” “The press is in the tank for Obama.”
David “Hussein” Goodis: “And the McCain campaign? In the sensory-deprivation tank.”
So it goes.
David “Hussein” Goodis? You must be a relation to some one else - Barack “Hussein” Osama? lol
Somebody on here called me an “Obamaton,” so I thought I’d have some fun. And what does your own “H” stand for? What are you hiding, Jack? lol
hahhaahahahaha - its not “Hussein”! How about handsome? Yeah, when I was 20 and 30, maybe, but not so now!
The support for the most despicable presidential candidate in history is what we should be talking about rather than arguing about whether Obama or McCain have associated with crooks.
The “changes” Obama plans to implement are much worse (if that is possible) than his association with, mentoring by, working with, and support of terrorists, racists, anti-Americans of all stripes, and crooks.
Will this dog McCain? Or will it be spun? Hot off the presses:
“McCain’s campaign is now intimately tied to Saddam Hussein’s murderous regime in Iraq with William Timmons overseeing his transition planning and team. Under McCain’s own rubric then, he himself is palling around with a pal of a globally malevolent terrorist who, over decades, killed tens of thousands. Let’s break it down further: McCain continues to assert that 9/11 and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq are fundamentally linked. Under his own standard, McCain has on his staff, in one of the most important jobs on the campaign, a man, Timmons, who aided, abetted and promoted a regime, which, in McCain’s mind, had a hand in the murder of thousands of Americans on September 11. Using McCainian logic, he has hired an accomplice to 9/11. Now if that doesn’t call his judgment into question, I don’t know what will.
“McCain has once again put country last during a critical moment in campaign decision making. The McCain/Timmons situation is the Obama/Ayers connection on 100% pure anabolic steroids delivered straight to the vein. And hopefully, the media will jump on this, not because it is some political ploy by a desperate campaign as is the case with McCain’s Ayers argument, but because this is a completely shady, improper and duplicitous breach of trust towards the American people, reflective of a leader who simply has no good leadership qualities left.”
Or so says Democracy Arsenal.
much closer ties exist between John McCain and G. Gordon Liddy than between Obama and Ayers.
Liddy, you may remember, advised his fairly substantial radio audience to shoot federal agents if they come to your house. He included the helpful hint that, since the feds would likely wear vests of the bulletproof variety, one should shoot them in the face. I’ll repeat that: G. Gordon Liddy suggested shooting US federal agents in the face.
McCain was on Liddy’s show THIS YEAR, referring to him as an OLD FRIEND.
Yes, lauren daughter, I remember that useful information from Liddy. And when you liberals come to haul me away to your re-education gulags because I am against your socialistic/communistic take over of our once Constitutional Republic - it is what I will do, shoot the federal agents, aka criminals, in the face.
I may lose like when they committed felonies against the people at Ruby Ridge and Waco, and against the people of that LDS Church sect, but if I can take a couple of these American traitors with me, it will be that few who will then no longer be available to commit further felony crimes. And I will do it because when federal agents commit felony crimes, they are NEVER held accountable in the corrupt court system that is a rubber stamp for federal felons. Had they executed the FBI agents that feloniously slaughtered Randy Weaver’s wife and son, I would not, but since the courts believe that agents of government have a right to slaughter their fellow citizens in violation of our laws, it must be my right to slaughter them when they come in my door.
Somewhere along the line, government and law enforcement in this country forgot that they are subject to the same laws as everyone else - they actually think they are above the law. In actuality, they should be held accountable at even a higher standard as they are employed by us to UPHOLD the law, and they clearly know (no ambiguities) when they are breaking the law. But corrupt judges, aka American Constitutional traitors, allow them to walk scot free.
October 12 at 4:27 pm | #1 | Link
So, any chance AIM will reveal the connections between John McCain and convicted felon and unrepentant domestic terrorist G. Gordon Liddy?