Accuracy in Media

President Obama’s assertion that the Islamic State was a “JV” team demonstrates how he arrogantly ignored the possibility that this jihadist terror group could eventually threaten the United States. But what the press will not report is that President Obama is at least partially responsible for the arming of ISIS.

A recent article by Jerome Corsi of WorldNetDaily sheds further light on how former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama worked to actively arm Syrian rebels, ultimately supporting groups that would coalesce into the Islamic State.

“…[I]t’s become increasingly clear that President Obama and his secretary of state at the time, Hillary Clinton in 2011, armed the Free Syrian Army rebels in an effort to topple the regime of Bashar al-Assad, mirroring a strategy already under way in Libya to help al-Qaida-affiliated militia overthrow Moammar Gadhafi,” writes Corsi. “A consequence of the strategy was the emergence of ISIS out of the loosely coordinated Free Syrian Army coalition as well as the disastrous Benghazi attack in which a U.S. ambassador was murdered.”

In other words, Mrs. Clinton and Obama are at least partially responsible for the current Middle East chaos, the death of four brave Americans at the hands of terrorists in Benghazi, and Islamic State-inspired homegrown terrorism. In Syria, the civil war has cost 470,000 lives as of last February, according to The New York Times, a half million by most estimates today. But don’t look to the Times or other news organizations to blame President Obama or former presidential candidate Clinton for the death toll.

Corsi cites the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi, which came to a similar conclusion in our 2016 Benghazi report, which is entitled “Betrayal in Benghazi: A Dereliction of Duty.” “It is notable, however, that [Syrian Free Army] statements from the 2012 time period complained that they were not receiving any missiles,” states our report, continuing, “it now appears that at least some of the recipients instead were jihadist units that would eventually coalesce into the Islamic State.”

Our 2014 interim report revealed that the Obama administration had switched sides in the War on Terror by arming al-Qaeda-linked rebels in Libya in a successful bid to overthrow our counterterrorism ally Muammar Qaddafi. The Obama administration, in its zeal to arm the rebels, even stymied truce talks that could have led to a peaceful transition.

And, as we wrote in our 2016 report, Ambassador Chris Stevens, then “U.S. envoy,” coordinated his efforts with Abdelhakim Belhadj, despite the latter’s connections to al-Qaeda.

“The [2014 CCB] report asserted the agenda of al-Qaida-affiliated jihadis in the region, including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and other Islamic terror groups represented among the rebel forces, was well known to U.S. officials responsible for Libya policy,” reports Corsi in his recent article.

Corsi notes that there was considerable lobbying to convince Washington that the Free Syrian Army (FSA) was a “moderate group.” This, he writes, was “despite clear evidence the al-Nusra Front—operating under the FSA umbrella—had been declared a terrorist organization by the State Department; had pledged allegiance to al-Qaida’s top leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri; and was the group of choice for foreign jihadi fighters pouring into Syria.” But there are still those who believe that the U.S. could have actually worked with the FSA and coalesced an effective fighting force around them, dramatically changing the course of history in that region. We’ll never know for sure.

The Obama administration engaged in regime change policies in both Syria and Libya despite the fact that such efforts would likely lead to more violence and chaos in the region. Corsi notes that the Obama administration even armed Ansar al Sharia, which was responsible for the September 11, 2012 Benghazi terror attacks.

The Obama administration has repeatedly sided with the enemies of America, from arming al-Qaeda-linked rebels abroad, to making political commitments with and providing sanctions relief for the totalitarian regime of Iran. This has been a great betrayal of American values and puts American citizens in harm’s way.

Several opinion journalists on the left have come around to acknowledging the disastrous role that the Obama administration has played in the region, particularly in Syria. As we previously reported, Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times called Syria Obama’s “worst mistake.”

Richard Cohen wrote in The Washington Post that Obama “has been all too happy to preside over the loss of American influence. Aleppo, Syria, now a pile of rubble, is where countless died—as did American influence.”

Leon Wieseltier of the Brookings Institution and formerly of The New Republic offered the harshest criticism: “As a direct or indirect consequence of our refusal to respond forcefully to the Syrian crisis, we have beheld secular tyranny, religious tyranny, genocide, chemical warfare, barrel bombs and cluster bombs, the torture and murder of children, the displacement of 11 million people, the destabilization of Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, the ascendancy of Iran in the region, the emergence of Russia as a global power, the diminishment of the American position in the world, the refugee crisis in Europe, the resurgence of fascism in Europe and a significant new threat to the security of the United States. It is amazing how much doing nothing can do, especially when it is we who do nothing.”

