Accuracy in Media

With the media in disarray, even in meltdown, over their failure to prevent Donald Trump from winning the presidency last month, the issue of “fake news” has become an urgent concern. What is really of greater concern? Fake websites that are established to make money and discredit their political opponents? Or is it the establishment media that are pushing a political agenda, while claiming to adhere to high standards of journalism?

An armed man recently traveled from North Carolina to search for sexually exploited minors at a pizza shop in Washington, DC—he had been taken in by a phony Internet conspiracy theory known as PizzaGate. This incident has fed the so-called mainstream media with additional reasons to publish stories highlighting the dangers of fake news and online conspiracies.

However, as the creators of fake news are exposed, it becomes clear that these sites are often motivated by making money—while mainstream media organizations use fake news as a means of furthering the Obama administration and the “progressive” agenda.

Georgian citizen Beqa Latsabidze “was savvy enough to change course when he realized what did drive traffic: laudatory stories about Donald J. Trump that mixed real—and completely fake—news in a stew of anti-Clinton fervor,” reported The New York Times on November 25. “Mr. Latsabidze said his only incentive was to make money from Google ads by luring people off Facebook pages and onto his websites,” it reported. Ironically, Latsabidze found that he wasn’t able to make any money publishing “gushing” stories about Hillary Clinton.

Another fake news writer, Jestin Coler, met with MSNBC News to detail his exploits.

“And lately there’s been a lot of coverage in the real news about the growing and booming business of creating fake news,” said Brian Williams on his December 5 show, “The 11th Hour with Brian Williams.” Coler helped organize the dissemination of a fake news story on the “Denver Guardian” about an FBI agent murder-suicide: “FBI Agent Suspected In Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead In Apparent Murder-Suicide.”

“This is one that I would probably take back,” Coler told MSNBC. “And even, to kind of add to that, Google closed all the accounts that were running on the site, so even that money is gone.” Coler, the fake news propagator, admitted to MSNBC that he’s a Hillary Clinton supporter, and in fact voted for her.

In an interview with NPR, Coler wouldn’t cite exact numbers, but said that his fake news grossed similarly to others making $10,000 to $30,000 a month.

Yet, despite the lucrative business, Coler claims that he created these stories to undermine the so-called alt-right and Trump supporters. “The whole idea from the start was to build a site that could infiltrate the echo chambers of the alt-right, publish blatantly false or fictional stories and then be able to publicly denounce those stories and point out the fact that they were fiction,” he told NPR. As for Trump, “His whole campaign was this thing of discrediting mainstream media sources, which is one of those dog whistles to his supporters…He knew who his base was. He knew how to feed them a constant diet of this red meat.” It should be noted that Coler started working on this back in 2013.

The mainstream media’s fascination with exposing fake news writers such as Coler revolves around the desire to prove that their own reporting is above reproach, and should be trusted. A Gallup poll shows that current trust in the media is hovering at 32 percent, and bottoming out at 14 percent among Republicans.

It’s not as if readers don’t have reasons to distrust the media. Brian Williams’ broadcast regarding the fake news industry was an exercise in irony, and just shows what’s wrong with mainstream reporting today. He is, in effect, the recent “godfather” of fake news, having spread false tales for years about his alleged adventure in Iraq in a Chinook helicopter under fire. Actually, Breitbart has documented more than 30 examples of Williams telling lies or disputed stories. So when he is introducing a story about fake news, do he and his producers think we’ve all forgotten what got him suspended last year?

As we recently reported, the media continue to provide false and misleading reports about Obama’s Iran deal, which is not an actual deal but merely a set of political commitments. Yet most major newspapers and TV networks continue to report that the Iran deal is “signed,” which it isn’t.

We’ve also documented how fake news has allowed President Obama to claim success in everything from fixing the economy, to improving healthcare, to making the world a more peaceful place, to having a scandal-free eight years as president. His actual record, in each case, is quite different.

