The New York Times profiles Judge Jack Weinstein who thinks child porn laws are too harsh.

From the New York Times

In his 43-year career as a federal judge, Jack B. Weinstein has come to be identified by his efforts to combat what he calls “the unnecessary cruelty of the law.” His most recent crusade is particularly striking because of the beneficiary: a man who has amassed a vast collection of child pornography.

Judge Weinstein, who sits in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, has twice thrown out convictions that would have ensured that the man spend at least five years behind bars. He has pledged to break protocol and inform the next jury about the mandatory prison sentence that the charges carry. And he recently declared that the man, who is awaiting a new trial, did not need an electronic ankle bracelet because he posed “no risk to society.”

No risk to society?  He collected more than 5,000 images of child porn. Does the judge think that the children in the pictures were not harmed in any way?

Maybe I’m being overly sensitive here but for the Times to give this judge a soapbox so that he can rail against what he perceives are the injustices of child porn sentencing guidelines is far from responsible journalism.

Thanks for giving child pornographers hope that may not have to pay the price for their crimes.

Share This

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

About the author

1 Comment for Are Child Porn Laws Too Tough?