Accuracy in Media

A magazine called the Economist has an “intelligence unit” that has named a Donald J. Trump presidency as one of the top 10 greatest risks to global stability. Communist China and jihadi terrorism also made the list, but somehow the Obama administration and the Russian government were left off. Though flawed, the effort by the media to identify security risks is a good one. It is the big issue of our time.

But rather than identify security risks based on subjective criteria and personal biases, the media should insist that the FBI be given the power to conduct a comprehensive background check on U.S. presidential candidates, and release those results to the American people. We should know by now that politicians can lie and engage in cover-ups. Just look at the Dennis Hastert hush-money and child abuse case. His cover-up went on for decades.

The American people have every right to insist that candidates be investigated by the FBI and that the results be disclosed publicly. Currently, candidates for federal office, including for the presidency and Congress, don’t have to go through background checks. Instead, the media are supposed to conduct inquiries for the benefit of the people. Too often they fail to do so.

Their reluctance may stem from discomfort over the possibility that skeletons in their own closets might be exposed. Consider the case of Fox News Chief White House correspondent Ed Henry, now on leave after allegations surfaced of an extramarital affair with a Las Vegas “hostess.” His wife, National Public Radio (NPR) reporter Shirley Hung, has a profile noting that she managed CNN’s Washington-based National Security unit, covering the Pentagon, State Department, intelligence, terrorism and other issues related to national security. Henry met her when they both worked at CNN.

It’s not known how long Henry was trying to protect his own private life from public exposure, although reports indicate his affair had been going on for at least ten months. He had high-level assignments at Fox News, including covering the Obama administration, the Benghazi terror attacks, and the leaks from NSA defector Edward Snowden.

Back in 2008, we at Accuracy in Media warned that the Barack Obama presidential candidacy was a Trojan horse, and that his communist connections in Hawaii and Chicago needed investigation by the FBI and the media. The media did their best to obscure the evidence, including his relationship with a suspected communist espionage agent by the name of Frank Marshall Davis. It turned out Davis was also a pornographer and child abuser.

The FBI was never called into that case because candidates for federal office—then and now—have been spared such scrutiny. It is a loophole in our system and the media have not done a good enough job filling the void.

As we’ve reported in the past, former FBI agent Max Noel has said the Bureau used to investigate candidates for federal employment—but not candidates for federal office—by analyzing Character, Associates, Reputation, and Loyalty to the United States. The first letters in those words make up the acronym CARL. Noel said that Obama could not have been elected president if he had been subjected to the CARL test.

It’s not too late, however, to apply the CARL test to Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump.

Mrs. Clinton was asked to disclose certain things about her background when she assumed the post of secretary of state. However, Clinton went on to allegedly violate the Espionage Act by using a private unsecure server to send and receive classified email messages. It’s likely that Russia and China obtained intelligence from Mrs. Clinton about the intentions of top leaders. Such information could have been as valuable as Snowden’s release of more than one million classified documents.

Mrs. Clinton’s reputation as a security risk has even alarmed analysts now considered to be on the left. Former CIA analyst Ray McGovern, writing on the left-wing website Consortium News, suggests the possibility that a foreign intelligence agency had access to Mrs. Clinton’s emails. He likewise suggests that the information our enemies obtained contributed to the killing of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other U.S. personnel at the U.S. mission and CIA Annex in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012. He says, “…if there is any indication that Clinton’s belatedly classified emails contained information about internal State Department discussions regarding the consulate’s security shortcomings, questions may be raised about whether that information was somehow compromised by a foreign intelligence agency and shared with the attackers.”

Mrs. Clinton’s private emails were originally disclosed by a Romanian hacker, Marcel Lehel, known as “Guccifer.” He has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of wire fraud, unauthorized access to a protected computer, aggravated identity theft, cyberstalking and obstruction of justice. He was extradited and made his initial appearance on April 1 in federal court. He tells Catherine Herridge of Fox News that it was easy to breach Clinton’s personal email server.

It’s clear that Clinton is a security risk, based on her criminally negligent handling of classified information. But what about Trump? His pro-Russian views and hiring of pro-Russian advisers have raised red flags in the national security community about whether he can be trusted to handle classified information. There’s also the matter of his mental abilities and intellectual prowess. In his attempt to deny Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) a win in the Indiana primary, Trump cited the National Enquirer on “Fox & Friends” and used an unsubstantiated story from the supermarket tabloid to smear Cruz’s father as having been involved with the assassin of U.S. President John F. Kennedy.

Trump has commented repeatedly on the fact that the FBI doesn’t have the ability to investigate the background of Muslim refugees coming into this country from places like Syria. Trump says, “We have no idea who these people are. We are the worst when it comes to paperwork. This could be one of the great Trojan horses.”

Ironically, like Obama, Trump may himself be a Trojan horse. He is not vetted by the FBI, either. He has produced some paperwork, such as a financial disclosure form, which was required by law but has not been audited for accuracy. He refuses to release his tax returns, using as an excuse that he is facing an IRS audit. Newsweek has just published a major article on his mobster connections. One has to assume there is much more damaging information to come, perhaps from the FBI.

The Washington Post is correct that Trump has been “the least transparent candidate” on the Republican side. It notes that Senator Cruz and other GOP candidates disclosed tax returns going back at least four years. Trump, by contrast, released nothing.

What’s more, it has now been confirmed that Trump has 378 entities registered in the state of Delaware, a legal maneuver that can be used to assure corporate secrecy and hide income. Hillary Clinton has taken advantage of the same loophole, but to a lesser extent.

Trump has released a “health record,” a laughable four-paragraph summary referring to his “astonishingly excellent” physical health. Mrs. Clinton’s “Healthcare Statement” is longer and mentions several medications she is taking. Neither addresses mental health issues.

Coming to the end of the presidential primary season, we know a lot about Hillary Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee, because of her time in office. The evidence demonstrates that she is a full-blown security risk who should be indicted for her reckless criminal conduct as Secretary of State. In addition, enough information has been assembled by Peter Schweizer, the author of Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, to link her work in office to making millions of dollars for the Clinton Foundation. She worked with her husband to sell out to foreign interests. She is still adamant about not releasing the transcripts of her lucrative speeches before Wall Street firms, using the excuse that such disclosure hasn’t been done before. It’s an obvious cover-up.

With Trump, who has made the kind of money Hillary and Bill Clinton only dream about, not only do his tax returns remain private and his mobster ties generate controversy, his dealings with the old Soviet Union and Russia continue to remain a subject of deep concern. The Russians are ecstatic over the possibility that he will win the American presidency and pull the plug on NATO and U.S. allies in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.

On NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday, May 1, before he dropped out of the race, Senator Cruz was asked repeatedly by host Chuck Todd about whether he would pledge his allegiance to Trump.  The Senator would not fall into the trap and demanded a debate with Trump so the facts about his positions and views on the issues could be disclosed. He said, “The media created this Trump phenomenon, and then they don’t hold him accountable.” Cruz said, however, that he was sure that the media would eventually ask Trump some questions “if he’s the nominee in the general election.” He explained, “Suddenly you’re going hear every day about Donald Trump’s tax returns. When was the last time you talked about his tax returns?”

The implication is that the media gave Trump a free ride because they wanted him to be the Republican nominee. Once he became the GOP nominee, he suggested, the media would take an interest in the skeletons in Trump’s closet. By then, however, it would be too late for the Republican Party to reverse course. They would be stuck with a certain loser in November who would probably take down the Republican House and Senate.

Trump’s tax returns, ties to mobsters, and a relationship with Russian billionaire Aras Agalarov, an associate of Vladimir Putin, are all subjects that the American people have a right to know much more about.

If Mrs. Clinton is “Crooked Hillary,” then what is Trump? It would appear that he’s not so much the master of the art of the deal, but the master of the art of the cover-up. He is “Cover-up Donald.”

Which candidate is the greater security risk? We report. You decide. It’s time for the major media to do their jobs. Stop treating the presidential contest as a reality TV show or an athletic competition. Get off your duffs and investigate these candidates.




Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.

Comments

  • Curtis Everett Reed

    #BernieOrBust

  • Bennie Bennett

    It is outrageous that this has happened. Again. Why are we so dumb?

  • jug

    Same old shjt!
    People all over the world, different times, make horrendus mistakes in judgment!

    Hitler was voted in, as was , Mr. Peanut, worst president in history before obama, who also fooled the great majority.

    And now what choices do we have?

    Two liberal NY democrats, one a lying, theiving con artist, that has already proved her malfeasence in federal office, over and over.

    The other a questionable “business man”, running on the republican ticket, that lies almost as much and likely has ties to both the local and the Russian mob, and certainly the Russian govt!

