Accuracy in Media

The mainstream media continue their misleading reporting about President Donald Trump’s executive order, which calls for temporarily limiting immigration into the United States from seven countries, and a review of refugee policy. The media have blatantly sought to undermine Trump’s initiatives.

Judge James Robart, who serves on the District Court for the Western District of Washington State, asked the Department of Justice representative, “How many arrests have there been of foreign nationals for those seven countries since 9/11?” Robart then continued, saying, “The answer to that is none, as best I can tell.”

Well, Judge Robart is wrong. Data provided to Congress indicates that between September 11, 2001 and December 31, 2014, “at least 60” persons from those seven countries were convicted “of terror-related offenses,” writes Byron York for The Washington Examiner. There may have been more, since an additional 129 persons convicted of these crimes were “of unknown origin,” York reports.

Yet ABC News sought to downplay the security risk individuals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen pose. Instead, it reports that “Only eight of the 78 attacks that appeared on a White House list of terrorist incidents over the past two years were committed by individuals from the seven countries affected by Donald Trump’s immigration order…”

In other words, ABC is arguing that the travel pause would have little national security benefit. “In fact, the list provided by the White House shows Americans were responsible for more attacks than those from the seven banned countries combined,” reports ABC News.

The media have clearly chosen a side in the debate about the travel pause, and are willing to deceive their audience. In a recent appearance on CNN’s The Situation Room, Wolf Blitzer got into a discussion with Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID) over Obama’s immigration record, and its similarity to Trump’s recent immigration executive order.

“There’s absolutely no evidence that this [Trump’s action] is unconstitutional or illegal,” said Labrador, a former immigration attorney, on CNN. “In fact, the President of the United States, our previous president, President Obama, did the same actions three times during his administration. There wasn’t a single protest.”

“There were some nuance—there were some differences. We don’t have to go through all of that,” replied Blitzer.

Why did Blitzer not want to get into specifics with Rep. Labrador? It might have informed his viewers. Instead, Blitzer aired a misleading clip featuring former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani.

According to the edited clip, Giuliani stated, “When he [Trump] first announced it, he said Muslim ban. He called me up, he said, put a commission together, show me the right way to do it legally.”

Blitzer doubled down after airing the misleading Giuliani clip, saying, “So, basically, what Rudy Giuliani helped him come up with was this formula for having a Muslim ban, but not calling it a Muslim ban.”

LABRADOR: You’re misleading a little bit, Wolf.
BLITZER: Tell me why.
LABRADOR: If you listen to the entire interview…Rudy Giuliani said…that a Muslim ban would be unconstitutional, illegal.
BLITZER: You believe that?

Blitzer, like so many in the media, is skeptical that Trump might have had other than bigoted motives. He is clearly taking a side in this argument, and abandoning journalistic impartiality.

NBC had been called out just the day before for showing this deceptively edited clip. In full context, Giuliani continued by saying, “And what we did was we focused on, instead of religion, danger. The areas of the world that create danger for us, which is a factual basis, not a religious basis. Perfectly legal, perfectly sensible, and that’s what the ban is based on.”

Opponents of Trump’s travel pause claim that the President’s immigration executive order is religiously motivated and discriminatory. So, too, The Wall Street Journal reports that critics note that “all seven affected nations are majority Muslim…”

The media, and Democrats, are engaging in hysteria by labeling this a “Muslim ban.” This is worse than hyperbole—it is deception. After all, Indonesia, Pakistan, Egypt, and other countries have significant Muslim populations and yet have not been blocked. An estimated 85 percent of all Muslims are not affected by Trump’s executive order.

We are right now contemplating no other countries,” Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly told Congress this week, admitting the executive order was rolled out too hastily, for which he himself took the blame.

“The bottom line is that Trump is improving security screening and intends to admit refugees at close to the average rate of the 15 years before Obama’s dramatic expansion in 2016,” wrote David French for National Review, in a sober analysis of what the executive order does and does not do. “Obama’s expansion was a departure from recent norms, not Trump’s contraction.”

To his detriment, President Trump appears to be getting in the way of his own potential success. He argued at a recent meeting of law enforcement officials in Washington that “A bad high school student would understand this. Anybody would understand this.” In other words, he argued, a clear reading of the law should grant the government victory in this case.

