Accuracy in Media

The Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi (CCB) recently held a press conference and issued a report uncovering new details about the events leading up to and during the September 11, 2012 attacks in Libya that took the lives of four Americans. However, the press has done what it usually does when a story threatens the narrative or reputation of the administration of President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton—they have, for the most part, ignored or misrepresented the CCB’s findings.

The speakers at our June 29 event at the National Press Club in Washington exposed, once again, how the U.S. facilitated the provision of arms to al-Qaeda-linked rebels, and demonstrated that there were many warnings leading up to the attack on the Special Mission Compound, warnings that the administration ignored. In addition, the administration was derelict in its duty to send forces to aid those under attack in Benghazi.

I said that “There’s a media theme, or meme, out there that keeps saying—and you see this [at the] New York Times, CNN, everywhere, saying, ‘No new evidence of any wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton.’ That seems to be the conclusion of most of the media in response to yesterday’s [House Select Committee report]. And we see a field of smoking guns.”

“No matter what comes out…the role of many in the mainstream media is to protect the legacy of President Obama and protect the presidential candidacy and viability of Hillary Clinton,” I argued.

I was joined by a number of other members of the CCB, including former CIA officer Clare Lopez, General Thomas McInerney, Lt. Colonel Denny Haney, Admiral James “Ace” Lyons (all retired), our attorney John Clarke, as well as guests Rear Admiral Chuck Kubic (ret.) and Charles Woods, father of Ty Woods, the former Navy SEAL who was killed in the attack on the CIA Annex.

Here are some of our findings, in the words of each of the CCB members and the guests. In my earlier column on the press conference, we included a video of the entire event, including Q&A and crosstalk among the panelists. Here we present a video of each individual speaker. If you want to see the Q&A as well, please go to the previous column:

 

Clare Lopez:

“So, when we undertook to begin this second report, we think that we bring to this topic a willingness to name names, a willingness to assign responsibility and to demand accountability that too many of the others, committees and others, have not done—have neglected to do.”

“Now, from Christopher Stevens to the folks at the CIA Annex, they were in fact then relying on exactly the jihadist enemy that was eventually to turn on them and to kill four Americans and injure others so gravely.”

“Absolutely, they [Hillary and Obama] lied. There’s no question. We know, again, from Judicial Watch documents obtained through the FOIA process that the administration, including the President and Secretary of State Clinton, were actively involved that very night while the attack was still going on in concocting a false narrative to deflect the story from the truth and to defend at all costs, even the cost of American lives, the re-election campaign of the President. They were not even decided on which video they were going to blame. They only knew that they were going to blame a video.”

 

General Thomas McInerney (ret.):

“We should have prepositioned F-16s from Aviano down to Sigonella to be on 15-minute alert.”

“It was 9/11. Isn’t 9/11 a significant date for us? And yet we had none of this preparation. We had all of the Combatant Commanders back in Washington, DC, on a commanders’ conference.”

“So, there was no pre-planning. I call that dereliction of duty.”

 

Lt. Colonel Dennis Haney (ret.):

“I talked to Sean Smith’s uncle this morning, and he said he’s read our report. He got halfway through [Trey] Gowdy’s report, he got all the way through our report. He says read this [CCB] report if you want to know the truth.”

“Qaddafi was out there killing bad guys. He was killing al Qaeda, and al Qaeda we supported—they went to Syria, they became ISIS. We developed ISIS. That’s a fact.”

 

Admiral James “Ace” Lyons (ret.):

“And when I watched the [Select Committee on Benghazi’s] press conference yesterday, to say I was disappointed would be an understatement, because Chairman Gowdy is not a stenographer and he’s not a tape recorder. He was there to make findings and conclusions. He had the information; he copped out.”

“There’s no reason why F-16 aircraft weren’t moved from Aviano to Sigonella, or to Souda Bay, Crete—either place. We had a 130-man Marine force recon team at Sigonella. We had the Marine FAST teams at Rota. We had the Commanders’ in Extremis Force in Croatia. We had assets.”

“We know Jeremy Bash, the chief of staff at the Department of Defense, at 1910 that evening sent an email, or called the State Department, and said ‘we’re spinning up as we [speak].’ Where do we get the cross border authority?”

 

John Clarke:

“Now we just heard, I just found out, because I haven’t read Mr. Gowdy’s report, that the order [to deploy] was given at 7:00 pm. Well, the attack began at 3:42 pm. local time. That’s three hours later.”