  • gwsmith

    You want us, the public, to investigate? Cliff, it’s your job. That’s what you get paid for. Stop posing conspiracies and dig up the facts. The major media are globalists and not willing to divulge anything that would despoil the Globalist agenda. Why aren’t you calling them the “cover-up media”?

  • JES

    Hi, I think Cliff may have been speaking to the investigative reporters in DC area to “get off your duffs and investigate these candidates”, not to the general public.

  • john robel

    “WE” aren’t, it’s the uninformed emotional reactionaries that are.

  • Larry Sparks

    Democratic voters forget how Hillary tried to steal $120,000 in furniture and art from the White House in December 2000, and was forced to return the items. As the old saying goes, a leopard does not change its spots. Hillary has been dishonest
    all her life, Hillary must not be President.

  • NERDWORLD PROBLEMS

    This is the best smear campaign they can come up with? Seriously?

    Find a millionaire or billionaire who doesn’t try to protect their income from the IRS, they all do it. That in reality is why the general public hate them, they can actually get away with it, we would all love to do it.

    He owns hotels, casinos and real estate in New York with restaurants in them, try building anything in New York or doing business in New York without getting to know and working with the Mob guys who run all the things you need to do business or build there.

    He doesn’t have to release anything in the way of his paper work till he is officially embraced by the party as the official candidate, which they have yet to do, seriously, do you blame him, he has won, he’s the last guy standing and they are still trying to come up with some sleazy way of over riding the will of the people and sliding in their choice.

    Last but not least, why do people consider it such an issue that he and Putin respect each other, that’s a good thing folks, consider what Putin has done during this time that Obama has been in office. It’s no secret Putin has zero respect for our too feminine, whiny, foot stomping, little weasel, Muslim sellout, embarrassment of a potus.

  • reb

    The email scandal is BAD but her attempt to erase is criminal! Nixon eraced 18 minutes and was impeached !
    Hilary eraced over 28 months and will also be impeached just like Nixon was ! Why go through all that ? Just arrest her now for the crime of Obstruction of Justice and get this over with …Bernie vs Trump! Bring it on!

  • 2011RedSox

    The sad truth is that the leaders (the McConnells, Boehnerdict Arnolds, Ryans, Priebus’ and Roves) of the republican party have lied to us for a decade or more… so long that it created this disgusting situation by not following what were once core principals or adherence to the values of the base from whom they vilely asked monetary, political and moral support.

    Now they deserve to have as its runner a narcissistic, chameleonesque, charlatan, lunatic progressive against another of deeply infested crooked background.

    For our family NO vote can nor shall be cast for either evil.

  • 2011RedSox

    Bust would be best.

  • 2011RedSox

    Shillary…. Donigula?

    NOT anything but a rotten choice in that basket of fetid fruit.

  • Larry Sparks

    Where is the evidence that Trump has ties to both the local and Russian mob? The smear tactics is be expected.

  • Richard Hellstrom

    How can Hillary take 8 million dollars from George Soros for her campaign who’s known as an economic war criminal around the world and prosecuted in France and has every bit of the intention of breaking the green back , flooding America with immigrants and turning over the American sovereignty to a foreign embodiment and how is it the republican party isn’t saying a word about him and their seems to be no known interest by either homeland or the NSA – Soros went from having 9 billion dollars when Obama went into office and is known to be worth around 24 billion dollars today ! Some things amiss with the entire government ! For actions and conduct that would be seen as treasonable in every nation around the world is being seen as a variant of bi partisanship in America ! See Articles –
    The Center for American Progress’ Jihad Against the Free World – December 29, 2011 Daniel Greenfield – Bernie’s Billionaires — Cliff Kincaid — August 24, 2015 – The Hidden Soros Agenda: Drugs, Money, the Media, and Political Power –
    Cliff Kincaid — October 27, 2004 – Top 10 Reasons George Soros Is Dangerous by Human Events – George Soros and John Kerry – 2015/11/02/ London – — Soros-admits-involvement-in-migrant-crisis-national-borders-are-the-obstacle/ – —-Soros: National Borders Are The Enemy -November 3, 2015 Matthew Vadum — George Soros donates $8 million to boost Hillary —-The radical billionaire denounces his native Hungary for protecting its borders and culture. —– No, George Soros Didn’t Give $33 Million to # Black Lives Matter by Ben Collins at the Daily Beast –

  • Tonya Parnell

    ROMNEY & RYAN ARE LIARS-LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE & the LYING MEDIA is not exposing it:

    (Federal Election Commission)

    FILING FEC-1047622

    1. ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT, INC.

    C/O RED CURVE SOLUTIONS, LLC

    138 CONANT STREET, 2ND FLOOR

    BEVERLY, MA 01915

    NOTE: Address is different than previously reported

    Email: rfp@redcurve.com

    2. Date: 01/30/2016

    3. FEC Committee ID #: C00431171 This committee is a Principal Campaign Committee. Candidate: MITT ROMNEY / PAUL D. RYAN

    Party: Republican Party

    Office Sought: President

    State is in District:

    Affiliated Committees/Organizations

    ROMNEY VICTORY, INC.

    C/O RED CURVE SOLUTIONS, LLC

    138 CONANT STREET, 2ND FLOOR

    BEVERLY, Massachusetts 01915

    Affiliated Relationship Code: Joint Fundraising Representative

    Custodian of Records:

    TIM JOST

    C/O RED CURVE SOLUTIONS, LLC

    138 CONANT STREET, 2ND FLOOR

    BEVERLY, MA 01915

    Title: Form 1 for

    Phone # (617) 231-4350

    Treasurer:

    DARRELL CRATE

    C/O RED CURVE SOLUTIONS, LLC

    138 CONANT STREET, 2ND FLOOR

    BEVERLY, Massachusetts 01915

    Title: TREASURER

    Phone # (617) 231-4350

    Designated Agent(s):

    TIM JOST

    C/O RED CURVE SOLUTIONS, LLC

    138 CONANT STREET, 2ND FLOOR

    BEVERLY, Massachusetts 01915

    Title: ASST. TREAS.

    Phone # (617) 231-4350

    Banks or Depositories

    BANK OF GEORGETOWN

    1054 31st STREET NW

    SUITE 18

    WASHINGTON, DC 20007

    CHAIN BRIDGE BANK

    1445-A LAUGHLIN AVENUE

    MCLEAN, Virginia 22101

    Signed: DARRELL CRATE

    Date Signed: 02/01/2016

  • Tonya Parnell

    Romney perfected the art of the leveraged buyout which cannibalized industrial towns across America.

    Let’s all remember how much he loves and admires Trump.

    Romney: “There are some things you just can’t imagine in your life. This is one of them.” He even praised Trump as being a more successful businessman than himself. Romney: “I spent my life in the private sector — not quite as successful as him, but successful nonetheless,” “Donald Trump has shown an extraordinary ability to understand how our economy works,”

    Romneys’ various offshore investment accounts worth potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in the secretive tax havens of Cayman Islands and Bermuda

    Romney was acorporate raider, who threw people out of work and sent jobs out of our country.

    Romney originally thought Bush would win & then he would be VP or certainly a Cabinet position (until Trump came along).

    Romney will abolish “Obamacare,” throwing tens of millions of Americans back out of health insurance programs and leaving them, as he suggests, to the mercies of emergency room treatment.

    Romney determined to outlaw abortion, wants to deprive women of choice and of the right to control their bodies.

    Romney says he wants a more forceful intervention in Syria, and seems willing to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities near Isfahan (likely killing 100,000 people)

    . Romney says he will recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and it seems clear he will back to the hilt the creeping illegal Israeli annexation of the Palestinian West Bank

  • Tonya Parnell

    ROMNEYWATER

    Mitt has his nerve to complain about someone’s business practices when he himself has been saddled with numerous bankrupties & dishonest lawyers.

    Romney’s hedge fund was associated with lawyers who routinely engaged in Fraud Upon The Court, conflicts of interest, stolen properties.

    Lots of stars & big businesses use the bankruptsy laws to their advantage because the laws allow it. Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital was in busuness to game the system:

    • Stage Stores

    • Bonus Stores, Inc.

    • KB Toys, Inc.

    • eToys

    • F. A. O. Schwarz

    Much of Romney’s wealth came from leveraging companies with crushing debt and using a team of trusted specialists who mastered the art of manipulating bankruptcies that left investors and creditors with little or nothing.

