Accuracy in Media

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt announced Monday the Trump administration planned to take formal steps to repeal a key environmental regulation that was designed to put coal plants out of business. Upon reporting, though, the mainstream media’s response was not about the shortcomings of the plan itself.

It was not about the 28 states’ attorneys general who have sued to block it or the judicial ruling that they were likely to prevail and thus implementation would be halted. It was not about the devastation in coal country caused by the previous administration’s attempts to put it out of business. And it certainly was not about how the U.S. would otherwise come up with the 40 percent of our electricity that coal fuels.

Instead, it focused on President Trump erasing the legacy of President Obama – of Trump going through the book and eliminating every regulation Obama implemented solely to excise his name from the Federal Register.

“The Trump administration announced on Monday that it would take formal steps to repeal President Barack Obama’s signature policy to curb greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, setting up a bitter fight over the future of America’s efforts to tackle global warming,” the New York Times reported.

USA Today wrote that carbon emissions lead to significant global warming. “The Trump administration’s move to start dismantling the Clean Power Plan rule intended to curb carbon emissions that contribute to global warming will not be a quick process,” it wrote. Pruitt’s statement “rolling back the Obama-era rule is simply the first of a number of steps the agency will have to take.”

“The Trump administration’s move to start dismantling the Clean Power Plan rule intended to curb carbon emissions that contribute to global warming will not be a quick process,” it wrote. Pruitt’s statement “rolling back the Obama-era rule is simply the first of a number of steps the agency will have to take.”

At issue in the debate over climate change is how much carbon has to do with climate. Models that gave increased carbon in the air an outsized impact on weather changes – such as serial data torturer Michael Mann’s infamous hockey stick – have not stood the test of time.

CNN thought it was so important readers know this was an Obama regulation it mentioned it twice. “Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt announced Monday his agency’s plan to withdraw the Clean Power plan, the sweeping Obama-era rule regulating greenhouse gas emissions,” it wrote. “While speaking in Kentucky at an event with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Pruitt said he will sign the proposed rule repealing Obama’s plan Tuesday.”

“Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt announced Monday his agency’s plan to withdraw the Clean Power plan, the sweeping Obama-era rule regulating greenhouse gas emissions,” it wrote. “While speaking in Kentucky at an event with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Pruitt said he will sign the proposed rule repealing Obama’s plan Tuesday.”

The New York Times could not let it go.

“The repeal proposal, which will be filed in the Federal Register on Tuesday, fulfills a promise President Trump made to eradicate his predecessor’s environmental legacy.”

Trump promised to remove or repeal costly regulations and said eliminating this regulation would save American businesses $33 billion. It also rejected the Obama figures on asthma deaths and attacks.

Under the Clean Power Plan, the U.S. would meet its targets under the Paris climate accord – the regulation was central to us being able to sign – by setting goals for each state based on what is feasible and cost-effective.

Previously, it had set emissions targets for individual plants in which the plants themselves could take steps to meet the targets at their own facilities. Under the Clean Power Plan, the target could be met statewide by curbing coal power and replacing it with alternative energy, such as wind. Courts already have ruled power companies could not be forced to replace coal with wind power in this way. The attorneys general whose injunction now keeps the rule in abeyance are suing on grounds the Clean Air Act does not authorize establishing statewide emissions limits.

This is just part of the Trump administration’s rejection of climate change. It has scrubbed it from the EPA and other government websites, withdrawn the country from the Paris climate accord and its U.N. delegation from a variety of panels that deal with the issue.

The New York Times quotes Jody Freeman, director of the environmental law program at Harvard Law, as saying the action shows the Trump administration is putting its thumb on the scale in favor of fossil fuels.

“You see a pretty powerful message,” she said. “Disavow any effort to control greenhouse gases in the power sector, and instead, intervene in the market to promote coal. It’s a wow.”





Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.

Comments

  • John Cunningham

    The Cat’s out of the bag and, what are they going to loose. The People of this Country that at least seem to be paying attention, know by now that the Mainstream Media is out to get Donald Trump no matter what. The Liberals will believe anything they are fed, they act just like the German People while Hitler was taking over the Government.

    It no longer seems to mind who knows what’s going on in this Country. I guess they, along with Hollywood, believe if you just keep telling lies, People will finally believe it. Now, even people who are Democrats, are starting to see the truth. I feel we are in a socially enhanced civil war that has the whole World at the feet of what happens.

