Accuracy in Media

The 1999 book, Hell to Pay: The Unfolding story of Hillary Rodham Clinton, asked, “Will there be another President Clinton?” The question has become front and center 17 years later, as the current presidential campaign unfolds. The author, Barbara Olson, who also wrote the follow-up, The Final Days: The Last Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House, was the lawyer and conservative commentator who was murdered by Islamic terrorists when the aircraft she was on, American Airlines Flight 77, was hijacked and flown into the Pentagon in the September 11, 2001, attacks. The crash killed 125 people on the ground and another 64 passengers and crew.

These two books are absolute must-reads in order to understand the power-driven Bill and Hillary Clinton relationship. Olson provides the best account of Hillary’s emergence as a “budding Leninist” who studied Saul Alinsky and “understood the Leninist concept of acquiring, accumulating and maintaining political power at any cost.” Her work went into our own August 2003 AIM Report, “Hillary Clinton’s Biggest Cover-Ups.”

Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.


  • IronChefSandwiches

    It’s interesting that you post this “article” on the same day that the FBI released ALL of its findings, once again clearing Clinton of breaking any laws in the EMail non-scandal. Your desperation should be funny to me. Instead, it’s just sad and pathetic.

  • Aniela

    Here we go again. It seems that repubs can’t bring any sort of plans to the table, so they distract (or try) to divert our attention.

  • Austinniceguy

    I’m waiting for the next batch of emails from Assange. I was thrilled to see what the first batch did to the party and he claims the next batch will bring irreparable damage due to proof of the pay to play schemes she was involved in during her tenure as SOS. I will be SOOOO happy to see if they are able to bring this vile, putrescent, lying, cheating, scandalous POS gash down once and for all. Then she and the rapist can just ride off into the sunset and leave us be.

  • Austinniceguy

    With any luck the next batch of hacked emails will be released just in time to bring the filthy POS gash and her rapist “husband” down, once and for all.

  • Jack Parsons

    FBI Director James Comey may have attempted to sell the line that Clinton did not intend to break the law, but considering the size and scope of her mishandling of sensitive intelligence, it is more than a little hard to swallow what Comey was dishing out. Considering that the Justice Department has prosecuted people for far smaller infractions, it will be interesting to see if — now that it can be easily demonstrated that Clinton knew she was breaking the law — Comey will continue to oppose her indictment.

    While testifying before a House Oversight Committee, Comey was questioned about his assertion that Clinton did not know she was breaking the law because she did not know what a classified marking was. As The Hill reported, Comey answered:

    “No, not that she would have no idea what a classified marking would be,” Comey responded. “It’s an interesting question whether she … was actually sophisticated enough to understand what a C in [parentheses] means.”

    “You asked me if I would assume someone would know,” he added. “Probably before this investigation, I would have. I am not so sure of that any longer. I think it’s possible — possible — that she didn’t know what a C meant when she saw it in the body of an email like that.”

    While the too-stupid-to-know-it-was-criminal defense is not exactly new, it is hardly something one would expect on the resumé of a presidential candidate. Besides that, Comey was assuming — or at least asserting — that Clinton would not have known what “(C)” meant when it appeared in a document containing intelligence information. Now that it is known that she had seen that designation in at least 23,035 classified cables, perhaps Comey will offer the defense that he isn’t qualified for his post either. After all, the ability to conduct an investigation without being swayed by political concerns is certainly a prerequisite for qualification to sit at the helm of the FBI.

  • R Miller

    Didn’t understand…, careless with government activities…, poor judgement! What part of that qualifies Hillary to be president. No human in the world, other than a Clinton, could attend a security briefing. QUALIFIED??? This is like vertigo-or lala land.
    There is nothing about her that is credible.

  • R Miller

    Amazing, Hillary provides our enemies with serious intelligence data, and you cover by calling people who see this as a diversion. What are you smoking, or shooting up?

  • Aniela

    I could smoke, drink, snort, shoot up, inhale or whatever, yet still make more sense than Trumpsters.
    hic-hic—scuse me


    Just what would these people need to do for you people to admit they are corrupt, evil, lying, self centered, pieces of crap who shouldn’t be allowed to breath the same air as normal people much less be in charge of our lives? Maybe if they lined a a whole bunch of their followers and put them on their knees and shot them in the head on national TV, would that finally do it for you?

  • jug

    Its people like you and Aniela, who are “just sad and pathetic!”

  • Jack Parsons

    I can honestly say that for the first time in my life there is a chance at breaking the Establishment’s control of federal government, and returning it to the people. We have for too long been caught up in a dumbed down republican/democrat paradigm, which is no choice at all. Clinton represents the Establishment. She is bought and paid for. Her loyalties are to the corporate contributors and foreign despots who control her, not Americans.
    Trump, on the other hand takes no corporate or foreign money. He is not controlled. That is why the Establishment fears him like they have no other. For possibly the first time since Kennedy, we have a chance to have a President who is his own man. Not someone else’s man. It is the idea behind Trump, breaking the Establishment, more so than Trump himself that any check and balances loving American can support.