This is a misstep by Trump. It is, as The Hill reports, “highly unusual for presidents to publicly comment on court cases dealing with their policy proposals,” especially when a case is open.

Trump is also putting the judiciary in a position to directly challenge him; he has made this into a high-profile showdown with his inept utterances.

Trump also asserted that the media have not sufficiently covered terrorist incidents. Trump told troops at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa this week that “It’s gotten to a point where it’s [terror] not even reported, and in many cases the very, very dishonest press doesn’t even want to report it.” His administration then issued a list of 78 attacks that had taken place between September 2014 and December 2016. The liberal media had a field day with the list, citing misspellings and proclaiming that they had covered many of those events, often for days at a time. National Public Radio (NPR), for example, claims this was false, because most news organizations covered the attacks in Paris; San Bernardino, California; the Orlando night club; and others.

But, as Robert Spencer points out for Jihad Watch, it is not the act of covering the attacks for which the media have been derelict—it is how these events are covered. “But in virtually all cases, they did all they could to obscure the motivating ideology behind those attacks,” writes Spencer. “They deliberately conceal and/or misrepresent the aspects of them that make it clear that they’re Islamic jihad attacks. This is in accord with the guidelines of the Society of Professional Journalists, which tells journalists not to connect Islam with terrorism, and to obscure that connection wherever possible.”

Once a terrorist has been confirmed to have Islamic jihadist ties, the media then question whether the attacker was a “self-radicalized lone wolf.” Whether these jihadi terrorists were inspired by the Islamic State or al Qaeda, or were directed members of these terrorist groups, makes little difference. Islamic jihadist terrorists drink from the same poisonous well.

Perhaps the starkest example of the treatment of such an act, by the Obama administration and the media, was the case of Major Nidal Hasan, who murdered 13 and injured 32 others at Fort Hood in Killeen, Texas back in September of 2009. For approximately five years the case was treated as “workplace violence.” It wasn’t until 2015—nearly three years after 150 family members who struggled to pay their medical bills filed a lawsuit—that the government switched its position and gave the wounded victims Purple Hearts, which carried with them added medical benefits and the acknowledgement that they had been wounded in the line of duty.

As long as the public allows it, the media will continue to avoid honest discussions about the real terror threat that jihadists and potential terrorists from these seven countries—and others—pose to the health and welfare of American citizens.

Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.


  • Ted

    It’s absurd to expect that the Muslims who are supposedly the greatest terrorist threats to the U.S. come just from the seven countries listed in the order. What about Muslims from France … England … Spain … even Canada … and untold numbers of other countries?

    Trump and the new and worse creatures he’s populated the swamp with are just a big bunch of absurdists who all seem not to know their ***** from the elbows.

  • Tbear

    In 1952, Congress passed the Immigration and Nationality Act – a law empowering the president to deny entry into the U.S. to “any class of aliens” considered to be “detrimental to the interests of the United States.” In other words, a threat to America and in the interests of national security.

    The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 grants “the President broad
    authority to bar or impose conditions upon the entry of aliens,” reports the CRS,
    a federal organization that provides authoritative, impartial and nonpartisan
    analysis of major issues for members of Congress.

    The law’s main limit on his powers is simply that “the President must have
    found that the entry of any aliens or class of aliens would be ‘detrimental to
    the interests of the United States.’”
    However, that’s not much of a limit at all, the CRS
    notes, because the law does not specify what is, or isn’t, detrimental. It’s up to the president to decide.

    Furthermore, the case law to date, while limited, “also
    supports the view that this provision of the INA confers broad authority to
    suspend or restrict the entry of aliens.” A 1993 ruling on the topic by the
    U.S. Supreme Court favored the president’s authority. The U.S. District Court
    for Northern California ruled in 1996 that “The
    exclusion of aliens is a fundamental act of sovereignty. The right to do so
    stems not alone from legislative power but is inherent in the executive power
    to control the foreign affairs of the nation. When Congress prescribes a
    procedure concerning the admissibility of aliens, it is not dealing alone with
    a legislative power. It is implementing an inherent executive power.”