  • john robel

    GO TRUMP, GO LIKE HELL, I CAN’T STAND THE OBAMA SMELL.

  • grnjllybn

    The so-called main stream media is just a bunch of evil bastards
    who are only grabbing at whatever garbage they can throw at
    our “duly elected President”. They should drop dead and take
    obongo with them!! I’ve had it with the stinking liars.

  • jug

    They are not democrats!

    They ARE Commiecrats!

  • John Cunningham

    AMEN!

  • TPS12

    msm just not interested in the truth only hate and bias.

  • Richard Schmidt

    If undoing Obama’s unconstitutional usurpation of political power is “spite”…..i call for more spite.

  • sox83cubs84

    And he probably does smell…don’t many Muslime men use their hands to wipe themselves after going #2?

  • Paul Anderson Ed.D.

    In spite of Obama’s dirty dealings against the president: Eliminating many if not all of Obama’s programs, only helps to improve a nation, which had been in moral and economic decline.

  • missieb2000

    The NYT has ‘gatekeepers’ bragging about censorship and helping political parties inspite of their guidelines. What would you expect from them?

  • PoliticalBrew

    According to Professor Wallace Broecker (the originator of the term Global Warming) there have been 11 climate cycles in the geological record. He begs the question; if man is causing this climate cycle who caused all the others? His theory (30 second video) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0aTlyQuvDv3U1Brc0h1WFQxWm8/view?usp=drivesdk is my belief as an Atmospheric Chemist and Chemical Oceanographer who studied at Broecker’s lab.

    Dr. Don Easterbrook of W. WA University presents the most comprehensive refutation of unproven alarmist suppositions that I’m aware of.

    https://youtu.be/8BKBzc8vJtQ

  • Peter

    The verbal diarrhoea from the MEANstream media, mixed with the bullshit from when Obama’s lips move, emits methane, another greenhouse gas. The solution for this is for the MEANstream media to STFU. When Obama sneezes he breaks wind into his own hands. The mainstream media is then promptly there to scoop it up. Obama holds the mainstream media in his hand. They regurgitate every word he ever spat from that orifice he calls a mouth. And Ultra Fresh saves the day.

  • NonPCconservative

    If California can pass a law forbidding people from using the correct pronouns when referring to those with gender dysphoria why can’t we have a federal law forcing all climate change scaremongers to stop using the misleading “parts per million”? Make them say 0.04% and make sure that they add that the the anthropogenic contribution that is only 4% which means only 0.0016%.

  • John Cunningham

    They are evil beings!

  • TED

    Trump is as wacky … and as dangerous … as the weirdo in North Korea … and whatever Mueller and the media can do to help contain Trump will be greatly appreciated by the majority of informed and thinking Americans. Trump is a travesty in process and is another minority president, like Bush II, whose ignorance is doing irreparable harm to this county.

  • Desertphile

    Gosh, how dare the conservative media state a demonstrable fact?! How dare they state a “narrative” that is factual?! Who the bloody hell do the conservative media think they are anyways, stating the truth?!? Damn them! Damn them conservatives to stating what everyone sees is true!

  • Desertphile

    “:According to Professor Wallace Broecker (the originator of the term Global Warming)….”

    Er, “global warming” was coined in the year 1823. Human-caused climate change was already an issue when Abraham Lincoln was president. Sheeeish. Time for you to grow up now.

  • Desertphile

    “In spite of Obama’s dirty dealings against the president”

    Please provide an example. Thank you.

  • Desertphile

    ” Michael Mann’s infamous hockey stick – have not stood the test of time.”

    … except all of the world’s geophysicists have stated the opposite. Oops! How do you explain this fact?

    Meanwhile, there are now more than 40 independent “hockey sticks,” derived independently using independent methodologies— and they all show the same sharp and anomalous increase in global temperature. Gosh. Why does this fact upset you fascist lunatics?

    A partial list of independently derived ‘hockey sticks,’ compiled by Jim Milks.

    Crowley 2000: Used both his own and Mann et al. (1999)’s hockey sticks to examine the cause of temperature changes over the past 1,000 years. Found that natural forcings could not explain twentieth century warming without the effect of greenhouse gases.

