Get our free daily email!
-

Why Doesn’t Obama Ban Iranian Press TV? by Kenneth R. Timmerman
The Case of CH2M HILL: $2 Billion in Crony Stimulation by Rusty Weiss
The Truth about George Soros by AIM Staff
Lifting the Veil on WikiLeaks by AIM Staff
The Truth about Al-Jazeera English by Cliff Kincaid
Reaganomics and Obamanomics in the Media and in Reality by Malcolm A. Kline, Don Irvine and Spencer Irvine
How State Budget Battles Could Mean More Criminals Back on the Streets by Michael Tremoglie
Radical Muslims, Environmentalists and the Green Jihad by Mark Musser
Russian-Backed Propaganda Networks Claim Obama is a CIA Agent by Cliff Kincaid
Media Conceal True Nature of Flash Mob Racial Violence by John T. Bennett
NBC’s Mitchell Should Resign Over Telling Gaddafi’s Lies (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) by Cliff Kincaid
CASA de Maryland: The Illegals’ ACORN by James Simpson
Follow AIM on Facebook
Special Report
-
Recent Articles and Posts
- Dershowitz Doubles Down on Trayvon Martin Case
- Romney: From ‘Bullying’ to ‘Raping’ [Video]
- Dem. Congressman on MSNBC: Mitt Romney, Bain “Raping” Companies
- Can We Avoid “Taxmageddon” in 2013?
- New York Times Public Editor to Depart in September
- Washington Post Ombudsman Admits Paper Falls Short on Catholic Coverage
The Newswire
Take AIM Podcast







I just discovered this website, and within 10 minutes of scanning through the articles and ramblings illogical statements, I can tell that it is a completely useless and thoroughly biased website.
You, Don, exhibit a certain level ignorance when it comes to the basic functions of the media, which explains why you are attempting to write blogs that barely qualify as a single paragraph. The corporate controlled media has a primary objective of increasing profit. This is done by any means necessary, including doing bad journalism and attempting to dig up “dirt” on anyone possible, inflating stories as often and extravagantly as possible, and diverting attention away from the truly important issues at hand. The corporate media thrives off of scandals, as sex is a particular hot spot for viewership. The media promote themselves as caring about the truth and important issues, like, release of semi-classified information about illegal foreign wars. Then, when they have someone agree to do an interview, they start deliberately changing the topic to something completely unrelated, unsubstantiated, and obviously a pathetic attempt to defile someone’s reputation and international standing. It is so painfully obvious that the media would rather run with a sex scandal story than something ACTUALLY important to Americans, that I feel slightly sad having to even explain this fact to you.
By the way, I love the childish pseudo-intellectual insult directed at Julian Assange that you placed at the end of your message. Classy. Name calling doesn’t exactly prove or disprove your already factually and rationality-lacking argument.
No doubt this message will fail to surface on this website.