    2012 quote from ROMNEY about Trumps’s endorsement:

    “There are some things that you just can’t imagine happening in your life. This is one of them, being in Donald Trump’s magnificent hotel, and having his endorsement is a delight. I’m so honored and pleased to have his endorsement. Donald Trump has shown an extraordinary ability to understand how our economy works, to create jobs for the American people. He’s done it here in Nevada. He’s done it across the country. He understands that our economy is facing threats from abroad. He’s one of the few people who stood up and said, “You know what, China has been cheating. They’ve taken jobs from Americans. They haven’t played fair. We have to have a president who stands up to cheaters.” So I want to say thank you to Donald Trump for his endorsement. It means a great deal to me to have endorsement of Mr. Trump and people across this country.”

    ALL ROMNEY WANTS TO DO IS STEAL THE VOTES FROM MR. TRUMP.

    Donald Trump has been so good-hearted to Democrats & Republicans in the past as a businessman, this is not what he deserves.

    GO TRUMP

  • Tonya Parnell

    Clinton Foundation Failed to Disclose 1,100 Foreign Donations

    Hillary Clinton’s presidential run is prompting new scrutiny of the Clintons’ financial and charitable affairs—something that’s already proved problematic for the Democratic frontrunner, given how closely these two worlds overlap. Last week, the New York Times examined Bill Clinton’s relationship with a Canadian mining financier, Frank Giustra, who has donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation and sits on its board. Clinton, the story suggests, helped Giustra’s company secure a lucrative uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan and in return received “a flow of cash” to the Clinton Foundation, including previously undisclosed donations from the company’s chairman totaling $2.35 million.

  • Tonya Parnell

    Hillary Clinton committing treason against the people of the United States through the illegal appropriation of uranium, at both the Bundy and the Hammond ranches and then selling the uranium to the Russians in order to help fund her presidential run through a largely untraceable offshore account.

  • Tonya Parnell

    Thick as Thieves: AG Loretta Lynch’s Law Firm Tied to Hillary Clinton (GOOGLE)

  • Tonya Parnell

    Hillary Clinton Linked to Company Being Sued over Flint Water Crisis

    April 16, 2016

    (dcclothesline)

    Adding to a mounting list of scandals under the family’s belt, the Clintons have now been tied to the Flint water crisis. As the Daily Caller reports, a top executive of the same agency facing multiple lawsuits for its role in poisoning the children of Flint also has ties to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and provides free PR for the Clinton Global Initiative.

    Pete Wentz, Ron Brynaert explains in the Daily Caller, is the executive director of APCO Worldwide’s Chicago branch and also serves as spokesperson for Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam Inc. (LAN) — the engineering firm named in several lawsuits “alleging gross negligence, professional negligence and battery for alleged lead poisoning of 50 children in Flint over the last two years.”

    Additionally, APCO Worldwide has contributed as much as $50,000 to and worked closely with the Clinton Foundation — itself the subject of criticism for alleged ties to Hillary’s campaign.

    LAN, Brynaert says, is listed in at least nine of the rapidly-growing lawsuits over the Flint water crisis because the firm was “hired to oversee a refit of the city’s nearly century-old Water Treatment Plant when Flint separated from the Detroit Water and Sewage Department in April 2014.”

    “LAN provided these specific services in a responsible and appropriate manner in accordance with industry standards,” Wentz reportedly stated at the beginning of February.

    In an 116-page report issued in March, the task force examining the Flint water crisisslammed the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) as the “cause” of the crisis and, “[m]oreover, when confronted with evidence of its failures,” said it“responded publicly through formal communications with a degree of intransigence and belligerence that has no place in government.”

    In addition to MDEQ, that report targeted emergency managers, who “made key decisions that contributed to the crisis, from the use of Flint River to delays in reconnecting to DWSD [the Detroit Water and Sewage Department] once water quality problems were encountered.”

    Though it attempted to contact LAN for its cooperation in the investigation, the Detroit Free Press says the task force was unable to obtain an interview and lacked power for a subpoena — but had previously placed blame for the lead contamination on the city and MDEQ and rebuffed any intimations of its own involvement.

    According to one source, Houston-based LAN, “which has Michigan offices in Flint and Lansing, has made more than $3.5 million on various city contract awards since preparing an analysis in 2011 for then-Mayor Dayne Walling about using the Flint River as a water source.

    “[One potential class action] lawsuit alleges the company knew that river water needed anti-corrosion treatment chemicals, didn’t require them and didn’t evaluate water coming out of the tap before completing the switch to river water.”

    Speaking on behalf of LAN, Wentz stated flatly: “We believe that this lawsuit has no merit and will vigorously defend our position in court.”

    Both Wentz’ and APCO’s connections with LAN appear to be somewhat murky, as the former doesn’t list the latter as a client on its website, the Caller pointed out; and Wentz lists APCO, not LAN, as his employer on LinkedIn — despite his acting as LAN spokesman.

    While the link between APCO, LAN, and Hillary Clinton might appear somewhat murky on surface examination, it’s worth noting it stands as yet another instance of Hillary Clinton’s hypocrisy.

    “I was so angry. I was outraged and I know you must feel exactly the same,” Clintonsaid of the Flint contamination in early February, calling the contamination with lead andgovernmental culpability “immoral.”

    She added, “Repairing trust is as important as repairing pipes.”

    Perhaps Hillary Clinton should take her own advice.

  • Tonya Parnell

    BOMBSHELL: Panama Papers Expose Clinton’s Elite and Criminal Campaign Donors (DCCLOTHESLINE)

    As her clearly delusional and overtly corrupt supporters cheer her on, Hillary Clinton manages to avoid prosecution, scrutiny and maintains a public persona, thanks largely to the mainstream media, as if she is the nation’s wonderful mother figure. To the Futurama fans out there, however, the only motherly figure Hillary Clinton resembles is the not-so-wonderful Mom, from Momcorp. Still, her ardent supporters overlook ties to the bankingelite, her complete lack of accomplishments, and her horrific record overseas.

    But, thanks to the recently leaked Panama Papers, that public persona is getting peeled back layer by layer. Recently leaked names from the papers link the campaign financed-careers to Hillary and the former President Bill Clinton to those who use the offshore tax shelters. Not only do their financiers use unethical offshore tax-havens, but many of them are downright criminals.

    Earlier this month, the hypocritical Clinton blasted those who were exposed and tied to the offshore tax havens.

    “Some of you may have just heard about these disclosures about outrageous tax havens and loopholes that super-rich people across the world are exploiting in Panama and elsewhere,” she told the AFL-CIO. “We’re going after all these scams and make sure that everyone pays their fair share here in America. I’m gonna hold them accountable and we’re gonna have a special effort to track all these resources wherever they might lead.”

    Shortly after she publicly decried those who use shell companies, her two shell companies in Delaware were exposed.

    As the Washington Free Beacon reports:

    Hillary and Bill Clinton quietly set up two shell companies listed at “1209 North Orange Street” in 2008 and 2013, the Washington Free Beacon has found. The names of the companies, but not their location, were first made public in tax filings released by Hillary Clinton last year.

    According to records, one of the Clintons’ “1209 North Orange Street” companies is WJC, LLC, which was set up by Bill Clinton in 2008 as a pass-through for his consulting fees.

    Another company at the same location, ZFS Holdings, LLC, was set up in February 2013, one week after Hillary Clinton left the State Department. Hillary Clinton received $5.5 million from her book publisher, Simon & Schuster, through the company.

    As if running shell companies in the US wasn’t hypocritical enough, the Clinton’s have been exposed by a report from McLatchy showing them to have multiple connections with people who have used the besieged law firm Mossack Fonseca to establish offshore entities.

    These ties are not only friendly ones but financial relationships directly responsible for funding their campaigns.

    According to the report, among those ties, are Gabrielle Fialkoff, finance director for Hillary Clinton’s first campaign for the U.S. Senate; Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining magnate who has traveled the globe with Bill Clinton; the Chagoury family, which pledged $1 billion in projects to the Clinton Global Initiative; and Chinese billionaire Ng Lap Seng, who was at the center of a Democratic fundraising scandal when Bill Clinton was president. Also using the Panamanian law firm was the company founded by the late billionaire investor Marc Rich, an international fugitive when Bill Clinton pardoned him in the final hours of his presidency.

    These ties are both recent and decades old, exposing the unscrupulously financed and criminal careers of the Clintons dating back to the 1970s, when Bill was just coming on to the political scene.

    While the names of the Clintons themselves have yet to come from the Panama Papers, it is clear that their super elite and criminal connections were made early on, and have been maintained for decades, which reveals their ‘down home, self-made, American family’ sales pitch as a complete fraud.

    Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world.

