Accuracy in Media
Curvy Graphic

    

Obama’s International Socialist Connections


AIM Column  |  By Cliff Kincaid  |  February 14, 2008


The socialist connections of Obama and the Democratic Party have certainly not been featured in the Washington Post columns of Harold Meyerson, who happens not only to be a member but a vice-chair of the DSA.

Campaign workers for Senator and presidential candidate Barack Obama are under fire for displaying a flag featuring communist hero Che Guevara. But Obama has his own controversial socialist connections. He is, in fact, an associate of a Chicago-based Marxist group with access to millions of labor union dollars and connections to expert political consultants, including a convicted swindler.   

Obama's socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat.  Later, the Chicago DSA newsletter reported that Obama, as a state senator, showed up to eulogize Saul Mendelson, one of the "champions" of "Chicago's democratic left" and a long-time socialist activist. Obama's stint as a "community organizer" in Chicago has gotten some attention, but his relationship with the DSA socialists, who groomed and backed him, has been generally ignored.     

Blogger Steve Bartin, who has been following Obama's career and involvement with the Chicago socialists, has uncovered a fascinating video showing Obama campaigning for openly socialist Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Interestingly, Sanders, who won his seat in 2006, called Obama "one of the great leaders of the United States Senate," even though Obama had only been in the body for about two years. In 2007, the National Journal said that Obama had established himself as "the most liberal Senator." More liberal than Sanders? That is quite a feat. Does this make Obama a socialist, too?  

DSA describes itself as the largest socialist organization in the United States and the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International. The Socialist International (SI) has what is called "consultative status" with the United Nations. In other words, it works hand-in-glove with the world body.  

The international connection is important and significant because an Obama bill, "The Global Poverty Act," has just been rushed through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, with the assistance of Democratic Senator Joe Biden, the chairman, and Republican Senator Richard Lugar. The legislation (S.2433) commits the U.S. to spending hundreds of billions of dollars more in foreign aid on the rest of the world, in order to comply with the "Millennium Goals" established by the United Nations. Conservative members of the committee were largely caught off-guard by the move to pass the Obama bill but are putting a  "hold" on it, in order to try to prevent the legislation, which also quickly passed the House, from being quickly brought up for a full Senate vote. But observers think that Senate Democrats may try to pass it quickly anyway, in order to give Obama a precious legislative "victory" that he could run on.     

Another group associated with the SI is the Party of European Socialists (PES), which heard from Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, back in 2006. Dean's speech is posted on the official Democratic Party website, although the European socialist parties are referred to as "progressive." Democrats, Dean said, want to be "good citizens of the world community." He spoke at a session on "Global Challenges for Progressive Politics."  

Following up, in April 2007, PES President Poul Nyrup Rasmussen reported that European socialists held a meeting "in the Democrats HQ in Washington," met with officials of the party and Democratic members of Congress, and agreed that "PES activist groups" in various U.S. cities would start working together. The photos of the trip show Rasmussen meeting with such figures as Senator Ben Cardin, Senator Bernie Sanders, officials of the Brookings Institution, Howard Dean, and AFL-CIO President John W. Sweeney, a member of the DSA. The Brookings Institution is headed by former Clinton State Department official Strobe Talbott, a proponent of world government who was recently identified in the book Comrade J as having been a pawn of the Russian intelligence service.  

The socialist connections of Obama and the Democratic Party have certainly not been featured in the Washington Post columns of Harold Meyerson, who happens not only to be a member but a vice-chair of the DSA. Meyerson, the subject of our 2005 column, "A Socialist at the Washington Post," has praised convicted inside-trader George Soros for manipulating campaign finance laws to benefit the far-left elements of the Democratic Party. Obama's success in the Democratic presidential primaries and caucuses is further evidence of Soros's success. Indeed, Soros has financially contributed to the Obama campaign. 

It is not surprising that the Chicago Democrat, Rep. Jan Schakowsky, has endorsed Obama. Schakowsky, who endorsed Howard Dean for president in 2004, was honored in 2000 at a dinner sponsored by the Chicago chapter of the DSA. Her husband, Robert Creamer, emerged from federal prison in November 2006 after serving five months for financial crimes. He pleaded guilty to ripping off financial institutions while running a non-profit group.  Before he was convicted but under indictment, Creamer was hired by the Soros-funded Open Society Policy Center to sabotage John Bolton's nomination as Ambassador to the U.N.  

After his release from prison, Creamer released a book, Listen to Your Mother: Stand up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, described by one blogger as the book that was "penned in the pen." A blurb for the book declares, "Some people think that in order to win, Democrats need to move to the political center by adopting conservative values and splitting the difference between progressive and conservative positions. History shows they are wrong. To win the next election and to win in the long term, we need to redefine the political center." 