  • I am puzzled by one development not questioned by anybody in the media, including not only the stooges [E.g. CBS Margaret Brennan, the vile Obama’s bag lady at the press conference], but also other genuine journalists. When Obama endorsed Clinton for President, how did the vile Obama know what would be the outcome of the FBI investigation, which was released after the endorsement. Weren’t we told by the liar Obama that he had distanced himself from the investigation and that it would be handled honestly and objectively? Does anybody doubt that this incident reveals the corrupt and dishonest character of the DOJ? And we haven’t even mentioned that AG Lynch met with Husband Clinton days before the FBI announcement. And, not a stinking word from the vile Obama, who, miraculously, has converted our Country into a banana republic. BTW, even the despot, Idi Amin, of Uganda, would have been impressed with the vile Obama’s handling of our justice system. Hell, if Idi were alive, he might well have recruited Obama as his chief of staff. Our banana republic is rapidly becoming the best ever.

  • IronChefSandwiches

    I’ll say this. Your delusion level is off the charts. LOL GOD, I would I could be in the room with you when all the networks call the election for Clinton in a landslide. I wanted Sanders myself but watching you lose your s**t would be SO awesome. LOL, loser.

  • Testzali

    It is clear who is deluded here

  • She must spend most of her income on insurance and lawyers.


  • Austinniceguy

    The really funny thing here is going to be when those email do get released and the contents push the worthless gash over the edge with her VERY obvious health issues. I WILL do a happy dance if she suffers a richly deserved massive coronary.


    It is almost certain that as president The Hag would do things, probably by decree, that large constituencies in this country would find constitutionally or morally intolerable. These could include abrogation of the Second Amendment, planned or attempted confiscation of legally-owned firearms, revocation of the tax exemption of faith-based institutions that do not comply with “civil rights” directives regarding homosexuality that conflict with their doctrines, prosecution for “civil rights” violations of clergy for failing to perform same-sex marriages, use of fines and penalties to close faith-based social agencies for violation of regime directives regarding abortion or sexual preferences that they cannot conscientiously accept, imposition of taxation or allocation of money by executive order without the consent of Congress or the naturalization by decree of enough illegal aliens and their extended families to create a permanent non-American minority. If such illegal or immoral executive orders were to be backed by the police power of the federal government, many Americans would have no choice but to consider secession or revolution. It is increasingly looking like oath-observing and Constitution-respecting military officers and free citizens who do not want to be subjects in a tyrannical one-party presidential “republic” need to consider their options in such a situation.

  • IronChefSandwiches

    “worthless gash” “richly deserved massive coronary”

    Not only are you a delusional idiot who doesn’t understand the concept of evidence…you’re have no class, either. Say hi to everyone in the trailer park for me.

  • IronChefSandwiches

    Great comeback, coward-who-makes-a-new-screen-name-only-to-run-and-hide.

  • Austinniceguy

    I’ll start with your gash of a mother as I strap her mattress to her back to get her ready for her shift, tonight. And, we’ll talk evidence when the next batch of hacked emails is released, that’s going to be a little slice of heaven for those of us who just want her to implode and leave this world before she completely ruins it. You thought it would be cool to be vulgar toward me so I though it would be a blast to return the sentiment, I was ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!!!! ROTFFLMFAO!!!

  • IronChefSandwiches

    I love watching mouth-breathing idiots when they try to claim the high road. It’s not the swearing. It’s the utter lack of class that makes you such an awful human being. Enjoy President Clinton II this fall!

  • madhatter46

    My goodness-what silliness–stereotyping “all,” demonizing not qrguing–sounds like rule #13–fro Alinsky’s “Rule for Radicals.” Usually when all you can do is make fun of others, you don’t have much of an argument. Hic-hicing isn’t good for your health Leads to confusion and destroying brain cells.

  • madhatter46

    My goodness-tribe vs. tribe–name-calling–stereotyping, demonizing the “other” sounds so Stalinistic, Goebbels-like, and Mao’s re-education camps. Meanwhile the politicians from both parties love it—they stay in power, and actually show contempt for the hoi polloi. Orwell predicted in his fictional (?) novel. “1984.” Remember Big Brother’s daily required 2 minute hate sessions of the opponent. Meanwhile, the self-anointed elites (both parties)–like the pigs in Orwell’s. “Animal Farm.” feast at the banquet table among themselves. Truth? Character? Virtue? Or–you can keep your doctor, Benghazi caused by a video, shovel-ready jobs, demonize Wall Street as you collect millions from their banks, Arab Spring, Russian Reset, foundations that only distribute 10% of its revenue while the principals fly 1st class around the world facilitating uranium sales. sex with an intern on the floor of the Oval Office, Travelgate, Whitewater. bring a gun to a knife fight?. on and on. Yes, lets just call the other tribe names, it will make us feel better and more importantly keep the corrupted in power–see Francis Bacon’s. “Idols of the Tribes.

  • BakkenBill

    Odd article, considering there was no plane in the Pentagon. So where did it go?