    Huang, et al. 2000: Reconstructed global average temperatures since AD 1500 using temperature data from 616 boreholes from around the globe.

    Bertrand et al. 2002: Reconstructed solar output, volcanic activity, land use changes, and greenhouse gas concentrations since AD 1000, then computed the expected temperature changes due to those forcings. Compared the computed temperature changes with two independent temperature reconstructions.

    Esper et al. 2002: Reconstructed Northern Hemisphere temperatures between AD 800 and AD 2000 using tree ring chronologies.

    Cronin et al. 2003: Reconstructed temperatures between 200 BC and AD 2000 around Chesapeake Bay, USA, using sediment core records.

    Pollack and Smerdon 2004: Reconstructed global average temperatures since AD 1500 using temperature data from 695 boreholes from around the globe.

    Esper et al. 2005: Compared and averaged five independent reconstructions of Northern Hemisphere temperatures from AD 1000 to AD 2000.

    Moberg et al. 2005: Combined tree ring proxies with glacial ice cores, stalagmite, and lake sediment proxies to reconstruct Northern Hemisphere temperatures from AD 1 to AD 2000.

    Oerlemans 2005: Reconstructed global temperatures from AD 1500 to AD 2000 using 169 glacial ice proxies from around the globe. Rutherford, et al. 2005: Compared two multi-proxy temperature reconstructions and tested the results of each reconstruction for sensitivity to type of statistics used, proxy characteristics, seasonal variation, and geographic location. Concluded that the reconstructions were robust to various sources of error.

    D’Arrigo et al. 2006: Reconstructed Northern Hemisphere temperatures between AD 700 and AD 2000 from multiple tree ring proxies using a new statistical technique called Regional Curve Standardization. Concluded that their new technique was superior to the older technique used by previous reconstructions.

    Osborn and Briffa 2006: Used 14 regional temperature reconstructions between AD 800 and AD 2000 to compare spatial extent of changes in Northern Hemisphere temperatures. Found that twentieth century warming was more widespread than any other temperature change of the past 1,200 years.

    Hegerl et al. 2007: Combined borehole temperatures and tree ring proxies to reconstruct Northern Hemisphere temperatures over the past 1,450 years. Introduced a new calibration technique between proxy temperatures and instrumental temperatures.

    Juckes et al. 2007: Combined multiple older reconstructions into a meta-analysis. Also used existing proxies to calculate a new Northern Hemisphere temperature reconstruction.

    Wahl and Ammann 2007: Used the tree ring proxies, glacial proxies, and borehole proxies used by Mann et al. (1998, 1999) to recalculate Northern Hemisphere temperatures since AD 800. Refuted the McIntyre and McKitrick criticisms and showed that those criticisms were based on flawed statistical techniques.

    Wilson, et al. 2007: Reconstructed Northern Hemisphere temperatures from AD 1750 to AD 2000 using tree ring proxies that did not show a divergence problem after AD 1960.

    Mann et al. 2008: Reconstructed global temperatures between AD 200 and AD 2000 using 1,209 independent proxies ranging from tree rings to boreholes to sediment cores to stalagmite cores to Greenland and Antarctic ice cores.

    Kaufman, et al. 2009: Used tree rings, lake sediment cores, and glacial ice cores to reconstruct Arctic temperatures between 1 BC and 2000 AD.

    von Storch et al. 2009: Tested three different temperature reconstruction techniques to show that the Composite plus Scaling method was better than the other two methods.

    Frank et al. 2010: A brief history of proxy temperature reconstructions, as well as analysis of the main questions remaining in temperature reconstructions.

    Kellerhals et al. 2010: Used ammonium concentration in a glacial ice core to reconstruct tropical South American temperatures over the past 1,600 years.

    Ljungqvist 2010: Reconstructed extra-tropical Northern Hemisphere temperatures from AD 1 to AD 2000 using historical records, sediment cores, tree rings, and stalagmites.

    Thibodeau et al. 2010: Reconstructed temperatures at the bottom of the Gulf of St. Lawrence since AD 1000 via sediment cores.

    Tingley and Huybers 2010a, 2010b: Used a Bayesian approach to reconstruct North American temperatures.

    Büntgen et al. 2011: Used tree ring proxies to reconstruct Central European temperatures between 500 BC and AD 2000.