  • Martha Bartha

    National Security Right? War on Terror Right? Piss off the Muslims so they’ll attack, right? Allah be Praised!

  • Martha Bartha

    Don’t hold back. Tell us how you really feel.

  • Robert Winkler

    Not to mention the two largest muslim countries; Indonesia and India.

  • David Stewart

    All those desiring Muslim membership; stop the ban! Those perferring their former lives; approve it!

  • Tiger

    This court went beyond it’s bounds, as Thomas Jefferson predicted they would and had trouble with them in his time. This court ignored the fact Trump has the right according to a law written long ago and used by presidents several times, to deny entry to this country by any group of people he deems detrimental to us and as long as he wants. They also knew the EO had already been put to the test, this is what General Kelly explained in his news conference, it was no surprise, they knew Trump was going to do this he spoke of it for 2 years, he knew the legal rights. So this court went outside it’s boundaries and took over the office of the POTUS. The AG has the right to take them off the courts because he has more than enough proof they did just that.

    The problem is that America has strayed so far from the Constitution, from our immigration laws, from all our Laws and Order that they have these dupes in our country convinced that our Constitution protects these people. Our laws our Constitution, our Bill of Rights and our Declaration of Independence applies ONLY TO CITIZENS and that goes for all our government BENEFITS. Now they are like undisciplined children, being raised by hippies, high on their ideals with no understanding of Reality, being thrown, face first into the Real World and with the main media, the Progressive Democrat party and all those in Congress behind them along with the Left Net, they continue to believe this.

    I pray daily for Trump, he is up against the Deep State One World Order and their loss of control over this country, the loss of their almost achieved vision, is driving them insane. We just found out that too many in our Congress, on both sides of the aisle have taken money from George Soros and Soros is behind all these riots. We have strict laws on the books about inciting riots and busing people in etc and we have proof positive Soros did and is doing this. Hopefully he and others will be brought to their knees and stopped.

  • Tiger

    Exactly but this court ignored this and the EO’s authenticity and went straight to Left Talking Points, over stepping it’s bounds and taking over the office of the POTUS. Look up Thomas Jefferson’s comments on the problems of the courts and our AG has the right to take them off the bench, which he should do.

  • Tiger

    Listen Chamberalin, in 1979 when Carter thought such a good idea to give Iran to a religious leader, Khomeini was brought out of exile and put in charge, he found out faster than bunnies multiply what he had done. Khomeini named America the Great Satan and Israel the Little Satan and vowed that it was Islam for the world or the end of Islam, became the number one backer of terrorism, took over our embassies, hijacked our planes, kidnapped, killed 200 Marines in their barracks and according to the bin laden documents found, sponsored al Qaeda, sponsored bin laden and had a hand in 9/11. But of course you don’t seem to get it do you?

    They have been killing us in America since 1972.

    They killed over 3,000 of us on 9/11, tell me what kind of restraints they had on them then by us? We have had 30 attacks under Obama and more that were unreported, over 70 to be exact like Trump said, Obama gave them everything they wanted, brought them in here by the hundreds of thousands so what the Hell are you dupes talking?????????

    You go and join them in the ME and show them the love and see what they give you in return. God Help America.

  • HelloFromTO

    They are already attacking, even with Obama’s kumbaya aproach. It didn’t work.

  • Rick D.

    Very informative article that clearly demonstrates that the media is programmed to slant the news (assuming that it is reported in the 1st place) to undermine Trump. Wolf Blitzer is a low-life piece of human excrement. Anyone who watches his interviews and places any credibility in what he presents will definitely get a distorted perception of the facts.

  • Patriot 2

    George Soros has been designated a TERRORIST to America for inciting the riots, destruction. etc….. They are searching for him

  • Martha Bartha

    Turkey has a huge Muslim Population.

  • Martha Bartha

    Silence, Infidel!

  • Martha Bartha

    Well Obama was raised in a Muslim household.????

  • Tiger

    Lots of luck with that. LOLOL

  • Martha Bartha

    Allah Akbar!?????

  • Tiger

    Allah F’Off bar

  • Martha Bartha

    Oh My! Jihad!???????????

  • David in MA

    Why isn’t this law relevant?