 

Rear Admiral Chuck Kubic (ret.):

“And I found out eventually that it was Secretary Clinton working directly with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who had shut down not that truce talk [with Qaddafi] but had struck down a parallel one I didn’t even know was happening through a different business channel.”

“So it struck me that the same behavior that shut down the 72-hour truce at the onset of the war, leading to death, destruction a failed state, was the same kind of behavior that existed in that 7:30 [Deputies] meeting.”

 

Charles Woods:

“Many, many times Ty as a Navy SEAL in his 20 years of service was in worse situations than this. But he always knew that if there was a compromise of the mission, that he was going to be extracted. That did not happen in this case. That’s part of the DNA of being in the military. That’s part of the code of ethics, is you are always rescued.”

“We have a lot of experts in the military that say they could have been rescued. No attempt was made.”

You can read the CCB’s new report here. It is well documented, it puts Benghazi in context, it explains why we were in Libya, what we did and didn’t do, and it names the people most responsible for the failures of Benghazi.




Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.

Comments

  • I am truly gratified with your report on the CCB’s work on Benghazi. In particular, I was pleased that you pointed out how fraudulent the mainstream media is when it comes to reporting [Or not reporting] the facts. Second, and equally important, you raised a crucial point about the total ineptitude of the Congressional men & women in attempting to ferret out the facts when examining a hostile administration official. We have seen this time and time again, with IRS / immigration hearings, and many other so called “investigations.” The questioning of Comey and now Lynch were truly pathetic and conducted by total novices, which accurately describes the great majority of those in Congress.

    I remember well when Obama offered up a stooge in the IRS hearings to explain what she had precisely done in the DOJ investigation of the IRS targeting of conservatives. The attorney hit a home run in that she swept through the hearing without Issel and the rest of the pack failing to require her to articulate the specific steps taken to get at the bottom of the IRS scandal. This is but 1 of many examples how Congress lets Obama stooges slip through the cracks.

    The pathetic quality of Congress cannot be overstated.

  • Hans Brost

    I’m glad you split the Press Conference up into highlights/chunks. I had the same thought, and am working on a site to do something similar. This all needs a HELL of a lot more exposure…….z

  • terry1956

    The stuff from Kubic is another vital reason that Congress, state legislators and more importantly elected county sheriffs, elected constables and juries must do their duty and take back their authority.
    What authority?
    Well of Congress the body with the only power to declare war, the power over foreign trade and foreign relations.
    Who has been using the above power of congress illegally?
    Every US president since and including FDR, and other parts of the US federal executive branch ,the UN,NATO,the Arab League, the WTO, the OCED, theIMF, the World Bank, the Bank of International Settlement.
    What legal authority should state legislators exercise that none is doing now? .
    Reinstate and train the state militia which is not and can not be the National Guard( NG units should become part of the US Military Reserves under the command of the president, while the state militia should be under command of the state governor unless called up by congress)
    Choose the presidential electors directly.
    Give voters more control directly over state legislators and indirectly the US House and eventually the US Senate via the redistricting authority of the state legislator and a recall of state legislator by voters.
    State legislators should redistrict to achieve as much as possible representatives to the US House which will approve of the following.
    1. A constitutional amendment repealing the 16th and 17th amendments.
    2.Increase the ratio of representation in the US House to the constitutional maximum of one district/ one representive f or every 30,000 people.
    3.Work with the US Senate to overturn federal judicial rulings that requires all chambers of state legislators, county and local government be based on equal or near equal population size representation thus for example the state senate could with the overturn have county representation.
    4. Pass a bill giving a federal court district for every 100 households in the US and requiring a jury trial( must be 12 US citizens who resides in the Hundred) in all non impeachment criminal and civil federal cases in the Hundred court, allow the defense to inform the jury of their veto authority and require the federal judge to also inform the jury of that authority if the jury feels the veto against the law would be a just act for the defense against the federal government’s charges or plaintiff’s claims.
    Outlaw re trying the defense for the same action in any court criminal or civil, federal, state, county, local, administrative, foreign or multinational if all 12 of the jury members favors the defense.
    Outlaw administrative courts, foreign and multinational courts, foreign and multinational arbitrators.
    Elected County Sheriffs and Constables must use their interposition authority to not allow the federal or state government, foreign or multinational to take the defense out of the county by force if a fully informed trial by 12 jury members of the county has not giving said government or ” authority” unanimous permission to deprive the defense of his or her life, liberty or property.