Accuracy in Media

This is the second in a three-part series.

In Part 1 of this series, we discussed the content and tone of the political rhetoric leftist propagandists use to criticize the proposed GOP health care plans vis-à-vis ObamaCare. In part 2, we will describe the propaganda efforts used by progressives to cite dubious statistics to tar and misrepresent the U.S. health care system.

A recent commentary illustrates this propaganda. An article in The British Medical Journal entitled, “Medical error — the third leading cause of death in the U.S,” compares our “broken system” to those of other industrialized nations that purportedly are cheaper and better.

The Journal article cited by the author, in fact, had a significant caveat. “Medical error is not included on death certificates or in rankings of cause of death,” the article stated. The statement about medical error is “only an estimate by two researchers,” and “better reporting” is needed. Indeed, let’s begin with the British themselves.

British officials are so proud of their National Health Service they are willing to concoct figures, not only to praise their system, but also to lie about the fact they ration health care by queues and waiting lists, restrictions to specialists and access to life-saving medical treatments, and even outright denial of medical care to the elderly.

The Dallas-based National Center for Policy Analysis has pointed out that although the NHS claims, “British patients deaths or serious injuries due to medical errors is 11,000 cases a year,” the reality is quite different. As early as 2009, the House of Commons Health Select Committee reported, “thousands of NHS mistakes are covered up and that a better estimate is that 72,000 patients die each year.”

So much for medical errors in the U.S., which indeed occur, but at least are more objectively and accurately reported. Hidden in the statistics is the fact not only are the poor and disabled properly and promptly treated in the U.S., but the elderly are aggressively treated. In the U.S., potentially life-saving treatments, which carry risks for complications, are administered to patients seeking them in consultation with their physicians. These increase the chances for untoward reactions that are then reported as “medical errors” by medical and eagerly critical public health researchers.

Truth be told, Americans want the best health care money can buy and that prolongs life as long as possible – sometimes to excess. This reached the point that some progressive academicians have even proposed to restrict access to medical care at a certain age — proposals that have not been acceptable to the general population.

When comparing U.S. health care to those of the social democracies of Western Europe and other industrialized nations, proponents of socialized medicine (i.e., single payer system) argue about lower costs and alleged better medical care “in other industrialized nations.” In a recent article, Dr. David Stolinsky succinctly encapsulates the argument:

“We are told that despite all the money we spend on health care, America does not rank with the best in regard to infant and maternal mortality or in life expectancy. In fact, the difference is minimal. Life expectancy at birth for the European Union is 78.67 years, while that for the U.S. is 78.11 years ? only six months shorter.”

Progressive academicians and other proponents of socialized medicine neglect to mention the our mortality statistics also are affected by dramatic increases in fatal drug abuse and epidemic proportions of black-on-black crime.

Dr. Stolinsky asks:  “So what is killing Americans before the age of 60? Americans are. The No.1 cause of death for African-American males from the ages of 15 to 34 is homicide. Faster ambulance response and more trauma centers may reduce this figure somewhat. But clearly, this is not a problem of health care.”

Another problem is illegal immigration and providing necessary care to those coming from across the southern border. Dr. Stolinsky writes: “If women come across the border eight months pregnant, never having seen a doctor, is the fetal and maternal mortality a problem of health care? If pregnant and nursing mothers drink alcohol or use illegal drugs, can doctors solve the problem?”

Europeans are just now experiencing legal and illegal immigration on a large scale. Let’s wait and see new data and projecting statistics from Germany and Italy — that is, if officials are honest and release authentic data.

Although we could have used data from Los Angeles or Chicago, the drug and crime capitals of the United States, Dr. Stolinsky chose to use data from the District of Columbia in Washington, DC, to illustrate the problems of the inner cities. (It should be noted these three metropolitan areas are located in states or districts with the strictest gun control laws in the United States.) After describing the toll that crime, life-threatening sexually transmitted diseases, such as hepatitis and AIDS, as well as drug abuse have taken in the inner cities, Dr. Stolinsky writes:

“If you doubt this, check out the life expectancy and the rates of infant and maternal mortality in the various states. Compare the best figures with those from the District of Columbia, which is similar to other inner cities. For example, the maternal mortality rate for DC is 34.9 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, compared with 2.7 in Massachusetts. The infant mortality rate in DC is 14.1 per 1,000 live births, compared with 4.5 in Utah. The life expectancy in DC is 72.0 years, compared with 80.0 years in Hawaii.”

In short, these statistics provide ample reason for why U.S. mortality rates do not surpass the Europeans.

Admittedly, as evinced by Dr. Stolinsky’s aforementioned statistics, the U.S. has its share of social problems because of our generosity in bestowing benefits, lenient immigration policy and permissive criminal justice system. But those are not problems with our medical care system.

If the U.S. health care system is so “broken,” as claimed by leftist propagandists, why do so many foreign dignitaries and private citizens still come to the U.S. seeking medical treatment? Why do Canadians, who have a fully socialized health care system, go south of the border to receive medical care in the U.S.? Why are an astounding 60 percent of Nobel Prizes in Medicine or Physiology won by American medical scientists? Why are cancer survival rates in the U.S. so much higher than in the rest of the world? Obviously, these questions answer themselves.

Certainly, there are problems in the U.S. health care system — for example, medical care delivery and prescription drugs are too expensive. The underlying cause of the problem is government involvement in health care. In a subsequent column, we will discuss how the free market has been perverted by government interference and further contravene other false claims promulgated by proponents of socialized medicine.