The reason that the media continue to obsess over fake news stories is that when viewed in contrast, they appear more credible at a time when their public credibility is in short supply. Generally, the fake news stories they are now reporting about are easy to detect. But if the news media continue to publish stories that mislead the public, then they are no better than the online peddlers of fake news, and more of a threat to the marketplace of ideas.

David Harsanyi of The Federalist explained why the left is pushing this issue of fake news so hard. He wrote, “Now that Democrats have sort of moved on from blaming the Electoral College and James Comey and the Russians, they’re absolutely convinced that ‘fake news’ turned the election against Hillary Clinton (although it’s still a mystery why they lost more than 1,000 other seats since Obamacare was passed).”

Pamela Geller, the president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), writing for Breitbart, has an even harsher assessment of what the left is up to: “I always understood that the objective was to taint the conservative news-sphere. Sites were created to spread disinformation and shame the right-wingers who jumped on it. This is classic disinformation. It’s always games, games, games…from the people who brought you Soros’ rent-a-mob—rioting, looting and destruction in cities, etc. even going so far as to risk a few deaths all for the cause. But what I didn’t see coming is their ultimate goal: the shut-down of free speech. The left wants to crush free speech, which has been in their cross-hairs for some time now.”

Geller asks, “If a blogger or news writer gets a story wrong, does that designate him or her, or his or her site, as ‘fake news’? If that’s the case, they’ll have to shut down the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, CNN, etc. They get things wrong all the time.”

Indeed they do.




Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.

Comments

  • David

    We have reached a point where the media no longer deserves protection by the First Amendment. The press has violated their public trust and proven that they need a watchdog to keep them honest.

  • jaimelmanzano

    Fake news isn’t the half of it. What about media opinionating intent on agitating and misleading the public? Democratic governance just isn’t herding cats. It calls for leading the human herd, not like lemmings, but like. say, cattle, producing nourishment for living. Recognize that the media can, and has, led the nation into wars of questionable benefit. Recall their role in the Tonkin Gulf, or Remember the Maine.

  • Fake news is a product of the MSM, primarily. “You can keep your doctor…”. Unemployment is only 4.9%. Katie Couric and the edited response from the NRA interviwees. Hillary Clinton and her e-mails, etc.

    Unfortunately, the so-called MSM will not own up to their own biases. Some are simply in denial, some are outright liars, and some are just plain zealots. The Constitution, alas, requires only a free press, not a fair one.

  • tkrepel

    How much money has AIM made from promoting the fake news created by charlatan filmmaker Joel Gilbert?

  • Bruce

    Don’t take away our “conspiracy theory” web-sites! After the Ohio State violence a couple of weeks ago, I rushed to get the name of the offender. No MSM would name him or his “religion” until I found them both on Infowars.com. I subsequently deleted all those MSM sites– only keeping Infowars and Aim.org as Legitimate news sites.

  • Steven Barrett

    Readers, watchers and listeners have a responsibility to examine whatever they first come across and start asking a series of quick questions the moment they start suspecting loose strings in the story, especially anything that smacks of sensationalism or purposefully malicious in the first two lead paragraphs. You’d be working with your local papers, radio and television stations, not I hope, unless there’s sound reason to believe some criminal behavior, actual criminal conduct is underway and you have direct evidence that could stand up in court. No hearsay, no “I think” or “It sounded like,” but actual first hand knowledge of something worth investigating. If false stories get published, and the person who first gave it to the media and or local officials at the same time and wasn’t on the level, well, few people will pity what that individual will go through when put on the stand. And for solid reasons. Good solid journalism doesn’t necessarily mean the most “interesting” kinds of stories that bleed on the first page and “above the fold,” to boot. They just have to be truthful, however boring that might seem at first glance. LOL, Watergate sure fit that opening description.

  • Gz7

    Trump supporters can spot fake news. That’s one reason he won.