Accuracy in Media

Now that another presidential primary is over, can the media take a few minutes to insist that the candidates address some important issues like the crisis in Aleppo, Syria? Tens of thousands of Syrians are dying or fleeing the Russians and the Iranians, who have invaded the country. President Obama is doing nothing to save them.

The American people should be reminded that Obama lost Libya in a fiasco that cost the lives of four Americans. In that case, he intervened militarily and assisted in overthrowing the regime of Muammar Qaddafi, then pulled back when American facilities were attacked. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper says the country is now a haven for terrorists. President Obama is now losing Syria. Rebels opposed to the Bashar al-Assad regime don’t have the weapons to fight Russian planes and tanks.

Veteran diplomat Dennis Ross is the latest observer to note that the policies of Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin seem to be the same. “Rather than being opposed to the Russian efforts, we look to be in league with them,” he writes in the Los Angeles Times.

What are those Russian efforts? Vladimir Putin is destroying the anti-Assad opposition forces and leaving the Islamic State largely untouched. In the end, Ross says, Putin intends “on changing the balance of power fundamentally on the ground and sending a message to Arab leaders. Namely: You may not like our support for Assad, but unlike the Americans we stand by our friends. If you want to deal with problems in Syria or in the region, you deal with us.” That means that Sunni countries alarmed by Russian and Iranian aggression in Syria will realize they cannot depend on the United States for support and will cut deals for survival with Putin.

It appears that Russian intentions go far beyond saving the Assad regime and undermining U.S. influence in the region. It is fascinating to note that the far-left in the United States is gearing up for a major campaign to cut off U.S. assistance to Saudi Arabia. This initiative is led by United for Peace and Justice and Progressive Democrats of America. Nothing would please Putin more than for Saudi Arabia to collapse and for the Russian/Iranian alliance to take over the Arabian Peninsula.

These groups held a “conference call on the US-Saudi Alliance” on Tuesday night, where anti-Israel activist Medea Benjamin of Code Pink described a series of events designed to isolate and weaken Saudi Arabia. Her involvement in this campaign is significant. She went to Iran in 2014 to participate in a “New Horizon” conference, also dubbed “The 2nd Annual International Conference of Independent Thinkers & Film Makers.” One of the themes was that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were an inside job carried out by the U.S. and Israel. A Holocaust denier also spoke. The first such conference was held in September 2012 and featured Iran’s then-president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who had said that Israel should be “wiped off the map.”

As part of this new campaign, Code Pink has been protesting Saudi intervention in Yemen against Iranian proxies. A March 5-6 conference is scheduled in Washington, D.C. to unite the left against Saudi Arabia and other Sunni Arab Muslim countries in the region. The conference is described as being held for people who would like to learn about the roots and spread of Islamic extremism, seek solutions to violence in the Middle East, support a U.S. foreign policy based on respect for human rights, and advocate against global weapons proliferation.

This sounds appealing until you grasp the fact that the organizers are doing the bidding of the Iranian regime.

The campaign co-sponsor, Progressive Democrats of America (PDA), says it was founded in 2004 “to transform the Democratic Party and our country.” The advisory board for the group includes Thom Hartmann, described just as a “media host,” who is in fact a paid employee of Putin’s Russia Today propaganda channel. Another board member is Tom Hayden, the “author and activist” who worked for a military victory for the communists in the Vietnam War. PDA has an action fund that promotes Bernie Sanders for president.

Clearly, this anti-Saudi campaign is designed to accelerate Russian and Iranian hegemony in the region. The list of individuals and groups participating in the event is a reminder that the old pro-communist left never died and, in fact, has been resurrected to undermine U.S. policy in another region of the world.

In this case, however, as Dennis Ross and others are pointing out, Obama is abandoning traditional American allies, leaving the region open to more Russian-inspired conflict and expansion. It is safe to assume that Obama is secretly hoping that Medea Benjamin and her comrades succeed. They even have a senator on Capitol Hill leading the charge. Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) has called for a U.S. arms cutoff to Saudi Arabia. This is great news for Iran, whose propaganda organ Press TV has highlighted the stand against Saudi Arabia taken by this “influential US senator.” Murphy gave a speech to the influential Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) outlining his anti-Saudi views. He says the Saudis support extremism.

He’s right, of course. No regime in the Middle East is completely clean. But it’s Iran and Syria that are on the State Department list of state sponsors of terrorism. Saudi military intervention in Yemen is in response to Iran’s arming of Yemen’s Houthi rebels. It’s Russia and Iran that are now close to taking complete control of Syria and eliminating the anti-Assad rebel groups.

The situation in the Middle East could get much worse. Andrey Illarionov, a former adviser to Putin on economic issues and now a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, says Putin may not even wait for the Sunni countries to come begging to Russia. He thinks Russia may be preparing for a military strike against Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Such a move would not only create more instability in the Middle East, but send oil prices soaring, benefiting Russia. Russia would have more money to finance aggression in the Middle East and Europe, and the already weak U.S. economy and markets in the U.S. would probably crash, giving us a replay of the panic of 2008.

The “stand down” order at Benghazi resulted in four Americans dying, a U.S. withdrawal, and a failed state that is attracting various terrorist groups. It appears that another “stand down’ order has been sent by the Obama administration in regard to the Russian/Iranian advance in Syria. In fact, U.S. policy is looking increasingly like a welcome mat for foreign aggression.