    U.S. Attorneys » Resources » U.S. Attorneys’ Manual » Criminal Resource Manual » CRM 1500-1999 » Criminal Resource Manual 1901-1999

    1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offense

    8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to
    aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic
    transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring
    unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to
    enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and
    abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits
    bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States
    in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry.
    Subsection 1324(a)(3).

    Alien Smuggling — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) makes it an offense
    for any person who — knowing that a person is an alien, to bring to or
    attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such
    person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other
    than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien
    has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside
    in the United States and regardless of any future official action which
    may be taken with respect to such alien.

    Domestic Transporting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an
    offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the
    fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States
    in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or
    move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or
    otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law.

    Harboring — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for
    any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an
    alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation
    of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to
    conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place,
    including any building or any means of transportation.

    Encouraging/Inducing — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an
    offense for any person who — encourages or induces an alien to come to,
    enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard
    of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in
    violation of law.

    Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)
    expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid
    or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.

    Bringing Aliens to the United States — Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes
    it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of
    the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to,
    enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring
    to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of
    any official action which may later be taken with respect to such

    The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
    (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996, added a new 8 U.S.C. §
    1324(a)(3)(A) which makes it an offense for any person, during any
    12-month period, to knowingly hire at least 10 individuals with actual
    knowledge that these individuals are unauthorized aliens. See this Manual at 1908 (unlawful employment of aliens).

    Unit of Prosecution — With regard to offenses defined in subsections
    1324(a)(1)(A)(i)-(v), (alien smuggling, domestic transporting,
    harboring, encouraging/inducing, or conspiracy/aiding or abetting) each
    alien with respect to whom a violation occurs constitutes a unit of
    prosecution. Prior to enactment of the IIRIRA, the unit of prosecution
    for violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) was each transaction, regardless
    of the number of aliens involved. However, the unit of prosecution is
    now based on each alien in respect to whom a violation occurs.

    Knowledge — Prosecutions for alien smuggling, 8 U.S.C. §
    1324(a)(1)(A)(i) require proof that defendant knew that the person
    brought to the United States was an alien. With regard to the other
    violations in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), proof of knowledge or reckless
    disregard of alienage is sufficient.

    Penalties — The basic statutory maximum penalty for violating 8
    U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I) (alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a
    fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both.
    With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii),
    domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or
    aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5
    years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or
    private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment
    is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided
    for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily
    injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results
    in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by
    imprisonment for any term of years. The basic penalty for a violation
    of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not
    more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced
    penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal
    aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial
    advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and
    violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer
    immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). A mandatory
    minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second
    violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment
    is provided for third or subsequent offenses.

  • jreg9304

    In accordance to our great President Trumps recognition of the media, the media is as foul as foul can get. there is no pardon for the problems that the media has, as far as walls put into place that President Trump cannot overcome. Damn the media.

  • Tiger

    And F’iad also.

  • David in MA

    What is wrong with you, your not being funny, your showing a mental illness.

  • Martha Bartha

    Mental Illness runs in my family.???????

  • David in MA

    You must be AKLady’s twin.

  • jreg9304

    There is no slant, the media has been always been distorted and perverted!

  • Martha Bartha

    Twin sons of different Mothers??

  • Gloria Alatorre

    As I understand it, this ban was initiated by former Pres. Obama although he did not act upon it. (Lord knows why). President Trump is just implementing it. Curiously, when Obama signed it nobody complained and the media did not fuss about it; but now that President Trump is enacting the ban for just 120 days, there is so much noise, complaints, riots and disturbances. It is obvious this is another dirty trick (as usual) of the Democratic Party.

  • Tiger


  • Martha Bartha

    Allah be Praised!?????

  • Mark Sauck

    This happens to be the battering ram for the moment. A week or so from now they’ll pick out another to mislead and hammer Trump with lies mixed with half truths and the cycle will go on. As far as I’m concerned, except for a minority of liberal nut cases who believe what they hear from media, the media in this country is my and all of our enemy. This propaganda circus will go on and on believing the ends justify the means and care little about the destruction they will cause in the end. The media is the driveway to the swamp that needs to be drained and it can’t happen fast enough.

