AIM Report: The Plan to Silence Conservatives - February A
AIM Report | February 8, 2007
Suggesting the real agenda behind “media reform,” Jackson said that the key to Democrats winning “is more access to the media.”
Note: AIM editor Cliff Kincaid covered a left-wing National Conference for Media Reform in Memphis, Tennessee, from January 12-14. His report on the event, "The Plan to Silence Conservatives," was posted on the AIM website and has ignited a national controversy, as a liberal Democrat scheme to use the power of the federal government to silence conservatives in the media has now been exposed. AIM is being called upon to lead national efforts to preserve freedom of speech in the U.S. and resist this authoritarian campaign to muzzle conservative media voices. What follows are major excerpts of Kincaid's original report:
Media reform sounds like a good cause. But the gathering here of more than 2,000 activists turned out to be an effort to push the Democratic Party further to the left and get more "progressive" voices in the media, while proposing to use the power of the federal government to silence conservatives.
In short, triumphant liberals now want to consolidate and expand their power.
Several speakers, including Senator Bernie Sanders and Rep. Maurice Hinchey, declared that they think Congress should use a new federal "fairness doctrine" to target conservative speech on television and radio.
But while conservatives are not ashamed to be conservatives, because of the popularity of their ideas about freedom, a strong military, economic growth and traditional values, the liberals at this conference wanted desperately to avoid the use of the term "liberal," apparently because of its association with failed domestic, social and foreign policies. They described themselves and their causes as "progressive."
If this conference has an impact, and the participants were called upon to put pressure on the media and Congress, we should expect increasing references to the term "progressive" in coverage of controversial liberal initiatives, including the proposed agenda for "media reform." The only question is when congressional liberals will get enough nerve to aggressively push this authoritarian attempt to muzzle their political opponents.
The Soros Connection
Sponsored by Free Press, a Massachusetts-based organization that is generously subsidized by pro-Democratic Party billionaire George Soros, the "National Conference on Media Reform" featured Bill Moyers and Jesse Jackson, and Hollywood celebrities such as Danny Glover, Geena Davis and Jane Fonda.
Soros, portrayed by the major media and "progressives" funded by him as a humanitarian and philanthropist, has made billions of dollars through international financial manipulations conducted through secretive off-shore hedge funds. He was convicted of insider trading in France, one of many countries to have borne the brunt of his global financial schemes.
He spent over $26 million in the 2004 presidential campaign trying to defeat Bush and also contributed to groups that have brought Democrats to power in Congress.
His "media reform" agenda is being pursued primarily through Free Press, which has received at least $400,000 over the last several years from the Soros-funded Open Society Institute. But Soros has also poured money into groups like the Center for Investigative Reporting, the Fund for Investigative Journalism, and Investigative Reporters & Editors.
One obvious purpose of such grants is to steer the media away from investigating Soros himself. However, during one media appearance, on the CBS 60 Minutes program, Soros acknowledged that as a 14-year-old Jewish boy in Hungary, his identity was protected and that he actually assisted in confiscating property from Jews as they were being shipped off to death camps. As an adult, he shuns pro-Israel causes and believes in accommodating the Iranian regime.
Free Press co-founder, John Nichols, has edited such books as Against the Beast, a critique of the "American Empire," and shares Soros's opposition to a U.S. foreign policy that targets emerging threats in the Arab/Muslim world.
In addition to the creation of what he calls a "New World Order" under U.N. auspices, Soros's causes include abortion, drug legalization, and special rights for immigrants, homosexuals, felons, and prostitutes. An atheist, Soros is promoting the complete breakdown of traditional values and morality in America.
In the official conference program, however, there was no mention of the Soros role in funding Free Press. However, thanks were extended to the Nathan Cummings Foundation, the Overbrook Foundation, Quixote Foundation, Glaser Progress Foundation, and the Haas Trusts.
"We are grateful also for the generosity and support of many other public charities, private foundations and individual donors," the conference program said, carefully concealing their identities.
Publications and organizations given credit for promoting the event included The American Prospect magazine, The Washington Monthly, The Nation, and MoveOn.org.