  • Tonya Parnell

    Chelsea Clinton: Scalia’s Out of the Way, so now we can gut the Second Amendment

    The death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in February left the nation in shock. It further made his death questionable that an autopsy was not performed. It also stirred upsome controversy in the Senate as to whether or not they would even have hearings regarding an Obama appointment to replace Scalia, namely Merrick Garland. However,now we have Chelsea Clinton referencing Scalia’s death as she campaigns for her criminal mother, Hillary, and she has declared the without Scalia around, they will be able to pass gun control.

    Chelsea Clinton spoke at an event in Maryland on Thursday and claims that since Justice Antonin Scalia had died, now is the time to pass gun control legislation, and she believes the Supreme Court will “make a definitive ruling” ruling in favor of gutting the Second Amendment.

    “It matters to me that my mom also recognizes the role the Supreme Court has when it comes to gun control. With Justice Scalia on the bench, one of the few areas where the Court actually had an inconsistent record relates to gun control,” Clinton said. “Sometimes the Court upheld local and state gun control measures as being compliant with the Second Amendment and sometimes the Court struck them down.”

    Now, some used to think that Chelsea was innocent and that it was only her parents who were the corrupt ones. That has long been left behind, especially in light of the fact that she is right in the middle of The Clinton Foundation scandal.

    Clinton went on to cite ultra-leftist gun grabbing advocates to bolster her promotion of more gun control.

    “If you listen to Moms Demand Action and the Brady Campaign and major efforts for smart sensible and enforceable gun control across our country, with disclosure having endorsed my mom, they say the next time the court rules, it will make a definitive ruling,” she said. “So, it matters to me that my mom is the only person running for president, who not only constantly makes that connection, but also has a strong record on gun control and standing up to the NRA. This is one of those issues I didn’t know I could care more about until I became a mother and I think every day about the Sandy Hook families’ children don’t come home from school, and I can’t even imagine that living horror and tragedy.”

    Well, let’s just be honest about a few things, shall we? First, Moms Demand Action engage in outright lying, rude behavior (for which they were removed from a Tulsa Chipotle) and even engage in indecent protests.

    Second, the Brady Campaign is teamed up with America’s enemies, including the Islamic Society of North America, to take guns from Americans.

    Third, Hillary Clinton is a known criminal and her attacks on the Second Amendment, no matter what the Supreme Court rules, are criminal in themselves. Even now the FBI is saying she is a criminal due to her illegal email server which put Americans at far more risk than law-abiding gun owners. In fact, it could be said that because of Mrs. Clinton’s actions and inactions that four Americans are now dead! I worry far more about a wicked witch like Hillary Clinton than I do about law-abiding gun owners.

    Fourth, it’s a stretch to think about Sandy Hook, since there are still many questions regarding what took place there and why? It certainly was brought front and center for Obama to push for more gun control, that’s for sure. The good thing was that it wasstopped dead in its tracks.

    Fifth, and finally, if Chelsea understood motherhood, she would have herself at home taking care of her child (Titus 2:4-5) rather than doing all this pandering. If she truly understood what it is to protect her child, she would never send them to public schools, something the Clintons don’t do anyway. She would also learn to use a weapon to defend herself and her child when presented with a threat. That’s what real mothers do Chelsea! They certainly don’t promote a woman who is advancing the same gun control agenda the Weimar Republic did and was later fulfilled under the Nazi regime in Germany under Adolph Hitler.

    Courtesy of Freedom Outpost

  • Tonya Parnell

    EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton Campaign Bundler Is Directly Lobbying For Saudi Arabia (Daily Caller)

    A major Hillary Clinton campaign funder is personally lobbying on behalf of an arm of the Saudi government, federal records show.

    It’s been known for months that the Center for Studies and Media Affairs at the Saudi Royal Court, an arm of the Saudi regime, has been paying the Podesta Group to lobby lawmakers and federal agencies on its behalf. The Intercept reported the relationship last year. And The Hill reported on Tuesday that the Saudi government was paying the Beltway lobbyist $140,000 a month for its services.

    But documents recently published by the Department of Justice under the Foreign Agents Registration Act show that Clinton campaign financier Anthony Podesta is one of the several lobbyists at his firm personally handling the Saudi account.

    The 72-year-old is one of the Clinton campaign’s most prolific bundlers, though it would be hard to tell just from the lobbyist disclosure report he’s required to file. The document, filed on March 11, shows Podesta gave $10,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and $2,700 to New York Rep. Gregory Meeks

    But the lobbyist-rainmaker has bundled a much larger sum of cash from among his circle of wealthy friends and business associates. Campaign finance disclosures show he raised $35,560 for Clinton inthe first quarter of 2016. That’s on top of the $130,900 he raised for the campaign last year.

    Podesta also has family ties to the Clinton campaign. His brother John is Clinton’s campaign chairman. He served as Bill Clinton’s chief of staff for a time in the 1990s and as an adviser to President Obama. The Podesta brothers started their eponymous lobbying outfit in 1988.

    The Saudi Royal Court’s contact with the Podesta Group is part of a sprawling effort to prevent passage of a law that would allow victims of terrorism to sue foreign governments which have aided and abetted terrorists.

    A recent “60 Minutes” report has renewed interest in claims that classified documents contained in the 9/11 Commission report show that Saudi government officials had ties to some of the 9/11 hijackers. Fifteen of the 19 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia.

    According to The Hill, the oil-rich nation, which is considered an ally of the U.S., doled out $9.4 million in all of 2015 to prevent passage of the bill, which is co-sponsored in the Senate by New York Sen. Chuck Schumer and Texas Sen. John Cornyn

    As The Intercept noted in an article last month, the Podesta Group has helped the Saudis manage public relations during other high-profile cases.

    Following the execution in January of Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr, the firm put The New York Times in touch with a Saudi commentator named Salman al-Ansari who claimed that the Shi’ite cleric was a terrorist. Nimr was a vocal critic of the Saudi royal family and had called for free elections there.

    The Times report reads:

    “We are speaking of a terrorist person,” said Salman al-Ansari, a Saudi commentator provided by the Podesta Group, a public relations firm working for the Saudi government.

    Mr. Ansari accused Sheikh Nimr, who was in his mid-50s, of organizing a “terrorist network” in Shiite areas in eastern Saudi Arabia and compared him to a Qaeda ideologue who sanctioned the killing of security forces.

    The Saudis have hired several other firms besides the Podesta Group, including BGR Group, DLA Piper, Hogan Lovells, and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. They have also threatened to use the power of the purse to quash the 9/11 bill. The royal family has reportedly told U.S. officials that it will sell off $750 billion in U.S. Treasuries if the law is passed. The Obama administration has said it opposes such a bill because it will open Americans up to legal problems overseas.

    While Clinton has said she supports Schumer’s bill she has not made its passage a priority on the campaign trail, even as she’s been campaigning in New York, where the 9/11 terrorists slammed airplanes into the World Trade Center.

    During an interview with her friend George Stephanopoulos on ABC’s “The Week” on Sunday Clinton said that she did not know anything about Schumer’s legislation. But after some quick criticism, her campaign scrambled to release a statement saying that she did back the measure.

    On Monday while campaigning with Schumer, Clinton said she supported the bill. But she was less clear on whether she believes that the Obama administration should declassify the 28 pages contained in the 9/11 report that reportedly show links between the hijackers and the Saudi government.

    ree to our

    “I think the administration should take a hard look at them and determine whether that should be done consistent with national security,” Clinton said.(RELATED: Hillary Clinton Softens Position On Declassifying 28 Pages In 9/11 Report)

    That’s a not-so-subtle shift from 2003 when, as a New York senator, Clinton signed a letter with other senators demanding that President George W. Bush declassify the pages.

    Clinton has other financial ties to the Saudis. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has donated between $10 million and $25 million to Clinton’s family charity, the Clinton Foundation. Another group called Friends of Saudi Arabia has given the Clinton Foundation between $1 million and $5 million. And two members of the Saudi royal family have given a total of between $200,000 and $500,000 to the organization.

  • Tonya Parnell

    DISGRACED CLINTON DONOR GOT $13M IN STATE DEPARTMENT GRANTS UNDER HILLARY (The Daily Caller) 4-18-16

    Hillary Clinton’s Department of State awarded at least $13 million in grants, contracts and loans to her longtime friend and Clinton Foundation donor Muhammad Yunus, despite his being ousted in 2011 as managing director of the Bangladesh-based Grameen Bank amid charges of corruption, according to an investigation by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

    The tax funds were given to Yunus through 18 separate U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) award transactions listed by the federal contracting site USAspending.gov.

