ABC News has fired back at the Washington Post’s Tom Shales for questioning whether or not This Week host Christiane Amanpour sympathizes with the Taliban.

From Salon

ABC is hitting back at Washington Post TV critic Tom Shales for pushing “an utterly fabricated controversy” about “This Week” host Christiane Amanpour supposedly calling on viewers to honor slain Taliban fighters.

To review the background here: Amanpour, formerly chief international correspondent at CNN, had her debut on Sunday as the new host of This Week, ABC’s sunday politics show. When her selection was announced in March, Shales wrote a column attacking Amanpour for supposed anti-Israel bias (on the basis of a random Facebook group), pointedly noting her childhood in Iran.

So it wasn’t surprising when Shales wrote a new column Monday panning the debut of Amanpour, the “globe-trotting Fancy-Pants.” But critics have questioned what Shales’ was talking about with the following passage from his column accusing Amanpour of sympathy for the Taliban:

Perhaps in keeping with the newly globalized program, the commendable “In Memoriam” segment ended with a tribute not to American men and women who died in combat during the preceding week but rather, said Amanpour in her narration, in remembrance of “all of those who died in war” in that period. Did she mean to suggest that our mourning extend to members of the Taliban?

Jeffrey Schneider, senior vice president at ABC, told Salon that Shales’ criticism here is “utterly fabricated.”

“Christiane took the language from a prayer that she says in her Catholic church every weekend. It’s a bidding prayer,” Schneider said.

He accused Shales of “trying to create some kind of controversy out of something that is utterly well intentioned — which is to honor both U.S. soldiers that have died in battle as well as civilians and ordinary people who die in war all the time. Seems like a fairly non-controversial thing to do.” The segment, which you can watch below, features the names of slain U.S. servicemembers on the screen as Amanpour speaks.

Shales did not respond to a request for comment about his critiques.

Asked about the gendered language Shales used in his column — referring to “Grand Duchess Amanpour” and calling the show “shrill” — Schneider said: “There’s been a lot written and said about what Tom said about Christiane. I don’t think I need to add my voice to that. We scratch our heads at the way in which he has said some of these things. “

It’s worth noting that Shales also once criticized Amanpour for her hairstyle.

While I’m no fan of Amanpour and thought ABC made a mistake with her selection as the host, Shales’ statement is a stretch to say the least.  Shales may have been off base with his comment but he was on target with his criticism of Amanpour’s first show where she was clearly like a fish out of water as she tried to adapt her international background to a domestic issues based show.

One week doesn’t a pattern make, but her third place showing was probably not what the ABC brass was hoping for after spending months hyping her arrival.

We’ll just have to wait and see if ABC wound up making the right decision in the end.

Share This

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

About the author

4 Comments for ABC Fires Back at WaPo’s Shales Over Amanpour Column