  • Roger Pervere

    Your so right on the law and the courts, they all need to be barred from the bench! Trump is in the process of draining the swamp and now he has to drain the courts of the ones that hate the Constitution and our way of Government!

  • Tiger

    Roger we are in deeper than I ever imagined. I knew about a lot then I learned about UN Plan 21/2030, that really made it clear what O and Hillary were into, then I find out that many of our Congress, both sides paid by Soros campaign money, McCain been taking his money since 2001, so that explains that, we already knew there were Communists in there. Now we see the courts have decided they will take over the land and they will make the laws. This is the year 2016 and we allow the courts to override the president?????? He had the US Code giving him the right to per Proclamation take out anyone he wants for as long as he wants and that alone goes without any contention or argument. But no now the POTUS has to appease the courts.

    Now I read where immigrants running to Canada, a Somalian was talking about how they are running out, see our borders were wide open under O and 400 plus a day, men from the worst countries were coming in, O wouldn’t let them stop them, heard this during the congressional hearings so we have not a CLUE how many immigrants from ME are here, where they are or anything.

    We need a ban on immigration to this country from anywhere for 5 years to straighten this mess out. Not only that they all, ALL get benefits to the tune of 1 billion a year. Just imagine the money in our coffers when we follow the law and get them out.

  • Tiger

    OLOLOL Allah be Damned

  • Martha Bartha


  • Tiger

    And damned proud of it raghead.

  • Tiger

    ALI SINA’S Open Challenge To All Muslim’s – $50,000 REWARD- (a must read)

    Posted on November 24, 2012 by Admin


    Sina’s Challenge

    I receive many emails from angry Muslims, who sometimes beg me, and sometimes order me to remove this site.

    I consider both, pleading and bullying, signs of psycho
    pathology.Argumentum ad baculum and argumentum ad misericordiam are both
    logical fallacies.

    If you do not like this site and want me to remove it, instead of acting as a bully or as a victim, disprove
    my charges against Muhammad logically. Not only will I remove the site,
    I will publicly announce that Islam is a true religion.

    I will also pay $50,000 U.S. dollars to anyone who can
    disprove any of the dozen of the accusations that I have made against

    I accuse Muhammad of being:

    a narcissist, a misogynist, a rapist, a pedophile, a lecher,
    a torturer, a mass murderer, a cult leader, an assassin, a terrorist, a
    mad man, a looter.

    I have debated with many Muslims. Their defense of Islam can be summarized in two categories:

    a-Denial of the authenticity of Islamic sources that report the stories
    of crimes of Muhammad (example: debate with Edip Yukssel, a leader of
    the Submitters)

    b-Moral relativism and situational ethics,e.g., ?In those
    days,pedophilia, assassination, rape, raid, pillage, massacre and lying,
    were common practices, so Muhammad is innocent because he did what
    everyone else was doing.Muslims even go as far as to question the
    legitimacy of the Golden Rule to claim I do not have any basis to
    condemn Muhammad.In other words,
    who can say what is good and what is evil? That is up to the messenger
    of God to decide. (Example: debate with Yamin Zakaria) These are the
    main two arguments that Muslims present in defense of Islam. Any
    rational person can see they are logical fallacies.

    These charges are irrefutable. You simply can’t disprove them because
    they are reported in Islamic sources and as such they are as good as
    confession. You can’t acquit a criminal after he has confessed, unless
    you plead insanity, which is my point. Muslims often ask: “Who will
    judge whether or not an attempt to disprove your accusations against
    Muhammad and Islam, was successful?”

    The readers will be the jury. It is not difficult to see which side is
    right once both arguments are presented without one side fearing the
    other. I will publish the debates in this site. My opponents are also
    encouraged to publish them in any Islamic site. Please note that I will
    not accept face to face debates.

    The debates must be in writing.

    Edit 2007/07/29

    The above challenge was issued in 2001 and it hasn’t been met yet. See
    thedebatesI had with Muslims. Also see the pathetic attempt of some
    Muslims trying torefute mehere,here,hereandhere. Is that all the Muslim
    world can offer? Where are the scholars of Islam? Why such an
    important task is left to a bunch of amateurs who actually do more
    damage to Islam? Isn’t it time that the real scholars come forth and
    refute my charges?