    They highlight how Clinton mixed official government business with Clinton Foundation donors. Yunus gave between $100,000 to $300,000 to the foundation, according to the Clinton Foundation website.

    Groups allied to Yunus received an additional $11 million from USAID, according to the contracting website. Yunus had business relationships with all of them.

    Sponsored Links by

    For more than 30 years, Yunus oversaw the distribution of Grameen Bank “micro-credit loans” to the poor to set up small businesses. He was eventually regarded as a saint among many anti-poverty activists.

    But he also got a big helping hand over the three decades Bill and Hillary Clinton actively promoted him and repeatedly showcased him as a celebrity figure at major Clinton Foundation functions.

    The former president is credited with launching a personal lobbying campaign to press the Nobel Committee to award its peace prize to the Yunus. It did so in 2006.

    Secretary Clinton’s mixing of official work with foundation donors is reportedly the focus of a second, less publicized FBI public corruption investigation of the former secretary of state. The more widely known FBI probe focuses on her use of a private email server located in her New York residence to conduct official government business.

    “Presumably if The Daily Caller News Foundation has this information, then the FBI has it,” said Robert T. Hosko, former assistant director of the Bureau’s criminal division. “Certainly, the FBI would want to know the nature of these relationships,” he told TheDCNF.

    “That’s precisely the sort of thing that the FBI would be looking at and should be looking at to determine whether there’s an official act of corruption,” he said.

    The FBI declined comment, saying, “we generally do not comment on whether or not we’re conducting a particular investigation.”

    Clinton was not shy about using her post as America’s chief diplomat on behalf of Yunus and Grameen Bank when the Bangladesh government announced an investigation into multiple allegations of financial mismanagement by the political activist.

    Clinton rocked the Bangladeshi political establishment when she publicly intervened on behalf of Yunus in 2011 as the South Asian government prepared to launch its probe.

    With Bangladesh Foreign Minister Dipu Moni — also a woman — at her side, Clinton said at a State Department news conference that “we have expressed directly to the government our concern and hope that the Grameen Bank … is able to continue to function productively on behalf of the people of Bangladesh.”

    Emails from Clinton’s private server disclose that Bill and Hillary Clinton closely monitored the Bangladesh government’s investigation of Yunus, who is a high-profile fixture at most of the Clinton Foundation’s major gatherings. The foundation features him at 37 places on its website.

    David Bossie, president of the conservative activist group Citizens United and a long-time Clinton critic, called for the FBI to look into possible conflicts of interest linked to the long association between Yunus and the Clintons.

    “The mixing of State Department and U.S. government business with Clinton Foundation donors and interests is a prime example of what the FBI could be investigating in addition to the private email server setup.” Bossie told TheDCNF.

    The Clinton-Yunus relationship dates from Bill Clinton’s tenure as Arkansas governor, when he and Hillary fell in love with the concept of micro-credit loans. Yunus, then a Bangladesh economist, has championed the micro-credit cause through Grameen Bank since 1978.

    Things went terribly wrong for Yunus and Grameen Bank about five years ago when a number of independent authorities decided to take a closer look at the bank and the 50 inter-related enterprises Yunus created, most of which operate in Third World countries where there is little financial oversight.

    Former Secretary Clinton and her husband closely followed Yunus’ mounting problems. A June 11, 2012 email from Amitabh Desai, the foundation’s foreign policy director, for example, alerted Hillary Clinton of a Yunus response to the Bangladesh investigation.

    “In case you haven’t seen it already, WJC wanted HRC and you to see this,” Desai said in the email routed through Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff, and Huma Abedin, her deputy chief of staff. “WJC” is Bill Clinton and “HRC” is Hillary Clinton.

    Hosko said the email “is potentially an indicator of the co-mingling of state business with the Clinton Foundation. It is very concerning.”

    Clinton’s aid to Yunus also included 18 grants, contracts and loans awarded to two of his America-based foundations, the Grameen Foundation USA and Grameen America, according to USASpending.gov.

    The awards, totaling $13 million, were issued by the U.S. Agency for International Development, the development arm of the State Department, beginning when Clinton became secretary of state. Another $11 million in federal funds went to organizations allied with Yunus.

    When asked to explain the Yunus grants and loans, USAID Spokesman Raphael Cook said the agency didn’t have the “manpower” to respond to questions about the transactions.

    Other federal agencies also opened their coffers to Yunus after Clinton entered the administration. The Department of Treasury awarded a $600,000 grant directly to Grameen America under a fund designed to boost financial institutions in community development. A Treasury Department spokesman declined to provide any details beyond the fact the funds were for activities in New York.

    A series of Small Business Administration grants to Grameen America also began in July 2011, totaling $934,000. Those grants were for “salaries and expenses” for the foundation to operate its New York offices where Clinton once a U.S. senator.

    In addition to being revered among anti-poverty activists, Yunus was popular among elements of the Bangladesh military. When a group of generals overthrew the Bangladesh government in January 2007, Yunus considered establishing a new political party to lead the new military-led government, thereby legitimizing the coup.

    Should The FBI Investigate The Clinton Foundation’s Relationship With entitles you to Daily Caller news updates free of charge.

    The BBC reported April 7, 2007, that “the army would sponsor Nobel Peace prize winner Dr. Muhammad Yunus as a new leader.”

    Sabir Mustafa, the BBC’s Bengali Service editor, added that “Dr. Yunus is still viewed as a credible candidate by elements in the army.” In the end, Yunus opted not to create the new party.

    The Grameen Foundation, USA did not respond to a request for comment from TheDCNF. Neither did spokesmen for the Clinton presidential campaign or the Clinton Foundation.

  • Tonya Parnell

    Exposing The Clinton Global Financial Network-Revelation in the Panama Papers

    Breitbart) – Revelations in the Panama Papers that key Clinton financial partners had numerous offshore entities is the latest investigation to expose the secretive Clinton Global Financial Network.

    That network, which includes controversial financiers and foreign entities, has operated with the infusion of funds from offshore accounts and entities around the world. And there are more revelations to come.

    As the Panama Papers reveal, major Clinton financial partners, including Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra and the Chagoury family of Nigeria, made use of the controversial Panamian law firm Mossack Fonseca to move assets around the world. Giustra is one of the largest contributors to the Clinton Foundation, donating more than $25 million. The Chagoury’s of Nigeria have committed $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative

    Several key figures in the uranium deal that sent 20 percent of American uranium production into the hands of the Russian government had offshore entities created by Mossack Fonseca. Frank Giustra used the firm to create UrAsia Energy, the company that acquired lucrative uranium concessions in Kazakhstan with the help of Bill Clinton back in 2005. UrAsia Energy eventually became Uranium One, which acquired uranium assets in the United States and then was sold to the Russian State Nuclear Agency (ROSATOM) in 2010.

    Because of the obvious national security implications of turning over control of large quantities of uranium to the Russian government, the deal required approval from Hillary Clinton’s State Department before it could go forward. Nine shareholders in Uranium One sent a combined $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. Some of those contributions were not disclosed by the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One Chairman Ian Telfer sent the Clinton Foundation more than $2 million. Those contributions were revealed first inClinton Cash and discovered using Canadian tax records.

    Sergei Kurzin, a Russian mining investor who was also involved in the Uranium One deal, also used Mossack Fonseca. Kurzin’s name appears on several oil companies set up by the firm. Kurzin says he donated $1 million to the Clinton Foundation.

    Mossack Fonseca helped Nigeria’s Ronald Chagoury set up a firm called Echo Art Ltd. which was domiciled in the British Virgin Islands.

    This is not the first time that offshore accounts that figure into the Clinton’s Global Financial Network have been exposed. Two years ago a Swiss whistleblower released the names of the super-rich who held Swiss accounts via the bank HSBC. As an earlier investigation by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists revealed, up to $81 million has flowed to the Clinton Foundation via Swiss accounts. As the investigation revealed, Swiss accounts were held by numerous Clinton donors.

    Jeffrey Epstein, the controversial financier and convicted sex offender, held money in a HSBC Swiss account. He contributed $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

    British retail magnate Richard Caring gave the Clinton Foundation $1 million from his HSBC Swiss account in 2005. He made the donation shortly after Bill Clinton attended his charity ball dressed as a Russian General.

    Frank Giustra held an account at HSBC, valued at up to $10 million in 2006-2007. His first contributions to the Clinton Foundation were in 2005.

    American entrepreneur Eli Broad held accounts at HSBC. He is a $1 million plus contributor to the Clinton Foundation.