So what will Donald Trump do if Putin bombs the Saudi oil fields? What does Bernie Sanders propose to do about Iranian terrorism and Russian aggression?

Isn’t this topic worth at least one question in the next debate?

Ready to fight back against media bias?
Join us by donating to AIM today.


  • RMThoughts

    Precisely why Russian action against Saudi Arabia’s proxy militias of fanatics in Syria is against western interests is something which nobody in the western elite seems to believe it is necessary to explain. That Russia is bad and evil and must be opposed is another one of those axiomatic beliefs of the Neocon governing elite — and they can’t bring themselves to believe the public do not wholeheartedly share.

    Equally they cannot quite understand why we the people do not see the necessity of backing the Wahhabi Saudi Monarchy and overthrow and elected secular president in Syria . If the Russians turn back CIA and Saudi-backed rebels we should all be delighted. Russian are present in Syria by treaty and invitation and has nothing whatsoever to do with the US or NATO.

    Recent peace talks in Geneva were convened with one goal in mind, to prevent Assad and loyalist forces from retaking Aleppo. Someone finally told Kerry that Russia is not in a “quagmire” in Syria but is winning. The U.S. is in a hurry now as it knows that it will have zero influence left on the issue should the Syrian government and Russia have the time to kill off the US backed “rebel” opposition. It needs a ceasefire to save our Terrorist combatants to stay relevant.

  • Ted

    At some point, the U.S. is going to have to make nice with Russia … and why the Neocons and rightwingnuts despise Russia … but gladly jumped into bed with China economically … is beyond inexplicable.

  • Gz7

    Cliff – Have you contacted the media and asked this question?

  • Chandra Shekhar

    Since when Asad and Putin are winning, media has started lobbying against them. What a shame that media has gone down to such a low.

  • LaTisha Jackson

    RMThoughts is a pro provocateur, paid by the russians to muddy the waters to such an extend that an average reader stops grasping the truth…that’s a trait of a PRO…he was TRAINED to subotage, manipulate and mislead (like most russians, who are Pro Liers)… If you check his posts, they are always intentionally misleading, i.e. lead AWAY from the truth, and always pro russian.

  • LaTisha Jackson

    By the way, does anyone know who killed Scalia?

  • Dr. Robert Schwartz

    Five long and disastrous, bloody, inhuman and costly years ago the UN should have stepped into the fray with their blue helmets to stay the course, to protect the innocent civilians and to save the homes, schools, parks, streets, zouks, temples, churches and precious archaeology of a premier nation and its 30 million wonderful people. Although subject to a despotic dynasty, those people lived in peace. Their future could have envisioned a day when the dynasty would have died, scorched by its own irascible and inhuman nature. Instead, as street riots unfolded, “rebel” groups, composed of violent men, bent on overthrowing the dynasty at any cost, most of them outsiders bearing the mindset of their own ideologies, to date 40 or 41 of them, according to the liberal media. The cost to impose order through the UN would have save countless lives, a million homes, and the destruction of family life in the cities and towns of Syria. It would have saved enormous quantities of money. The gains today are nonexistent. And who can explain how 40 intransigent rebel armies are going to establish a new governmental form upon that land, so filled with the holy places, highlighted by the conversion of an early Roman soldier who became Christianity’s leading writer and missionary? Saul the soldier became Paul the preacher, who then traversed the streets and roads of Damascus and everywhere his efforts for peace could reach? That one man, inspired by the grace of God, reversed his position totally. Could some voice, somewhere, rise today from among the smoldering ruins of houses, schools and myriad buildings once held together by a culture of civility and a dictator of an atrophying form of government? Peace on their streets and freedom in their consciences were once genuine attributes that the people held as their own. Today there is no institution able to return those attributes to the Syrians except by the UN, yet its posture lies dormant, impotent by its own inaction. Where is the moral leadership, the military posture, the respect for humanity embedded in the very Declaration of the United Nations, in the headquarters hosting a thousand desks that set silently and comfortably in the face of this global tragedy that 70 years ago was to be interdicted forever?

    One might ask, retrospectively, what ever happened to leadership, to men who, inspired by Paul, or by Churchill, or by Reagan, are willing to break out of their Procrustean bed and elicit the trampled goodwill that may still be lurking somewhere in the East, or the West, or maybe in the South, or the North? Until then, the blight of Syria rests on the consciences of a lot of so-called leaders. Take them from their desks and send them across the Atlantic to the rubble of bombed-out schools and hospitals, hotels and houses, and let them smell the festering wounds inflicted by human hatreds that have no better aim than to stake out a wall of rubble and call it the spoils of war in the name of peace.

  • RMThoughts

    There are Turkish and Saudi soldiers, tanks, warplanes and military helicopters massing in northern Saudi Arabia for a military exercise that is being called “Northern Thunder”. It is likely an invasion of Syria will happen soon.

    Hopefully we will not get invovled. We have neither the cash nor the inclination to enter a war with Russia. We also have a limp-wristed weakling as our President.

    As for NATO, the Europeans are so mentally weak from political correctness, and so financially wrecked by their socialistic systems, they can’t even protect their own borders! NATO can’t say no to wild hordes of barbaric invaders, what will they do when someone actually starts shooting at them on a battlefield?

    Chances are, within a few days, we’ll see an explosion of military action in and around Syria. We will see a brutal defeat of Turkey and Saudi Arabia, then cooler heads will suddenly prevail.

  • RMThoughts

    He only gets off of work at the restaurant after the news desks have closed.