    The truth is that several of the people that debated me were real
    scholars, such as the eminent Pakistani scholar Mr. Javed Ahmed Ghamidi
    and his disciple Dr. Khalid Zaheer.

    This debate is a must read and is available for download.

    Dr. Zaheer is a learned man, a moderate Muslim and a good human being.

    I have utmost respect for him. As of this date (2007), I will no longer
    debate with people who want to debate anonymously. I only debate with
    reputable scholars. I made this decision because often, Muslims moved by
    their faith and zealotry, but with little knowledge of Islam, challenge
    me to debate. They rehash the same tried and refuted arguments that
    bore everyone and disappear. Then, other Muslims, either accuse me of
    fabricating those debates or pooh-pooh my opponents for not being scholars.As of this day, I am also doubling the reward.
    If you are not a reputable scholar, you can still win the prize. All
    you have to do is persuade a scholar to debate with me. If he (she)
    disproves my charges or can prove that Muhammad was a prophet of God,
    both you and he (she) will be rewarded $50,000 dollars each.
    This is to encourage you to write to your admired scholar and convince
    them that Islam is in danger and that it is their duty to defend it.
    Once you write to invite someone, please CC a copy to us for announcing
    the invitation. Our email is faithfreedom2 (at)

    Yes, Islam is in grave danger. Never, since its
    inception, Islam has faced a threat as serious as this. Today, millions
    of ex-Muslims are questioning the claimed truth of Islam, can make their
    criticisms heard worldwide, and unlike before, not fear for their
    lives. As long as these questions are not answered, this trend is only
    bound to continue, until the trickle becomes a torrent and the fall of
    Islam becomes obvious.

    In the past, the critics of Islam briefly shined like
    lamps in darkness, only to be put out by winds of persecution. What is
    happening today can be likened to the break of the dawn. Darkness has
    no chance in front of this much light.

    Muslims are waking up and leaving Islam like never before. A spiritual and intellectual revolution is underway.

    This is the century of enlightenment of the benighted Muslims.

    The giant is finally awakening.

    The days of Islam are numbered. This demon of hate and ignorance will be slain by the hands of its own primary victims.

    The unity of mankind and the world peace are around the corner.

    Please advertise this challenge. Every Muslim must see it.

    This is like throwing water on their fire. Nothing will
    dampen their zeal more than the realization that among a billion Muslims
    there is not a single scholar who can prove the wild claims of
    Muhammad, nor acquit him of these grave charges. This unmet challenge
    has a sobering effect on them.

    They can make any excuse, such as, I am not worth their
    response, that there have been greater men than me who opposed Islam, or
    that I have been refuted already, but they will not be able to fool
    themselves. The more this challenge is circulated, the more Muslims
    will be forced to remain silent and doubt Islam.

    Do not undermine the psychological effect of this impossible challenge.


    Ali Sina


    Its about time. I hope this information is honest and true no more liberal lies and liars.I know my constitution and I know it well these liberal judges in San Francisco need to be removed from the bench they up hold law they do not make or interpert law.And the law is very very clear on this point The president is well within his rights to stop any non citizen into our country (basically for any reason) our Constitutional rights do not apply to illegals or anyone not a citizen as long as they have not entered this country/These people where being prevented from entering this country and such gaining access to those very laws.


    we know we cannot trust liberal media, keep tweeting President Trump we need to be first informed not the illegals and the refugees.continue with reducing the number of refugees allowed in. I for one am tired of supporting these people. I worked for 50 years for my extremely limited SS benefits because our over paid congress was stealing our (my) money to support their very liberal programs supporting those who had never worked a day in this country and didn’t plan on working.

  • Richard Trundle


  • Richard Trundle


  • A-Jay
  • Dee

    That’s exactly right ! I hope Sessions does take them off the bench , at least the first judge in Washington state . To go against the
    Law and play politics is So dangerous to Our Country .
    If they move forward and take that judge down it will send a message to all out there who think it’s ok to betray the oath they took .

  • USARetired

    Where is the line between controversy and sedition? The left in this Nation is out of control and must be put down!!