    Kemp et al. 2011: Reconstructed sea levels off North Carolina, USA from 100 BC to AD 2000 using sediment cores. They also showed that sea levels changed with global temperature for at least the past millennium.

    Kinnard et al. 2011: Used multiple proxies to reconstruct late summer Arctic sea ice between AD 561 and AD 1995, using instrumental data to extend their record to AD 2000.

    Martin-Chivelet et al. 2011: Reconstructed temperatures in the Iberian Peninsula from 2000 BC to AD 2000 using stalagmites. Spielhagen et al. 2011: Reconstructed marine temperatures in the Fram Strait from 100 BC to AD 2000 using sediment cores.

  • Desertphile

    Oh noes! More hockey sticks!

    Esper et al. 2012: Used tree ring proxies to reconstruct Northern Scandinavian temperatures 100 BC to AD 2000. May have solved the post-AD 1960 tree ring divergence problem.

    Ljungqvist et al. 2012: Used a network of 120 tree ring proxies, ice core proxies, pollen records, sediment cores, and historical documents to reconstruct Northern Hemisphere temperatures between AD 800 and AD 2000, with emphasis on proxies recording the Medieval Warm Period.

    Melvin et al. 2012: Reanalyzed tree ring data for the Torneträsk region of northern Sweden.

    Abram et al. 2013: Reconstructed snow melt records and temperatures in the Antarctic Peninsula since AD 1000 using ice core records.

    Marcott, et al. 2013: Reconstructed global temperatures over the past 11,000 years using sediment cores. Data ended at AD 1940.

    PAGES 2k Consortium 2013: Used multiple proxies (tree rings, sediment cores, ice cores, stalagmites, pollen, etc) to reconstruct regional and global temperatures since AD 1.

    Rhodes et al. 2013: Used proxy and instrumental records to reconstruct global temperatures from AD 1753 to AD 2011.

    Y Zhang et al. 2014: “Millennial minimum temperature variations in the Qilian Mountains, China: evidence from tree rings,” Climate of the Past, 10, 1763–1778, 2014.

    Shi et al. 2015: “A multi-proxy reconstruction of spatial and temporal variations in Asian summer temperatures over the last millennium,” Climate Change, August 2015, Volume 131, Issue 4, pp 663-676.

  • Desertphile

    Oh hoes again! Humans are the cause! Gosh, looks like you will just have to man up and accept the evidence.

    Allow me to share a relatively short list of things that point strongly to human induced climate change:

    1. Observations from all over the globe directly measure significant increases in CO2 and CH4 concentrations.

    2. Water Vapor, Methane, Nitrous Oxide, and Carbon Dioxide, despite making up only 1% of the atmosphere, make the difference between the earth being an uninhabitable ice ball and it being a living breathing planet. (a 60 degree F difference!). In other words, a little bit can do a lot.

    3. Carbon Isotopes prove the CO2 increase is due to the burning of fossil fuels, and not some natural occurrence.

    4. Global temperatures are increasing in a stair step manner, which is consistent with an external force being imposed on a cyclical (sinusoidal like) climate system. No climate scientist worth their salt ever expected a linear increase in global temperature.

    5. Record high max temps as well as record high min temps are outpacing record low temps and record low max temps by a wide margin.

    6. The troposphere is warming while the stratosphere is cooling. If it were the sun, both would behave in a similar fashion and both would be cooling.

    7. Outgoing long wave radiation from the earth is decreasing, and is emanating from a higher and higher altitude.

    8. Arctic sea ice is at an all-time low for this time of year, and the “melting season” is just beginning.

    9. All global temperature data sets, including the satellite record, recorded February of 2016 as the warmest month ever by a wide margin. And by the way, the satellite record has required more revisions than any other temperature dataset out there. Since 1979, numerous revisions/corrections have changed the trend of the graph from cooling to slight cooling to no trend to slight warming to warming. It is not the messianic source of thermal measurement that some claim it to be.

