“With the polls changing daily and widely diverging at this point it’s hard to tell which way the election will go.”

for you, maybe. Unless voter suppression on the part of the Repubs is MUCH greater than anticipated, the Dems win big.

Really Dave?  Dems win big and you’re basing this prediction on the biased polls?  Gore was up by 11 in the polls going into the election in 2000 and he lost.  The polls are simply a political manipulation ploy to convince undecided voters to vote for their candidate. 

And let’s talk about voter fraud committed by ACORN over and over again in every swing state.  If Obama cannot buy the election, he’ll try to steal it.

Charles, no offense, I mean this in the nicest way: you couldn’t be more frightening.

I’m flatly stating that unless the Republicans have this thing rigged (and who knows? Maybe Bush signed a law outlawing rigged elections BUT THEN SIGNED A SIGNING STATEMENT EXEMPTING HIS BUDDIES. He’s done a lot of that, you know. He snuck it it while you were busy looking for liberals to bash.)the Dems win big. Your read of the polls is paranoia writ large.

“And let’s talk about voter fraud committed by ACORN over and over again in every swing state.  If Obama cannot buy the election, he’ll try to steal it.”

Define “voter fraud”. If you mean inventing names of voters, that’s not even CLOSE to voter fraud. It’s not like the made up people can now vote. THEY’RE NOT REAL PEOPLE, CHARLIE! So exactly how could a bunch of fake names on pieces of paper be part of an attempt to “steal the election”?

It’s not like seeing the brother of a Republican candidate, in his role as the governor of a largely populated state, work with his attorney general to scrub tens of thousands of eligible voters, predominantly LIKELY DEMOCRATIC VOTERS, from the rolls, and having that state then decide its candidate by less than 200 votes.

Now THAT’S stealing an election! (with a huge assist from an activist court!)

Dave, you’re showing your ignorance now.  Maybe you didn’t hear about the hundreds of college students flooding into Ohio to register and vote early under fake names with fake addresses.  That my friend, is called voter fraud!

charles-

“Maybe you didn’t hear about the hundreds of college students flooding into Ohio to register and vote early under fake names with fake addresses.  That my friend, is called voter fraud!”

Yes it is. first of all, a dozen isn’t “hundreds”. second of all, your original hysterical comment was that Obama would “try to steal” the election.

Obama has exactly WHAT to do with these kids? Hmmm?

Oh please, you can’t possibly be that stupid.  Well, you’re a liberal, so obviously you can be.  Like Bush really had anything to do with the mess in Florida in 2000 either.  If Bush is guilty, then Obama is guilty.  Goes both ways ass clown.

Charles-

I point out that Obama has NOTHING to do with these kids in Ohio and you say “…you can’t possibly be that stupid.” Some rejoinder!

then in response to my synopsis of the Florida 2000 vote you say “If Bush is guilty, Obama is guilty.”

So you have no argument at all, and your powers of cognition are fatally flawed. Otherwise you’re almost worth talking to.

Dave, don’t stress yourself out. While some AIM posters are intelligent people with whom you can carry on a spirited, insightful exchange, these pages seems to attract an overlarge share of readers who appear to be unacquainted with the basics of reasoned argument. You’ll just be called a “lib” and that will discredit whatever you have to say. (Colin Powell comes off as a “lib” here, as does Michael Smerconish (that nasty liberal wife of his), Kathleen Parker, etc. Next Bush will be a lib, and Karl Rove, and we can’t forget Saddam. In the neocon mythologies being prepared for our new century, the US will have ousted Saddam after revealing his relation to ACORN. Oh, and Ayers and Ahmadinejad, with whom Saddam had occasionally been “palling around.”)

I will probably come off as one of the elite saying that, but, well, hold on, my latte’s done and I have to go now.