Reds Not Under Beds
The Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP), which opposes the Chinese communist government as too capitalist, was one of the official exhibitors. Also on hand, displaying banners calling for the impeachment of President Bush, was the so-called 9/11 truth movement, which holds that Muslims were blamed for the 2001 terrorist attacks on New York City and the Pentagon when U.S. officials actually carried them out.
Other exhibitors included the Newspaper Guild, Consumers Union, Mother Jones magazine, Pacifica Radio, and Amy Goodman, host of "Democracy Now."
While the Democratic Party and its political leaders were embraced by most of the participants and usually met with standing ovations, the official conference bookstore didn't offer any books by or about Hillary Clinton. I was told by the bookstore owner that she was perceived as too conservative by this crowd and that those books wouldn't sell.
On the other hand, books by Senator Barack Obama and Al Gore were prominently featured. Books by Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Mikhail Gorbachev, former White House reporter Helen Thomas, and Webster Tarpley, a former associate of Lyndon LaRouche, were also available. Tarpley, an "expert" on how 9/11 was a U.S. plot, was a featured guest for two hours on Air America, the liberal radio network now in bankruptcy because of bad management and dismal ratings.
A special screening of the film "Reel Bad Arabs" was held, in order to argue that Arabs and Muslims deserve more favorable coverage from the media and Hollywood. The film is narrated by Jack Shaheen, who recently appeared on Al-Jazeera English making charges of anti-Arab media bias.
Very little was said during various panels about the Islamic terrorists who killed almost 3,000 Americans on 9/11 and are currently killing American soldiers and innocent civilians, most of them Muslims, in Iraq. Instead, Bush was blamed for the violence there.
Showing where conference participants stood on the matter of maintaining a U.S. military to defend America against the global Jihad, one of the books on sale at the official conference bookstore was titled, 10 Excellent Reasons Not To Join The Military.
Former conservative David Brock, of another Soros-funded group, Media Matters, labeled the Bush foreign policy of liberating Arab lands as "criminally insane." On the same panel with Brock, Norman Solomon of the Institute for Public Accuracy suggested that U.S. foreign policy was immoral and that the media were working hand-in-glove with the Bush Administration to prepare a military attack on Iran, just as they had done with Iraq.
Reaching new levels of hysteria, Rep. Maurice Hinchey said the survival of America was itself at stake because "neo-fascist" and "neo-con" talk show hosts led by Rush Limbaugh had facilitated the "illegal" war in Iraq and were complicit in President Bush's repeated violations of the Constitution, such as by detaining terrorists. He warned that the "right-wing oriented media" were now preparing the way for Bush to wage war on Iran and Syria.
His answer, a bill titled the "Media Ownership Reform Act," would reinstate the federal fairness doctrine and authorize bureaucrats at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to monitor and alter the content of radio and television programs.
Hinchey, chairman of the "Future of American Media Caucus" in the House, was introduced as the new chairman of a subcommittee with jurisdiction over the FCC. For Hinchey and the vast majority at the conference, there was a pressing need for more, not less, regulation of what they call the "corporate media."
With passage of his bill, Hinchey said that "progressives" would be able to demand and get "equal access" to programs hosted by conservatives and rebut the "baloney" of people like Limbaugh. "All of that stuff will end," Hinchey said about the influence of conservative media. By name, he also denounced Fox News and Sinclair Broadcasting.
Hinchey praised Democratic FCC commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein, who appeared at the conference, and indicated that with the election of a Democratic president in 2008, the FCC could be openly used to frustrate the growing popularity of conservative ideas, perhaps under the cover of resisting "media consolidation."
Later, Hinchey was seen preparing for an appearance on Air America, which had a make-shift studio set up on the premises of the conference.
Protecting Public Broadcasting
Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen, who was just elected to Congress from Memphis, assured the audience that Democrats would protect and possibly increase funding for public broadcasting, which he noted is on the "left hand side of the dial" but has been having problems generating listeners and viewers.
One of the cries of some participants was to "put the public back into public broadcasting," apparently a plea for even more "public" money from Congress.
Public broadcasting's Bill Moyers, who spoke to the conference about the "ravenous" nature of "Big Media," was obviously not referring to public TV or radio's appetite for U.S. tax dollars, even though AIM has documented how these entities have received over $8 billion from the taxpayers since their creation. The far-left Pacifica Radio, another taxpayer-supported network, had a heavy presence at the "media reform" conference.