    10. Ocean acidification is having significant impacts on the ocean’s ecosystem.

    11. Sea level is rising demonstrably.

    Now, if someone can scientifically show that all of the above is irrelevant and/or wrong, I’m all ears. But if you can’t prove zero risk, we by definition have entered the world of risk assessment. And the argument that it will cripple our economy is unadulterated hogwash. There are an abundant number of economic opportunities just waiting to be claimed. There are answers that will appease both political parties. There are answers that will appease both green and non-green advocates. There are answers that will make our society bidirectional, both left and right. Let’s stop arguing, and do some creative collaboration. When John Kennedy issued the charge of going to the moon by the end of the decade, no one had a clue how to do it. We figured it out with 6 months to spare. China gets it. In 30 years, they want to be selling clean energy to the U.S. instead of buying it from us. Even if you’re not “green”, do you really want to look back in 30 years and wonder why in the world we missed a tremendous economic opportunity to become the world leader in clean energy, but we chose to sit around and argue ideology? What a great use of our time-sigh…..

  • Rita Tompson-Jones

    MBH98:

    http://www.meteo.psu.edu/holocene/public_html/shared/articles/mbh98.pdf

    http://www.ltrr.arizona.edu/webhome/aprilc/data/my%20stuff/MBH1999.pdf

    Methodology was assessed and found correct:

    http://media.cigionline.org/geoeng/2000%20-%20Crowley%20-%20%20Causes%20of%20Climate%20Change%20Over%20the%20Past%201000%20Years.pdf

    And further tested and found correct:

    ftp://ftp.soest.hawaii.edu/engels/Stanley/Textbook_update/Science_303/Luterbacher-04.pdf

    And once again test and found correct:

    http://coast.gkss.de/staff/storch/pdf/moberg.nature.0502.pdf

    And yet again tested and found correct:

    http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~mann/shared/articles/mannjones03.pdf

    And again tested and found correct:

    http://www.snolab.ca/public/JournalClub/Chris.pdf

    Scientists have not found any problems with the methodologies; only hysterical paranoid denailists are able to see them, and they refuse to show their discoveries to scientists.

    “The test in science is whether findings can be replicated using different data and methods. More than two dozen scientific papers, using various statistical methods and combinations of proxy records, have produced reconstructions supporting the broad consensus shown in the original 1998 hockey-stick graph, with variations in how flat the pre-20th century “shaft” appears. The 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report cited 14 reconstructions, 10 of which covered 1,000 years or longer, to support its strengthened conclusion that it was likely that Northern Hemisphere temperatures during the 20th century were the highest in at least the past 1,300 years. Ten or more subsequent reconstructions, including Mann et al. 2008, have supported these general conclusions.”

    “At the end of April Science published a reconstruction by J. Oerlemans based on glacier length records from different parts of the world, and found consistent independent evidence for the period from 1600 to 1990 supporting other reconstructions regarding magnitude and timing of global warming.[154] In May the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research advised media about a detailed analysis by Eugene Wahl and Caspar Ammann, first presented at the American Geophysical Union’s December 2004 meeting in San Francisco, which used their own code to replicate the MBH results, and found the MBH method to be robust even with modifications. Their work contradicted the claims by McIntyre and McKitrick about high 15th century global temperatures and allegations of methodological bias towards a hockey stick outcomes, and they concluded that the criticisms of the hockey stick graph were groundless”

    “Various criticisms of the MBH statistical methods were discussed in the context of more recent research which explored ways of addressing these problems, and showed greater amplitude of temperature variations over 1000 to 2000 years. Recent papers cited included Wahl & Ammann 2006 (in press). On McIntyre and McKitrick’s criticism of principal component analysis as tending to bias the shape of the reconstructions, it found that “In practice, this method, though not recommended, does not appear to unduly influence reconstructions of hemispheric mean temperature”, and reconstructions using other methods were qualitatively similar. Some of the criticisms of validation techniques were more valid than others, these issues and the effect on robustness of the choice of proxies contributed to the committee’s view of increased uncertainties. They called for further research into methods and a search for more proxies for earlier periods.

    At the press conference the three NRC panelists said they found no evidence supporting the allegations of inappropriate behavior such as data manipulation, or “anything other than an honest attempt to construct a data analysis procedure”. Bloomfield as a statistician considered all the choices of data processing and methods to have been “quite reasonable” in a “first of its kind study”. He said “I would not have been embarrassed by that work at the time if I’d been involved in it”. In response to a question from Edward Wegman on the MBH use of principal components analysis, Bloomfield said this had been reviewed by the committee along with other statistical issues, and “while the issues are real, they had a very minimal effect, not a material effect on the final reconstruction.”