  • johninnil

    This judge isn’t interested in the law. He’s interested in forwarding his liberal agenda from the bench. That is wrong.

  • Tiger

    I put out so many articles showing the laws, showing the place the court has, showing how Thomas Jefferson feared this, myself and others over and over and this has to stop. They are unruly and totally out of their place in our Branches of government.

    Yes it is going to take some removing on the legal grounds we have to do it. But just like the Liberals in America believe nothing that O has done, even up in their face with video, they will construe this as Trump being a Dictator. The Main Media will go that route and we are equally divided so I don’t see this going anywhere but bad.

  • Victor Sgringer

    I would advise President Trump to just rewhite the Immigration Ban order again, and keep it within the
    1952 Immigration and Nationallity Act. If the Government employee fail to perform their duties under
    this President, then they should be fired. As far as the White House staff leaking information tothe
    New Media, find out who is doiing so and Fire them as well. The President is doing what the Voters sent
    him to Washington to do; It is the first time that his has happened in a very long time Let him to
    his job.

  • Victor Sgringer

    I would also, suggest that all the protesters who are crying “LET THEM IN”, be required
    to house them at their expence for as long as it takes for them to become Citizens of this country,
    It is time for the United States, to stop paying for the Illegals who enter this country. They
    should be paying to stay, not the other way around;! Why should we be paying them to
    break the Law. Every Governor or Major of an American State or City, should be held
    in Contempt for not following the Federal Guile Lines on the Immigration Laws in America

  • ErnieLane

    Any news stories about this talk about the “Muslim majority nation” the order applies to. Does that mean we should expect, for example, if the President makes a deal with Mexico, news stories about it will refer the “Christian-majority Mexico”?

  • Tiger
  • Wanda Wyatt

    I only listen to Twitter. I no longer trust the liberal bias yellow journalism news media.

  • bill_v523

    those who love the “religion of peace” should move to the islamic country of their choice and smell feets and butts daily and never return

  • bill_v523

    hang them for high treason on Pennsylvania avenue at high noon

  • bill_v523

    McCain should have rotted in a rice paddy – he is a Fascist Pig

  • bill_v523

    because BOzo’s koran wouldn’t allow BOzo to do so

  • bill_v523

    hope its “dead or alive” preferably dead

  • bill_v523

    San Fran-sicko needs to be removed from the continent

  • bill_v523

    PROUD INFIDEL says nuke religio-fantasy islamania out of existence, take out the bodies and so go the minds that are deluded by islam

  • bill_v523

    different whores

  • bill_v523

    mental illness is the only way someone can believe in islam

  • Peter Joffe

    I do not normally watch CNN but on Sunday they were interviewing some Democrat asshole senator about how the Trump Travel Restrictions will assist ISIS in recruiting Jihadists? Now this makes real sense to me as ISIS has sworn to kill us, rape our wives and daughters and install Sharia in place of our Constitution. According to the brain damaged senator we are to agree to all that ISIS has to say, not dare to criticize anything otherwise we are in danger of annoying them and then they will, kill us, rape our wives and daughters and install Sharia Law into the country?? Best to just sit back and allow ISLAM to take over America and the world as we simply cannot annoy our future masters and killers? In fact according to Liberals and Demo-deplorables we need to open our boarders and allow more Muslim Immigrants in and don’t vet them as we may find that there are some more Jihadists among them who may also get annoyed that we tried to stop them for killing us, raping our wives and daughters and installing Sharia in our once peaceful county. NO to Trump and his immigration policies as it will be better to get this over sooner rather than later? Lets have an Islam Caliphate by the end of this decade rather than never if Trump has anything to do with it??? Ask the Democrats like Clinton and you will find that Islam now is not soon enough for them and their Politically Correct mania.

  • Tiger

    He is worse than that.

  • Martha Bartha

    Allah Akbar!?

  • bill_v523

    are you clearing your throat of someones foot or a** from the noon call BS? (oh and fk allah)

  • Martha Bartha

    Must pray 5 times a day bent over.?

  • bill_v523


  • Martha Bartha

    That’s why they have to keep the women from praying separate?. Too tempting.

  • tes d’aless

    eff the media! my safety is worth it – can’t believe the haters who don’t think it is