The appearance of Moyers, who served as White House press secretary in the Lyndon Johnson Administration before he worked for CBS News and public TV, was curious, at least at this conference in Memphis, because he had been aware at the time of his service to LBJ of secret surveillance of Martin Luther King, Jr.
King was assassinated in Memphis in 1968 and his birthday celebration on January 15 was mentioned by several speakers, most notably Jesse Jackson, a former King aide.
One 9/11 truth movement booth featured a poster claiming that King was murdered as the result of a U.S. Government conspiracy, even though James Earl Ray was convicted of the crime and sentenced to prison. Ray died in 1998.
Continuing this fascination with conspiracy theories about the deaths of prominent people, a book for sale at the conference bookstore, titled, American Assassination: The Strange Death of Paul Wellstone, claims that the airplane accident that took the life of the liberal Senator from Minnesota was actually deliberate murder. The book claims Wellstone's "progressive" stands made him a target.
Senator Sanders, the only open socialist in Congress, accused the media of covering up King's opposition to the Vietnam War. He did not mention that King took that approach because he had come under the influence of identified top members of the Soviet-funded Communist Party USA, who had become his close advisers. This is one of the reasons why the Johnson Administration—and then-Attorney General Bobby Kennedy—approved FBI surveillance of him.
King's radical turn to the left, which detracts from the good work that he did, should not be a taboo topic but it is one of many issues that "progressives" want censored from the media. Another King controversy that is off the table for "progressives" is his well-documented plagiarism.
Socialist For One-Sided Coverage
Sanders, who votes with the Democrats in the Senate despite his official status as an independent socialist, claimed conservatives were 99 percent in control of talk radio and that it was time "to open the question of the fairness doctrine again" to restrict what they say and how they say it.
He faulted the media for covering two sides of the global warming debate "when there is no debate in the scientific community."
Clearly, therefore, the purpose in proposing a "fairness doctrine" is not to offer different points of view but to silence viewpoints liberals regard as unsound or unpopular.
Sanders indicated he would introduce a Senate version of the Hinchey bill.
A similar bill, the "Fairness in Broadcasting Act," was sponsored by Democratic Rep. Louise Slaughter, the chairman of the House Rules Committee that has enormous influence over what bills are brought up for votes.
The Rev. Jesse Jackson, the object of fawning media coverage despite the scandal of producing a child from an extramarital affair, argued before the conference for "the right to be heard" and insisted that the major media were not telling the real story of pain and suffering in George Bush's America.
Despite claiming to be for open debate and discussion, he recently urged consumers to boycott DVDs of the Seinfeld comedy show because the actor who plays one of the characters had been caught making racist comments in a night club. Jackson had the actor, Michael Richards, on his radio show to apologize for the remarks.
Suggesting the real agenda behind "media reform," Jackson said that the key to Democrats winning "is more access to the media."
That may depend, however, on how the "progressives" market their unpopular ideas, especially when they actively begin their congressional campaign of suppressing viewpoints in opposition to their own.
Making himself out to be a victim, Jackson said that he should be called by the media for comments on foreign policy issues like Iraq, rather than just racial controversies like the Duke rape case.
Clearly staking out a position on the far-left fringe, Jackson accused Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of taking "baby steps" legislatively when she should be exercising "bold leadership." On Iraq, he said, "you can't be against the war and for the war budget." Rather than just raise the minimum wage, he said Pelosi should introduce a massive new jobs program. He concluded his remarks by asking people to watch his TV program on The Word television network and to tune into his "Keep Hope Alive" radio show on 50 stations.
Republicans As Thieves
At a panel moderated by Paul Waldman of Media Matters, Steve Freeman of the University of Pennsylvania argued that the 2004 presidential election was stolen on behalf of George W. Bush. His associate, Jonathan Simon of the Election Defense Alliance, took to the microphone during the question-and-answer period to argue that the 2006 elections were rigged as well and that the Republicans are preparing to steal the 2008 presidential election. Waldman, who claimed to be dedicated to factual accuracy in covering current events, didn't dispute any of this. In fact, he stated his belief that Al Gore had won the 2000 election and that the media knew it.