  • justmewhoelse12

    How dome Obama would sign these executive orders and almost the next day companies were jumping through hoops to implement to not get fined or whatever. Trump recinds the EO’s and we get ” Trump will take formal steps to repeal…” How come?

  • PoliticalBrew

    I gave references – History Channel video clip. Here’s another 1st sentence 2nd paragraph of BIOGRAPHY section https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallace_Smith_Broecker

    If you have some, please let me know. BTW man failed at warming since Lincoln if you’re aware of Professor Don Easterbrook’s testimony – the 3rd reference I’ve given you without attacking you personally – a technique used too often in absence of references.

  • Peter

    Of the many examples, of which one are you fondest?

  • Peter

    Please quote the first usage of the term “global warming” when it was coined in 1823. Who was the person who coined the term? How much global warming had occurred by that time, and over what time period? Was the claim scientifically evaluated in a scientific journal that you can name? How much global war has occurred since that time in 1823 until now, October 2017 ? Is the warming of the globe at runaway rates as of yet? The frogs in the water would like to know.

  • Teresa Nazareth

    CNN, NY Tlimes and other fake media, you’ll are behaving like a swarm of maggots, go back to your rotten carcass where you’ll belong, remember there is strength in honesty. We finally have a President who has a backbone of steel and decency to stand up to you swarm of maggots and your Deep State who are getting frustrated that our President and Vice President are not joining your evil ways of retaining power, lining your pockets at the cost of the majority of hard working American citizens paying taxes. Tell me, do any of you’ll sleep well and are truly happy? even with your dead consciences, in your lives you’ll cannot possibly be satisfied hence these evil attempts to get satisfaction, which you’ll will never achieve unless you’ll change your evil ways.

  • Evermyrtle

    Because Trump is no putty in the liberals, they hate him and will take him down if they can, anyway they can. Conservatives should be out there trying to ambushing dirty anti-America plans!!

  • Evermyrtle

    Liberals were spoiled by eight years of anti-CHRIST rule!! Watch them go, as they rip into Trump!!

  • Evermyrtle

    Global warming=BS!

  • John Cunningham

    Not so much by that rule itself but, the belief that was the beginning of a thousand years of Liberal rule. Now hopefully they will all do the Jim Jeffords swan dive. A big hole a lot of dirt and wah la!

  • Evermyrtle

    I’ve been around and have seen very little change in the weather now that it was when I was a child. I can well remember my dad on the back porch checking the temperature, so tell me where are these great weather changes taking place? I have not seen them!!

  • Peter

    I,m with you on this. I am just cross-examining Desertphile to see if he can back his claims where he similarly cross examines Political Brew. Of course he can’t. I don’t think he has to jump out of the steadily heating pot yet, even though he claims the heating has been happening since 1823. That’s because it is not happening to ‘Freddo’ Desrtphile at all.
    One man seems right till another comes and examines him.

  • Peter

    You said “everyone”. That is an all inclusive word embracing antagonistic mainstream media and alternate media as one.
    You have undone the splintered divide due to be conquered, and rendered them unconquerable by making them splinters ‘stronger together’ in true Fascist tradition.
    Hillary kept muttering the snide slogan ‘Stronger Together’, that Fascist motto. The Ministry of Truth propaganda uses the term also in the sense of ‘Divide and Conquer’. ‘EVERYONE’ joined as one via ‘social inclusion’ into a Roman Fasces binding a dual axe-head made ‘stronger together’ when wrapped by a laurel wreath symbolizing ‘Caesarian Military Power’, two of which hang on the wall behind the Speaker’s rostrum in the House of Reps, because the Republic IS Fascist – is the ‘wolf in a sheepskin’ Ministry of Truth term for ‘DIVIDE AND CONQUER’.

    Would you care to elaborate on that? Or have I already accomplished that for you?

  • Light_V_Dark

    Spiritual Warfare…That we all BREATHE, puts them into tongue swallowing convulsions.