    Denise Rich is the ex-wife of financier and one-time international fugitive Marc Rich, who was pardoned by President Bill Clinton on his last day in office. Rich has contributed up to $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

    Maintaining bank accounts in Switzerland or creating offshore corporate entities are not illegal. Representatives for Giustra and others insist that they comply with tax laws. But it is hard to escape the fact that firms such as Fonseca advertise their services as a means to minimize tax burdens and keep assets hidden.

    On the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton has condemned what she calls “outrageous tax havens and loopholes that super-rich people across the world are exploiting.” She has also promised to shut down the “private tax system for the wealthy.”

    Look for more to come out on the Clinton Global Financial Network in the months ahead.

    (breitbart.com)

  • Tonya Parnell

    Records Show Clinton Only Candidate to Receive Campaign Money from Federal Reserve Officials

    As her clearly delusional and overtly corrupt supporters cheer her on, Hillary Clintonmanages to avoid prosecution, scrutiny and maintains a public persona, thanks largely tothe mainstream media, that she is America’s saving grace.

    But, thanks to the recently leaked Panama Papers, that public persona is getting peeled back layer by layer. Yesterday, the Free Thought Project reported on the recently leaked names from the papers that link the campaign financed-careers of Hillary and the former President Bill Clinton to those who use the offshore tax shelters. Not only do their financiers use unethical offshore tax-havens, but as we showed, many of them are outright criminals.

    It seems that the only thing missing from Clinton’s rap sheet are outright admissions of murder and conspiracy. And, judging from her recent “success” in the widely rigged polls, it is not so far-fetched to think that she could actually admit to conspiracy and still be President.

    According to federal records, Hillary not only runs multiple shadowy shell companies, and has virtually unlimited support from an international elite cabal, but she is also in the pocket of the Federal Reserve.

    According to the records at the Federal Election Commission, Hillary Clinton has received multiple donations from a top Federal Reserve official. Since 2007, when she was at the Brookings Institution, Lael Brainard has been funneling money to Hillary. In 2014, after serving as a senior official at the Treasury Department, Brainard was placed on the Washington-based Federal Reserve’s board of governors and continued her support.

    Since her stint at the Fed, Brainard has made three such donations to Clinton’s campaign, Hillary for America. While the donations remain relatively small, the idea of Federal Reserve officials donating money is entirely out of the ordinary.

    As the Post reports, Federal Reserve board members are presidential appointees, but the central bank has fiercely defended its decisions as free from political influence. Republicans have criticized the Fed for keeping interest rates too low for too long and have supported several bills that attempt to rein in the central bank’s power. Meanwhile, Democrats are urging the Fed not to raise interest rates too quickly to support faster growth. Both parties have questioned the Fed’s relationship with the big banks that it is charged with regulating.

    Under federal law, Fed governors — along with any employees of the executive branch — are barred from engaging in partisan activities, but they are allowed to vote and make campaign donations. In practice, central bank officials rarely make contributions while in office. Federal records do not show any other members of the Fed’s policy-setting committee having made a political donation so far this election cycle.

    “Gov. Brainard’s donations are clearly legal,” said Sarah Binder, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who has analyzed the Fed’s relationship with Congress. “It’s a problem of perceptions: the contributions fuel GOP charges that the Fed board is too close to the Democratic White House. It’s just that much harder for the Fed to duck out of the political winds during an election year when a governor contributes to a presidential candidate.”

    The donations were initially reported on by Bloomberg last month, and since then, the Fed has remained mum, with only a small statement coming from the Fed Chair, Jenet Yellen reassuring Americans that the Fed remains neutral. After all, whether it’s a red or a blue dollar matters not in the world of the international banking cartels.

    Hillary Clinton’s shadowy history continues to make headlines, yet she continues to win primaries. If this is ‘Democracy’ what in the literal Hell is tyranny?

    Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world

  • Tonya Parnell

    The Video That Could Bring Down Hillary Clinton’s Campaign

    Posted on April 21, 2016

    (DCCLOTHESLINE)

    After New York’s stunningly disorganized and questionable primary results proved, yet again, our elections are rigged to ensure establishment darling Hillary Clinton garners the Democratic nomination, a new video from Abby Martin’s Empire Files could topple Clinton’s entire campaign.

    Evidence of said rigging isn’t difficult to find — it’s written directly into the electoral process in superdelegates, whose 700 “unpledged” votes remain uncommitted to a candidate until the nomination. This is “to ensure nominees are hand-picked party insiders,” as Martin explains in the video.

    “The single vote of a superdelegate is worth thousands of ours,” Martin notes.“Many of these people are current and former members of Congress, and dozens more are literally corporate lobbyists working on behalf of every industry from healthcare to private prisons.”

    In fact, the employment of superdelegates was initiated precisely for situations when the people’s choice doesn’t align with the establishment’s — such as the current overwhelming popularity of Bernie Sanders.

    But the web of corporate media executives and insiders contributing directly to Hillary Clinton’s campaign couldn’t possibly explain the extreme bias, lack of criticism, and virtual media blackout on Sanders’ success, right? And her campaign, dripping with corporate lobbying cash, wouldn’t concern the American voting public, even though lobbyists literally act as superdelegates — would it?

  • Tonya Parnell

    Here’s the Evidence: These State Dept Transcripts Prove Hillary knew Benghazi was an Islamic Jihad Attack

    Anyone remember when Hillary Clinton claimed that the mother of fallen Benghazi hero Sean Smith was a liar and wrong? I do! Now, we are not only speculating about Clinton’s lies, along with Obama’s, but we have definitive proof that she lied and continues to lie in the face of the American people about the Islamic jihad attacks that took place in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, blaming them on an irrelevant video.

    Judicial Watch reports:

    Judicial Watch announced today it has obtained new documents from the Department of State containing the telephone transcripts from the evening of September 11, 2012, in which then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton informs, then-Egyptian Prime Minister Hisham Kandil that the deadly terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi “had nothing to do with the film.” The documents include previously unreleased telephone transcripts with world leaders about the Benghazi attack.

    Clinton’s admission to Kandil was first produced to the Select Committee on Benghazi on October 13, 2015 and publicized on the day of Mrs. Clinton’s testimony, October 22, but court filings in Judicial Watch litigation show that the record was only produced after two federal court judges ordered the State Department to produce more Benghazi-related records to Judicial Watch. Similarly,Judicial Watch litigation also forced the release of the September 11, 2012 email in which Secretary of State Hillary Clinton informed her daughter by email that the attack had been staged by an “Al Qaeda-like group,” rather than as the result of “inflammatory material posted on the Internet,” as Mrs. Clinton had claimed in her official public statement one hour earlier.

    A court order is what was needed to produce this information as a “free society,” governed by those in the society can’t seem to mask their criminal activity well enough.

    However, at 10:08 pm on the night of the attack in Benghazi, Clinton issued a press statement, which was approved by the White House, which placed the blame of the attacks on the now debunked video, which was the scapegoat in the entire matter. This must have been the result of her call to Obama around 10pm, even though the Obama administration claims no calls were made.

    Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

    However, the following morning, at 7:49, Mrs. Clinton said, Clinton said, “We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack – not a protest.”

    That was then confirmed by then-Egyptian Prime Minister Hisham Kandil, who said, “You’re not kidding. Based on the information we saw today we believe that group that claimed responsibility for this is affiliated with al-Qaeda.”

    Later, in a September 15th call, Clinton told then-Egyptian Foreign Minister Mohamed Amr, “I have repeatedly, as has the President and other officials in our government, deplored not only the content of this stupid, very offensive film… But we have to exercise more self-discipline… otherwise we’ll be in a vicious downward circle against everyone who has ever felt offended, particularly on the internet….”

    Isn’t that interesting? It’s interesting because Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Soebarkah both stood while the bodies of fallen Americans were delivered to the families and openly declared that “stupid, very offensive film,” which Hillary paid $70,000 in tax dollars for a video apology and which Susan Rice went on five Sunday shows and apologized for, was the reason for the deaths of four Americans.

    The reality is much different.

    According to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton:

    “There are two scandals here. The first is Hillary Clinton was telling different stories to different foreign leaders about the Benghazi attack – including an admission that it was a terrorist attack. The second is the State Department’s cover-up of these documents. The State Department is forcing Judicial Watch to play ‘whack-a-mole’ with Clinton and Benghazi documents. It is no wonder that two frustrated federal court judges granted Judicial Watch discovery into the Clinton FOIA issues.”

    Indeed, then let’s lump in the fact that the video is important, that the video producer was a Muslim and that he was tied to the Obama Justice Department. It’s as if the entire thing was orchestrated with full knowledge of the Obama administration and the video in question was merely a scapegoat to attempt to coverup a jihad attack on Americans in Benghazi for the sake of weapons transfers and possible kidnapping.