Another panelist, Cornell Belcher, the official pollster for the Democratic National Committee, seemed to be taken aback by the conspiracy theories and pointed out that the Democrats had, in fact, made substantial gains on the federal and state levels in 2006.
However, during a conversation over breakfast, Freeman reiterated his belief that the Democrats had won far more seats than they were given credit for in 2006. Asked why they wouldn't protest the stealing of votes, he said, "Democrats are in on it." He described Republicans and Democrats as the A team and B team, and that when one team makes too many mistakes, the other goes in for relief. Asked for his opinion on the 9/11 truth movement, he said, "Nothing would surprise me."
A panel on "Media, War, and Impeachment," featured Jeff Cohen, founder of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, whose December 2006 magazine features Hugo Chavez of Venezuela on the cover as he addressed the U.N. holding up a copy of Noam Chomsky's book on the dangers of American "hegemony." That was the appearance in which Chavez labeled Bush the devil.
The article inside the magazine by FAIR's Steve Rendall accused the American media of unfairly criticizing Chavez for "challenging the U.S.," not because he makes absurd charges, chums around with people such as the anti-Semitic and anti-American Iranian president, and threatens press freedom in his own country. Promising "Socialism or death," Chavez was just sworn in for another presidential term.
On Saturday night, as participants prepared for an event that featured Jane Fonda, they were given copies of a four-page flier advertising Bob Avakian's book, From Ike to Mao and Beyond. The flier said that Avakian, the leader of the Revolutionary Communist Party, has been described by Cornell West of Princeton University as "a long distance runner in the freedom struggle against imperialism, racism and capitalism."
Scott Lee, an RCP "helper" passing out the fliers, told me that he thought the conference was worthwhile but too heavily tilted in favor of the Democratic Party. He said he wasn't aware that global capitalist George Soros had funded the left-wing conference organizers but that the money had gone for a good cause.
This is what passes for "progressivism" these days. It is a clear danger to freedom at home and abroad.
What You Can Do
Please send the enclosed postcards to Senator Sanders and Rep. Hinchey, asking them to cease their efforts to muzzle their opponents in the media.
Also, please let us know if you will support Accuracy in Media in a national campaign to stop the reimposition of the so-called federal fairness doctrine on the conservative media.
Please enclose a financial contribution so AIM can expose the shocking facts about the "media reform" movement to a national audience.
CLIFF'S NOTES
by Cliff Kincaid
DEAR FELLOW MEDIA WATCHDOG: January 22, 2007
ACCURACY IN MEDIA HAS BLOWN THE LID OFF THE SO-CALLED "MEDIA Reform" movement. Nationally syndicated radio host Laura Ingraham had me on her show to talk about it, and I have done many other interviews as well. You hold in your hands my exclusive and shocking report on what transpired in Memphis, Tennessee, when more than 2,000 "progressive" activists gathered to press for federal government action, in the form of a resurrected "fairness doctrine," to silence or mute conservative media. In addition to members of the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) being there, I have now learned that members of the old Soviet-line Communist Party USA were there, too. The RCP, the largest Maoist group in the U.S., follows the teachings of history's greatest mass murderer, Mao Tse-tung. We have also learned that John Nichols, one of the founders of the group sponsoring the conference, Free Press, was personally rubbing elbows with some of these identified communists in a broader movement designed to impeach President Bush and force a U.S. defeat in Iraq. That movement, which calls itself the World Can't Wait coalition, held a National Press Club news conference on January 4 to press for the impeachment of President Bush. Free Press, as we note, is heavily subsidized by leftist billionaire George Soros. Nichols was at the January 4 event, along with Sunsara Taylor of the RCP newspaper, Revolution. These are dangerous people with dangerous ideas. AIM is taking the leading in exposing them.
IT IS AMAZING THAT THE CONGRESS, WHICH DID NOTHING TO STOP AL-JAZEERA ENGLISH from trying to gain access to U.S. media markets, would consider passing the federal fairness doctrine to silence people like Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh. This shows the skewed priorities on Capitol Hill, now that the liberals have taken over. We have had our disagreements with O'Reilly and Limbaugh, but we have never believed that the answer to their distortions and inaccuracies is a federal law to force them to incorporate other views into their programs. AIM once believed that a fairness doctrine was justified, when the news and information provided to the American people came from three broadcasting networks run by liberals. But in this day and age, when there has been an explosion of alternative media, such an approach cannot be justified. President Reagan was right to do away with it. The liberals in Congress, who I name in this report, want it back because, as they openly state, they don't like the information the conservative media are providing. Their approach smacks of how Soviet communist bureaucrats dealt with their political opponents. It's no wonder identified communists are backing this campaign.