    Watch “Kanye West Compares Himself To Jesus On Jimmy Kimmel Live” on YouTube

    https://youtu.be/59eHp5m3wAE

    Watch “Hollywood is Crumbling!” on YouTube

    https://youtu.be/70tbgwPz76I

    Watch “Book of Isaiah – Chapter 3 – KJV Audio Bible” on YouTube

    https://youtu.be/7QGYfCWr-Aw

  • Light_V_Dark

    All the Left can do, is mock us and sneer at how stupid we are, and how the world would be better off without us…and #ChristiansREFUSEtoJUDGE (on Facebook).

    https://youtu.be/P0C_MI-T7N0

  • Light_V_Dark

    From #MaoistRebelNews chiding #BLMterrorists at DART MOUTH! https://youtu.be/KVN6UVSiNIs

    Gay Scientist, Vulgarian…ENTERTAINER/COMEDIAN/HATETHEIST… ???

    https://youtu.be/9sRhrAKuL9E

    https://youtu.be/6eqCaiwmr_M
    I have no idea what point the kids are trying to get across…

  • Light_V_Dark

    #TheWICKED are ALWAYS #SexualPerverts, #ManQuellers, #Effeminate, #Fearedful, #Unbelieveful, #Obtuse, #Contentious, #Juvenile, #VULGAR, #SOLIPSISTIC AND #ARROGANT!
    .
    ?? ?? ??? ??
    https://soundcloud.com/militant-de-lenfant/cogwatch-7-the-soviet

    ?? Gay Bud #sniffed at me 11 hours ago

    Oh, good grief. People of #yourilk have to drag gays into every discussion even when it has nothing to do with gays. #Getalife

    To you, who have nuts, #junkies, #ALKIES and #SJW #TWINKS IN YOUR FAMILY…YOU AREN’T DOING THEM ANY FAVORS BY #APPEASING THEM!
    #RestoringSanityRally, Racism & Rage:??? https://youtu.be/88Cl7_w7SNQ

    https://youtu.be/E4i3bAtEuJE snoop shoots clown…

    “He who hasn’t a #hardheart when young, will never have one.” #NietzscheBietzsche…
    http://68.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m560eypabh1rxhxa1o1_500.gif

  • Light_V_Dark

    https://youtu.be/Gi8CWmgmx1g Passive Aggressive Queers For Muslims

    https://youtu.be/dJLZVuQVa5U?t=4m25s #StupidAssHoe praying to Allah to give her strength to kill us…

    https://youtu.be/l3q7Fqw8OTQ Sane black woman, daring to excoriate HATEFUL BLACK LESBIAN ACTIVISTS… Fewer than 150 views, 8 thumbs ups including mine…WE’RE DEAD!

  • Light_V_Dark

    #ChristiansRefuseToJudge, FB..2 Timothy 3 https://www.facebook.com/dmerchant2/posts/10211377170718204
    https://youtu.be/6UwfsvIKBFA

    Thank you, good night.

  • Light_V_Dark

    #Amerikan men aren’t far behind. The poor #WomanCHILD INTERVIEWER JUST, DOESN’T GET IT! #lolPEACE! ???

    https://youtu.be/MErnRJluMQE

  • Light_V_Dark
  • Light_V_Dark

    ??? TED 5 days ago
    Trump is as wacky … and as dangerous … as the weirdo in North Korea … and whatever Mueller and the media can do to help contain Trump will be greatly appreciated by the majority of informed and thinking Americans. Trump is a travesty in process and is another minority president, like Bush II, whose ignorance is doing irreparable harm to this county.

    https://youtu.be/OknULqCwl1Q

    Watch “Hillary Clinton Surprises CANDY A$$ Stephen Colbert for Epic Name Drop Off HD” on YouTube

    https://youtu.be/Yl1EGA-Xnoc

    https://youtu.be/YXdn6yeAdPM Hippy Colbert

    Had Bernie won, would their response be like this? Watch “Outraged Bernie Supporters Rattle Cages at DNC” on YouTube

    https://youtu.be/QGWq3jpt_os

    Watch “Reaction to Nevada Democratic Convention DNC; Bernie Sanders Supporters Fight!” on YouTube

    https://youtu.be/rArpYQOr8hE

  • Light_V_Dark

    When a Lefty denounces the little guy, I listen…Obama’s a punk!

    https://youtu.be/eOi-Xagj8Jg

  • Light_V_Dark

    https://youtu.be/SXxHfb66ZgM Liberals Are EVIL on EVERY TOPIC!

  • Light_V_Dark

    Most of you have never even HEARD OF MALIK SHABAZZ. And, you CHRISTIANS, FORGIVE HIM…

    https://youtu.be/tz5BzIrHulE