    Courtesy of Freedom Outpost

  • Tonya Parnell

    Bill Clinton And The Pedophile: The Sex Scandal That Could Destroy Hillary’s Presidential Ambitions

    Why did a convicted billionaire pedophile named Jeffrey Epstein that pimped out underage girls to powerful men have 21 contact phone numbers for Bill Clinton? And why did Clinton fly on “multiple occasions” to the private Caribbean island where Epstein regularly held wild sexual orgies? Let me give you a hint: it was not to discuss politics over milk and cookies. Every once in a while, we get a small peek into the twisted sexual world of the global elite. In this case, a Florida lawsuit that alleges that Britain’s Prince Andrew had sex with a 17-year-old “sex slave” provided by Epstein is making headlines all over the planet. But of potentially even greater importance is what this lawsuit is revealing about Bill Clinton. If it can be proven that Bill Clinton had sex with underage girls provided by Jeffrey Epstein, that could potentially destroy any chance that Hillary Clinton has of winning the presidency in 2016.

    The 17-year-old girl that Prince Andrew is alleged to have had sex with is named Virginia Roberts. She is claiming that she once received $15,000 for having sex with him…

    A teenage “sex slave” says she was paid $15,000 for bedding Britain’s Prince Andrew by the American billionaire who served as the royal’s procurer.

    Virginia Roberts was 17 when Wall Street honcho and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein allegedly pimped her out to the prince.

    “A lot of powerful men were part of Jeffrey’s scene, but I specifically remember Andrew,” Roberts told Britain’s Daily Mail.

    And it is a fact that Jeffrey Epstein is a convicted sex offender. He was convicted by a court of law for paying a 14-year-old girl 300 dollars to massage him and have sex with him…

    Epstein’s sexual exploits have been documented since 2005, when a woman in Palm Beach contacted police saying that her 14-year-old daughter had been paid $300 to massage him and then have sex.

    The claim prompted a nearly year-long investigation that led to the eventual charge of soliciting prostitution which came as part of a plea deal. He spent 13 months of a 18-month sentence in jail and remains a registered sex offender.

    Since that time, approximately 40 other women have accused Epstein of sexual misconduct.

    So needless to say, this is one very sick individual.

    And right now the mainstream media in the U.S. is largely ignoring the fact that Bill Clinton flew down to Epstein’s private Caribbean island on “multiple occasions” between 2002 and 2005. The following is from a British news source…

    Over the years, the casually-dressed, globe-trotting financier, who was said to log more than 600 flying hours a year, has been linked with Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker and Manhattan-London society figure Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the late media titan Robert Maxwell.

    Epstein reportedly flew Tucker and Spacey to Africa on his private jet as part of a charitable endeavour. Clinton, meanwhile, flew on multiple occasions in the same plane to Epstein’s private Caribbean island, Little St James, between 2002 and 2005 as he developed his philanthropic post-presidential career. It would later be alleged in court that Epstein organised orgies on that same private island in the US Virgin Islands.

    A lot of Democrats are going to end up reading this article, and a lot of them are going to start making apologies for Clinton at this point.

    So let’s get one thing straight. It is not okay for anyone to have sex with underage girls. Whoever breaks the law by doing so deserves to go to prison. That includes Bill Clinton if it can be proven that he did this.

    And without a doubt, Clinton and Epstein were very close. In fact, court records show that Epstein had 21 different phone numbers for Clinton…

    While Clinton was never deposed, lawyers obtained Epstein’s computerized phone directory, which included “e-mail addresses for Clinton along with 21 phone numbers for him, including those for his assistant (Doug Band),” according to a court filing.

    In addition, Epstein had contact information for a whole host of other powerful politicians and celebrities…

    From his 97-page ‘black book’ of phone numbers and email addresses, it is clear Epstein had an impressive array of contacts.

    When its contents were disclosed three years ago, the book was shown to include contact details for former US President Bill Clinton, ex-secretary of state Henry Kissinger, and Barbara Walters, then one of America’s most influential broadcasters.

    Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson’s details are there, along with entrepreneur Donald Trump, members of the Kennedy family and former prime minister Tony Blair.

    If this scandal is not covered up, it could eventually bring down a lot of people.

    What makes things even worse for Bill Clinton (and others) is that Epstein apparently used hidden cameras to record the sexual trysts that were going on in his guest bedrooms. The following is from an article that appeared in the Mirror…

    Prince Andrew’s tycoon pal may have taken compromising photos of him with the underage girl he is alleged to have abused.

    Details buried in original court papers filed against pervert Jeffrey Epstein, 61, reveal that he recorded the sordid orgies he threw for VIPs at his luxury homes using cameras hidden in the walls of guest bedrooms.

    So if Bill Clinton did commit a crime, somewhere there may actually be video of it.

    But wait, there’s even more to this story. The following comes from the Daily Mail…

    The lawsuit claims that Clinton was friends with an unnamed woman who ‘kept images of naked underage children on her computer, helped to recruit underage children for Epstein… and photographed underage females in sexually explicit poses‘.

    While he cut off ties with Epstein, this woman’s abuses apparently did not end their relationship as she was reportedly one of the 400 guests at Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding.

    Though the lawsuit may be bringing up sexual skeleton’s from Clinton’s past, he has added to the drama of late by posing for a photo with two known prostitutes at a fundraiser in Los Angeles last month.

    Obviously Bill Clinton has a lot of hard questions that he needs to answer.

    But if Bill Clinton cannot be charged with a crime, will the American people even care what else he did?

    After all, there is a long history of the American people being willing to overlook his sexual promiscuity.

    For example, in a book published last year entitled “The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of Presidents“, it was documented that one of Clinton’s latest girlfriends known as “the Energizer” sometimes brought cookies to the Secret Service agents that guard Bill…

    Energizer, who is described as charming and friendly, sometimes brought cookies to the agents, according to the book excerpts.

    One told Kessler: “It was a warm day, and she was wearing a low-cut tank top, and as she leaned over, her breasts were very exposed. They appeared to be very perky and very new and full … There was no doubt in my mind they were enhanced.”

    Kessler also reports that Hillary’s Secret Service detail informs Bill’s Secret Service detail when the former first lady is coming home, so Bill has time to get Energizer off the property and clean up any evidence.

    That revelation certainly did very little to upset the Hillary for president bandwagon.

    So will these new revelations about Bill’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein have an impact?

    We shall see…

  • Tonya Parnell

    Hillary Clinton Had Sex With Monica Lewinsky! (PROJECT.NSEARCH & BEFOREITSNEWS)

    It can now be reported that former Clinton era National Security Advisor and former U.S. State Department Official Forest Lindlay 301 565-0477 has released Photographs made by the U.S. Secret Service and U.S. Naval Intelligence of the First Lady Hillary Clinton having Hot Lesbian Sex with Bill Clinton Era White House Prostitute Susan who was also then White House Political Advisor George Stephanopoulos girl friend.

    We also can report that Israeli Mossad Agent Monica Lewinsky engaged in Sex with both Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton. Monica unable to be satisfied by Bill Clinton’s Cigar got satisfaction from Hillary Clinton’s 13 inch Dildo. This Sex Gate Psyop was all scripted by then Clinton Era Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr and his Stooge CIA Bush Clinton Israeli Mossad BiBi Netanyahu Stooge Larry Nichols of Conway, Arkansas.

  • Tonya Parnell

    Pulitzer Prize Winning Journalist Exposes Hillary’s Knowledge of Secret Weapons ‘Rat Line’ Which Facilitated Sarin Gas Being Given to Syrian Rebels to Frame Assad

    Renowned investigative journalist Seymour Hersh revealed striking evidence the United States — not oft-maligned Syrian President Bashar al-Assad — made possible the chemical weapons attack on civilians in Ghouta, Syria, on August 21, 2013. In fact, though the Obama administration squarely blamed Assad for that use of sarin gas, Hersh — for the first time — implicated Hillary Clinton and shadowy weapons dealings via the U.S. consulate in Benghazi,Libya.

    As Eric Zuesse explained in Strategic Culture, Hersh has not been the sole journalist calling out the questionable circumstances of the chemical attack, as there “have been multipleindependent reports that Libya’s Gaddafi possessed such stockpiles, and also that the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi Libya was operating a ‘rat line’ for Gaddafi’s captured weapons into Syria through Turkey.”

    Further, as Hersh previously reported, a highly-classified report detailing a secret agreement between the Obama administration and that of Turkey’s Erdo?an in 2012 showed “funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria.” And the entire operation was run by now-retired CIA director, David Petraeus — though he and all figures involved firmly deny the operation even took place.