In addition to writing the book, Creamer is back in business, running his firm, Strategic Consulting Group, and advertising himself as "a consultant to the campaigns to end the war in Iraq, pass universal health care, change America's budget priorities and enact comprehensive immigration reform." His clients have included the AFL-CIO and MoveOn.org. In fact, his client list is a virtual who's who of the Democratic Party, organized labor, and Democratic Party constituency groups.  

Creamer's list of testimonials comes from such figures as Democratic Senators Dick Durbin (Ill.) and Sherrod Brown (Ohio), Harold Meyerson, MoveOn.org founder Wes Boyd, and David Axelrod, a "Democratic political consultant."  

Axelrod, of course, is much more than just a "Democratic political consultant." He helped State Senator Barack Obama win his U.S. Senate seat in 2004 and currently serves as strategist and media advisor to Obama's presidential campaign.


Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of the AIM Report and can be reached at


Comments 5 Comments  |  Post a Comment


skabud
April 23  at  1:06 pm  |  #1  |  Link

http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?sid=3275
http://www.akpmedia.com/partners/daxelrod.html

they are selling a bag of real dangerous #### to stupid overweight infantile creatures of a shopping-mall-regime

Axelrod’s strategy has been to promote a personality, not issues. Perhaps this is why Obama’s campaign speeches have been more like Saturday Night Live Matt Foley motivational speeches than serious attempts to lay out what an Obama presidency would mean to our nation. Massachusetts voters are learning the folly of voting for a personality rather than sound policies and a plan. (This isn’t to discount the importance of character or personality in a political candidate, but the candidate should state what he’s going to do when elected – not simply give motivational speeches.)

SKA
April 26  at  1:15 am  |  #2  |  Link

While I am a supporter of socialist politics, it disgusts me that these issues are not talked about in public. The media focuses only on “personality”, and the likability of a candidate and not on important issues at hand. Our political system is designed to be a selection process and not an election. Even though Obama has ‘socialist’ connections in the past, to be able to be where he is in the current system, he’s been totally compromised to be begin with, he will not be working for anyone but the rich.

Pat
May 2  at  11:12 am  |  #3  |  Link

Asking the right questions can sometimes yield the right answers, and few seems to be questioning the degree to which any of the candidates have socialist leanings, or who are disguised communists through socialist rhetoric.

Because American democracy has fundamental values like equality for everyone, it may be that democracy itself may be socialistic but limit itself to promising more. Capitalism is not socialism only because it is rooted in economics, not political theology.

That America may have socialist political philosophy and capitalism as its economic philosophy is a distinct probability that has never been taught well, but which seems to reveal itself in our progressive attitudes and actions.

Playing to that socialist sentiment of “all-included” mentality, it’s possible that America has allowed the premise of economic socialism (a.k.a., Communism) to creep into its national identity through programs like affirmative action and through the economic focus of civil rights, etc. that sees the welfare state as the economic source of serenity - perhaps unfairly.

Where socialist economic has been indulged, can communism be far behind?

Identifying candidates by separating their political philosophy from their economic philosophy might be the necessary agenda to arrive at what Americans really think, and how to choose its electorate, as well as its Presidents, to find out who’s who in America.

David
May 30  at  11:29 am  |  #4  |  Link

Socialism says that your rights and responsibilities come from and are ordered by government.  It is the ideology of coercion.  It goes against what this nation stands for.  It goes against individual liberty and freedom.

Our government does not give us our rights, it protects our rights.  It does not give us privileges either, it protects our rights.  With rights come responsibility.  One cannot infringe on someone else’s rights.  People need to learn this, and our socialist public school systems have failed to teach this.  We talk about “how driving is a privilege,” which makes it sound like government gives us our rights.  We are misleading our children into thinking like socialists.

obamer
June 8  at  10:37 am  |  #5  |  Link

A brief History of Barack Hussein Obama the Racist

IS HE FOR A BLACK PLANET?

http://www.blackplanet.com/barack_Obama/

ENDORSEMENT FROM THE BLACK PANTHERS

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/03/new_black_panth.html

http://wakeupblackamerica.blogspot.com/2008/04/new-black-panthers-support-barack-obama.html

BARACK AND THE NAACP FOR FREEDOM OR DOMINATION

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/050502-remarks_of_senator_barack_obam/

OBAMAS RACIST CHURCH Read down to the 10 points - Committed to liberation? Africa, ECONOMIC PARITY?

http://www.tucc.org/about.htm

MEMBER OF INTERNATIONAL MARXIST GROUP OF SOCIALISTS

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-international-socialist-connections/

Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Support AIM
Join AIM

Red Line
Email Signup
*  Email:
    Zip:

*  Code shown:
(without spaces)