————-

Miguel A. Faria, M.D. is a retired clinical professor of neurosurgery and long time medical editor. He is the author of Vandals at the Gates of Medicine (1995); Medical Warrior: Fighting Corporate Socialized Medicine (1997); and Cuba in Revolution — Escape From a Lost Paradise (2002). His website is http://www.haciendapub.com.





Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.

Comments

  • samo war
  • Mark Midas

    Obamacare is about Brave New World genetic engineering. The so-called affordable (that’s a real joke) health care law uses “civil rights” quotas to force hospitals, research labs and medical schools to hire and train more people with sick minds who will let newborns die in stainless steel pans, kill elderly patients and probably dispense HIV virus to healthy patients.

    That’s why Ted “woman-killer and illegal immigration” Kennedy and 60 Minutes so hated HMOs (health maintenance organizations). Did 60 Minutes ever do even one story about how Democrats were largely responsible for the injustices and horrors of sterilization, selective breeding, racial purification and more? Of course not! But 60 Minutes did produce a lot of segments on supposed problems with HMOs, which had faults, but which were an emerging and better — but private — solution to health care costs and services. HMOs held promise, but Democrats couldn’t have any of that because they wanted only to serve the Marxist-Darwinist agenda, not people, and that means health care must be state-controlled.

  • TED

    Baloney! What the hell’s the difference how good U.S. healthcare is if it’s not available to the entire population … or a huge portion of the population can’t afford it?

  • Bill W

    Health care was affordable until the states and feds got involved to help us. Having insurers include gov’t favorites raises costs. Get the gov’t out of healthcare and back to free market to cut costs. Everyone involved in health care has become greedy with no competition to stem it. Even hospitals are giving millions in bonuses – non profit is only a term. Greed, when properly controlled by competition, is not a terrible thing. Single payer would be a disaster since there would be many restrictions – British officials are so proud of their National Health Service they are willing to concoct figures, not only to praise their system, but also to lie about the fact they ration health care by queues and waiting lists, restrictions to specialists and access to life-saving medical treatments, and even outright denial of medical care to the elderly.

  • Willy Bean

    Hog wash. First, 26 million out of 300 million is not “a huge portion.” Second, no one dies in the street as Dr. Faria says. Health care is available to everyone, others pay! Third, Hospitals have to treat all by federal law. Fourth, the poor Medicaid patient is frequently better off than a middle class guy with no insurance and having to pay a penalty; and if he has insurance, having to pay huge premiums other ObamaCare and still subsidize others!

  • AndRebecca

    I take it you don’t really live in the U.S. and have no idea about the public health care system which we’ve had for eighty plus years. We have county hospitals everywhere, and as the 1960 TV show “Ramparts” showed, everyone gets to go to the hospital, no problem. We started having high prices and high insurance costs as the Democrats started pushing the “right” of healthcare so the government could take it over. The takeover has always been to break the bank and cause the military to go down the tubes as it is in Europe. Do you ever get outside and see hospitals, schools, and other government buildings and wonder what they do in them?

  • urbisoler

    Get medical care out of the hands of the federal government. If private industry cannot take care of the indigent, then let each State generate a plan of its own. Those States who cannot compete financially will need some financial input from the fed. What we must start thinking about is indebtedness at all levels of government. Inevitably that should mean downsizing government. Where to start?? Think LOW priority. Think NASA. With all the problems in the world and in the U.S., why on Earth are we thinking of a MARS mission??? Shut down NASA !!!

  • BikeIce

    Obamacare made it unaffordable for many. It only enrolled 10 million out of 40 million uninsured and most of those were shoved on to the Medicaid/Medical rolls. Obviously the other 30 million chose not to enroll, even if it was government subsidized. There are people who don’t see the need for sickness care insurance and that is called FREEDOM OF CHOICE. If they get sick, they still get treated and either pay for their care themselves, or go to a county hospital and it is paid for by the county. This is exactly what millions of illegal aliens do.

    Sickness care is available to everyone in this country.

    Health care on the other hand is an individual choice and involves taking care of yourself by eating right, exercising, taking supplements and hormones, avoiding environmental toxins like GMO’s, vaccines, fluoridated/chlorinated water, etc. You don’t need insurance to stay healthy………….you need KNOWLEDGE which is in short supply due to massive lame stream misinformation and lies…..funded by Big Pharma of course to keep you sick and dependent on doctors, hospitals and their poisons.

  • chuck

    We have some of the best Healthcare We have some of the worst Health Insurance They are two different matters

  • The Texan

    Health care is much better in the United States than any of the countries listed in that report. Most of the criteria listed in that report had little to do with the quality of actual medical treatment and recovery. Not long ago there was another paper on conditions at a number of British hospitals. Not to put to fine a point on it, those conditions were deplorable.

  • eric

    US healthcare is the world best as far as being the most expensive that is for sure . It is so much more expensive than health care for Foreign workers plus there wages is usually a lower cost than health care alone in America . So if this is not fixed the United States workers can’t possibly compete on price And in the business price is very important consideration

  • eric

    The health care costs are different for different people the county pays for Medicaid and they get a lower charge , the uninsured get charged the most of all because the nurse told me they have to make up for all the people that don’t pay . I had to pay three time more than what the charges for a patient with insurance paid . Finally the health care industry has to hire special medical billers to figure out the bills .. They don’t do any work at all for a 1000 dollars . We need the government to control these prices . There are just to many people adding on extra charges to these medical bills .