Secretary of State John Kerry claimed at a press briefing on Thursday that Obama’s decision not to take action after the Syrians had crossed his stated “red line” by using chemical weapons, was the right move and succeeded because the result was that all of the chemical weapons were removed from Syria without dropping a bomb. Few are buying that argument, as chemical weapons were used again in Aleppo before it fell recently to the Syrian regime, or as Russia and Syria view it, was liberated from the various terrorist groups that held its civilians as human shields in a no-win situation.




Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.

Comments

  • Frank de Varona

    There needs to be a REAL investigation on the actions of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton before, during, and after the civil war in Libya. It is clear to me that Obama and Hillary Clinton committed treason, dereliction of duty and criminal negligence in Libya and Syria. Using information from the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi, Judicial Watch, WND, and other sources, I wrote several chapters on Libya and the Middle Eastern gunrunning operation directed by Obama (who is responsible for the rise of the Islamic State) in my book, OBAMA, HILLARY CLINTON AND RADICAL ISLAM (2016). My book has 632 pages and many pictures and it is available on Amazon books. My congratulations on another great article by Roger Aronoff. He is a great patriot and one of my heroes! Frank de Varona

  • Ted

    Who cares about this? One can’t retract the water that’s already gone over the dam … and this guy’s gone for good, too, in 14 days!

    Although … constantly ragging on and ragging on and ragging on the water that’s already gone over the dam is definitely the GOP way! (Gingrich, the radioheads, and the teabaggers are absolute masters at it!)

  • Init4thecache

    @ Ted – You sound like Hillary on the Benghazi massacre: “What diffence does it make?” And Obama is far from ending his destruction of America just because he’s out of the WH. Regarding the “ragging” – these issues need investigation so, hopefully, we will not relive this sad piece of our history; and to determine if this apparent supporter of our sworn enemies should be tried and punished for treason.

  • David

    Leon Wieseltier of the Brookings Institution and formerly of The New Republic offered the harshest criticism:
    “As a direct or indirect consequence of our refusal to respond
    forcefully to the Syrian crisis, we have beheld secular tyranny,
    religious tyranny, genocide, chemical warfare, barrel bombs and cluster
    bombs, the torture and murder of children, the displacement of 11
    million people, the destabilization of Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, the
    ascendancy of Iran in the region, the emergence of Russia as a global
    power, the diminishment of the American position in the world, the
    refugee crisis in Europe, the resurgence of fascism in Europe and a
    significant new threat to the security of the United States. It is
    amazing how much doing nothing can do, especially when it is we who do
    nothing.”

    How can this disingenuous LIBERAL sit there with a straight face and say we did “NOTHING”? He needs to take his head out of his @$$ and read the rest of this article to see how much more than NOTHING we actually did in the region! Unless he means “NOTHING GOOD.” Nah, he’s just another liberal hack trying to help spin the history of America’s WORST White House Resident into something nicer.

    You can’t put lipstick on a pig and you can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear! YOUR GUY SCREWED UP!!! OWN IT!!!

  • David

    Please do not feed the trolls (people like Ted). He obviously has nothing bewtter to do than to come to a conservative site and pick a fight.

    And somehow, I don’t think Obozo will ever be “gone.”

  • TPS12

    Is this one of his success stories? He definitely claims he had no scandals.

  • D.G. Williams

    I care because Obama and HRC will not go away. They will continue to act as saboteurs to harm the new administration and cause chaos. They are active at this very moment.

  • Obama and Clinton are clueless on how to fix anything. They think they are the smartest people in the world and listen to know one and do what they see is right. Both are serial liars, incompetent and clueless.

  • Ted

    Jerome Corsi??? Now, there’s a real journalist for you!

    On the other hand, Aronoff, what percentage of American people do you think REALLY CARE about the goings on in Syria? 1%? Maybe 2%?

    All the hostility in the Muslim middle east towards the U.S. is the direct result of the doings of the invasions in the area engineered by warmonger Cheney and moron Bush. Anything else is just peanuts by comparison.

  • AndRebecca

    You do have it right. The people in the M.E. are against Bush and Cheney and they are for their friends Obama and Hillary. ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran never had it so good. Only Christians and Jews have anything to fear out of Obama and Hillary.