    Of Hillary Clinton’s involvement, Hersh told AlterNet in an interview that Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who died in the storming of the Benghazi embassy, “was certainly involved, aware and witting of everything that was going on. And there’s no way somebody in that sensitive of a position is not talking to the boss, by some channel.”

  • Tonya Parnell

    Former Bill Clinton Mistress Comes Forward, Exposed THIS About Hillary

    “She had several abortions before she had Chelsea…”

    According to Miller, Hillary “experimented” with some girls during her college years and liked it! In addition to the abortion bomb, she also accused Hillary of being a LESBIAN !

    (ANGRY PATRIOTS.COM)

    Bill Clinton was happy to tell people that “Hillary has eaten more p**** than I have.”

    (MRCONSERVATIVE.COM)

    KILLARY has been having a lesbian affair with her top female aide, Huma Abedin.

  • RMThoughts

    Bush Republicanism and neoconservatism not only suffered a decisive defeat, Trump won the nomination, he won the argument, and he won the debate. The party is now with Trump—on the issues. For GOP elites, there can be no going back to what the grass roots rejected.

    Nevertheless we will see a lot of the neoconservatives, people who were, ironically, very close in the George W. Bush administration…going home to the Democrats from whence they came and supporting Clinton, who has a foreign policy record more akin to their own.

    Inside the Uniparty we have the convergence of neo-conservatism and liberalism. It’s interesting because for a generation it has been the constant theme of Old Right criticism of neo-conservatism that it is largely just liberal wine in a new bottle.

  • jug

    He has used a number of old crime families for years.
    One or 2 are his regular concrete suppliers.

    Imagine that, crime outfits with their own concrete companies!

    The Russian mob ties are just starting to come out.
    He has been afiliated with both the govt and the mob in his Russian dealings.
    (Thinks Putin is a Great, and trustfull leader!)

  • Russia is not the only nation with a one-party system.

  • D. G. Williams

    @jug The Clintons are a crime family. Follow their history from Arkansas to D,C.

  • Adam

    “Crooked Hillary vs. Cover-up Donald written by Stupid Cliff”. You forgot the last part!

  • ??????

    Hitler wasn’t “voted in” but, instead, was NOMINATED as chancellor in January 1933 by the president, Paul von Hindenburg. Furthermore, Hitler wasn’t “voted in” during 1932, either, but lost to Hindenburg in the run off election for the presidency. In fact, Hitler was NEVER elected to any public office. It is true, however, that gullible, feckless, German conservatives helped to lift his party of nationalistic cryptosocialism into power, so they deserve much condemnation for their stupidity and foolishness.

    Also, please stop spouting nonsense about Democrats being “liberals”. Democrats are leftists, and all leftists are wannabe totalitarians. So you make yourself look foolish and parrotlike by repeating the leftists’ own propaganda that they are “liberals”. Maybe you should take a break from watching Fox Noise. Yes, why don’t you do that for a few years. Tune out that Rush Blowhard, too.

  • terry1956

    Cliff, why just the FBI?
    Look we need to get over the notion that in the US the federal government is the only governing body that can investigate the federal bureaucrats, members of congress, the president, federal judges and those running for federal office or bring charges against them because it just is not so from a constitutional stand point except for the few exceptions for a member of congress listed in article 1 those being while in session, going to session or coming back from session but even then treason, felony and breach of peace case allows an arrest of a member of congress going or coming back from a session.
    Thus even a state district attorney and a state or county grand jury can return an indictment of a federal official including a seating president.
    I goes without saying that the above or a state attorney general, the state bureau of investigation or even a county sheriff or local constable can investigate a federal official including a seating president or a person running for president.

  • terry1956

    I’m more likely to think the author of Clinton Cash gives more accurate info than either Seymour Hersh or Roger Stone although I think the latter two gets things more right than Alex Jones who I suspect is often wrong but more right than an old dial type watch that has stopped.

  • terry1956

    Trump is far better than Clinton but still should not be trusted so much giving that he has gave favorable views on the UN before a congressional committee about 10 years or so when he was seeking a contract to renovate the UN building.
    Plus he still gives favorable remarks on Mass Murder INC ( Planned Parenthood) and eminet domain abuse.
    He also seems nieve when it comes to Putin and the Chinese Communist Party but come November I will still vote for him if he is polling ahead of Hillary by less than 20% here in Tennessee but more then I am voting for a true American patriot Darrel Castle the nominee for the Constitution Party
    constitutionparty.org

  • terry1956

    It is our Job also but it also is the job of local media, state government, county government, local government, state and county grand juries.
    Self government is not a spectator sport and it is not much more than that if all we do is vote.

  • terry1956

    It is even more important to take with a big lump of salt the talking points of RT.

  • terry1956

    Can Putin, Trump, the Clintons and the Bush’s be involved with criminal activity in violation of valid US laws?
    yes.
    Do they work together to violate America? Maybe
    Are they competitors? Yes, as well as the Chinese Communist Party, the Moslem Brotherhood, The Technocrats in the EU, The Technocrats in the UN, the Technocrats at the IMF, the Trots, the leadership in the US Congress.
    Who of the above is the lessor of evil? Trump.

  • terry1956

    I think Sanders would become a Pol Pot although he likely does not want that now.
    Trump has the danger of becoming the strong man that FA Hayek warned us about in Chapter 10 of his book The Road To Serfdom, chapter 10 called ” Why the Worst Get on Top”.
    Clinton who is the most likely( going by the polls and bookies now but Trump can still fool them) to be our next president will be worse than Obama who so far has been our worst president in US history unless we have enough anti globalist patriots in congress, state legislators, state governors seats, county sheriffs.
    If Trump is elected then we not only need antiglobalist but also internal wise antinationalist or pro federalism folks.

  • terry1956

    I doubt very much that Starr was part of any cover up and I doubt that Monica was or is a Mossad agent.

  • terry1956

    Trump has not won the nomination yet and he never won the debate because the debate never happen. Trump likely will be nominated but he has not yet.
    This year or last we never had a Lincoln/ Douglas style debate so the debate never happen.
    Of Course when was the last time we had such a debate? Maybe 156 years ago in 1860, maybe sooner I don’t know but since 1964 the year I first started to keep up with politics I never saw or read of such a debate.
    Actually it was several debates, first across the congressional district when they were running for congress and later several very long debates when they were running against each other for president.
    Trump was not willing to debate Cruz in such a way but I doubt if Cruz was willing either because they could not control the debate and regular citizens could call them out on their inaccurate statements, as well as their unnecessary remarks about their opponent as they did both Douglas and Lincoln.

  • jug

    I dont watch either!
    And democrats DONT LIKE BEING CALLED LIBERALS!

    They like the term “progresive”!

  • Larry Sparks

    Hillary will use (JUG) allegation in the campaign if it is true. If your allegation is false, be prepared to give Donald Trump an apology. I am willing to bet, you do not have the basic honesty to admit your mistake.

  • gwsmith

    OK, Terry, I’m for it.

  • Jonathan Vere

    Cliff Kincaid, do you recall the issue of The Economist from 1996 that featured a photo of Pat Buchanan on its cover, during the height of that year’s presidential primary season, accompanied by a question printed in bold type: “Voice of America?” That couldn’t be the same magazine that you mention in the opening of your article here, could it? I do know that it was part of a smear campaign similar to that now being conducted against Donald Trump, by many of the same people. Very disappointed in your article, consisting mainly of speculation and innuendo.

  • MikkeSpech78914

    my colleague wanted TX TDLR 043AB several days ago and was made aware of an excellent service with 6 million forms . If people are interested in TX TDLR 043AB as well , here’s a http://goo.gl/EnyU6P

  • Macy’s Mom

    Stop being so naieve. It is obvious that by his antics, his facial expressions and his manner, the way he flails his arms, his facial expressions, his inability to answer even one question without rancor, his narcissistic egotistical personality, and his hatred of innocent people, that Trump is definitely mentally ill. In fact, there is a psychiatrist who uses Trump’s various antics in his teaching class. There is no one running for president who can consider himself presidential when he calls people names like a 10-year-old boy on steroids. If one of our children called other people names they would not only be punished, they would be counseled to find out the underlying problem As children grow they express their anger in various ways but as they mature they realize that name calling is unequivocally stupid and they learn to not use “bad words” to describe people who do not agree with them. With Trump’s disassociative personality, I would consider him to be a very dangerous person with his fingers on the red button if he became president and became angry with a world leader if they “hurt his feelings.” This man cannot stand to lose, and I feel for those in his environment in November when he does not win the presidency.