I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU, AIM MEMBERS AND SUPPORTERS. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT we should make opposition to the fairness doctrine into a national campaign? We have led the way so far, having covered the conference in Memphis and followed up with a column about communist involvement in the "media reform" effort. But in order to conduct a national campaign, complete with ads in the media and on the Internet, we will need to raise tens of thousands of dollars. You can tell us what you think by sending us the enclosed postcard, along with a contribution toward this effort. Increasingly, we are being looked to as THE source of information on this growing controversy. If it had not been for AIM sending me to the Memphis "media reform" conference, which cost thousands of dollars, the ugly facts about this sinister movement would have escaped national attention. I personally believe this effort is worth a lot more time and attention. But we need the funds to mount the effort that I believe is necessary to stop this insidious campaign to use the federal government to muzzle conservative media voices. Please use the enclosed postcard to let me know what you think.
IN ORDER TO PASS THIS SO-CALLED "FAIRNESS DOCTRINE" INTO LAW, THE LIBERAL CONGRESS will need a liberal Democrat in the White House who will sign the bill. That's why the much-hyped presidential candidacy of Senator Barack Obama, and the just-announced entry into the race of Senator Hillary Clinton, is so important. We can expect the major media to do everything possible to pave the way for a Democrat to win the White House in 2008.
HAVING COME SO FAR, IN TERMS OF MAKING IT POSSIBLE FOR MORE VOICES TO BE HEARD in the media, it would be so tragic if all of this were put in peril. But that is the situation that faces us. All of the progress that has been made can be jeopardized by a liberal Congress intent on silencing its political opponents in the media. I find it astonishing that liberals or socialists like Rep. Hinchey and Senator Sanders would openly threaten the conservative media in such a manner. It shows they have no compunctions about using their power in open violation of the First Amendment right to free speech. But don't expect the liberal media to blow the whistle on this scheme. You can anticipate coverage of this campaign to take the form of guaranteeing "equal access" to the media. The "fairness doctrine" will be described as just that—an effort to assure "fair" coverage of news and public affairs. The liberal media will conveniently forget to mention that the sponsors of the effort have targeted conservative media for "reform."
SOME PEOPLE HAVE TOLD ME THAT THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE, IF ENACTED INTO LAW, would not be upheld by the Supreme Court. That's not necessarily the case. After all, the Supreme Court upheld the McCain-Feingold so-called campaign finance reform law, which restricted the First Amendment rights of advocacy groups in the period right before an election. The Supreme Court has changed, with the addition of two new conservative justices, Roberts and Alito, but it would be a mistake to let this "media reform" effort go forward unchallenged, thinking that its legislative initiatives would be eventually struck down. That is why we need to make our voices known now. Please send the other postcards to Rep. Hinchey and Senator Sanders, in order to let them know that the American people object to congressional meddling with free speech rights.
HERE'S HOW IT WOULD WORK IN REAL LIFE. A "PROGRESSIVE" ACTIVIST OR GROUP WOULD hear something objectionable on O'Reilly or Limbaugh or some other show and file a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC could decide that the complaint was valid, and that the show should accommodate dissenting views. It would order the program to comply, by providing a certain amount of airtime, or face severe financial penalties or worse. These "progressive" activists are already very well-organized and ready to go. I was there in Memphis, watching them in action. They know what they're doing and where they want to go. And their objective is to silence the voices they find objectionable. As I note in my report, two of the speakers at the conference were Democratic members of the FCC. With a Democratic president who could appoint a liberal FCC chairman, they would have a margin of 3-2 and be able to enforce a fairness doctrine passed by Congress. It's a frightening thought but one that could very easily come to pass. At this time, AIM has exposed their plans for all to see. Do we have your confidence and support to proceed full force against them? I will anxiously await your response.
For Accuracy in Media,
Cliff Kincaid
Editor
0 Comments | Post a Comment
